Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Independent predictors for local recurrence following surgery for spinal metastasis

  • Clinical Article - Spine
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Local recurrence of spinal metastasis after surgical resection is relatively common. We sought to determine risk factors and independent predictors for local recurrence after primary surgical resection of spinal metastasis.

Methods

Demographic and clinical variables were collected for patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastasis June 2005 to June 2011. Primary outcome of interest was local recurrence. Significant associations between covariates of interest and recurrence were identified using the chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression models for recurrence risk were fit and adjusted for potential confounders.

Results

A total of 99 patients were analyzed. Mean time to metastatic recurrence was 9.8 months. Thirty-two patients (32.3 %) had local recurrence of metastatic disease following initial surgery. Patients who underwent radiotherapy had significantly higher recurrence rates than patients who did not (39.2 % vs. 12.0 %, respectively; P = 0.012). Patients with metastatic disease affecting more levels had significantly lower recurrence rates. On multivariate analysis, older age was an independent predictor of decreased likelihood of local recurrence. Melanoma was the only cancer type independently associated with higher risk for recurrence. Patients with recurrence had significantly higher 1- and 2-year survival rates than patients without recurrence. Median length of survival was longer in the recurrent group as well.

Conclusions

Other than melanoma, covariates significantly associated with recurrence were factors likely associated with increased survival, including less-extensive spinal disease and radiotherapy. Thus, longer survival time following surgery likely results in a greater chance for local recurrence. As advancements in treatment provide prolonged survival, local recurrence rates will likely increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aizenberg MR, Fox BD, Suki D, McCutcheon IE, Rao G, Rhines LD (2012) Surgical management of unknown primary tumors metastatic to the spine. J Neurosurg Spine 16:86–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chataigner H, Onimus M (2000) Surgery in spinal metastasis without spinal cord compression: indications and strategy related to the risk of recurrence. Eur Spine J 9:523–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Galasko CS (1986) Skeletal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 210:18–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Inoue K, Slaton JW, Karashima T, Yoshikawa C, Shuin T, Sweeney P, Millikan R, Dinney CP (2000) The prognostic value of angiogenesis factor expression for predicting recurrence and metastasis of bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy. Clin Cancer Res 6:4866–4873

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jansson KA, Bauer HC (2006) Survival, complications and outcome in 282 patients operated for neurological deficit due to thoracic or lumbar spinal metastases. Eur Spine J 15:196–202

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kademani D, Lewis JT, Lamb DH, Rallis DJ, Harrington JR (2009) Angiogenesis and CD34 expression as a predictor of recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1800–1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lassau N, Lamuraglia M, Koscielny S, Spatz A, Roche A, Leclere J, Avril MF (2006) Prognostic value of angiogenesis evaluated with high-frequency and colour Doppler sonography for preoperative assessment of primary cutaneous melanomas: correlation with recurrence after a 5 year follow-up period. Cancer Imaging 6:24–29

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lau D, Leach MR, La Marca F, Park P (2012) Independent predictors of survival and the impact of repeat surgery in patients undergoing surgical treatment of spinal metastasis. J Neurosurg Spine 17:565–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laufer I, Hanover A, Lis E, Yamada Y, Bilsky M (2010) Repeat decompression surgery for recurrent spinal metastases. J Neurosurg Spine 13:109–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Missenard G, Lapresle P, Cote D (1996) Local control after surgical treatment of spinal metastatic disease. Eur Spine J 5:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Posner JB (1995) Spinal metastases. In: Posner JB (ed) Neurologic Complications of Cancer. F. A. Davis Co, Philadelphia, pp 111–142

    Google Scholar 

  12. van der Sande JJ, Boogerd W, Kroger R, Kappelle AC (1999) Recurrent spinal epidural metastases: a prospective study with a complete follow up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 66:623–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weigel B, Maghsudi M, Neumann C, Kretschmer R, Muller FJ, Nerlich M (1999) Surgical management of symptomatic spinal metastases. Postoperative outcome and quality of life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2240–2246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Holly Wagner for providing editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Disclosure

The Drs. Darryl Lau, Khoi Than, and Paul Park certify that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose in relation to this article. Dr. Frank La Marca has received an honorarium from DuPuy and serves as a consultant to Globus and Biomet. Dr. Park is a consultant to Globus and Medtronic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lau, D., Than, K.D., La Marca, F. et al. Independent predictors for local recurrence following surgery for spinal metastasis. Acta Neurochir 156, 277–282 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1973-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1973-9

Keywords

Navigation