Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anterior video-assisted approach to the craniovertebral junction: transnasal or transoral? A cadaver study

  • Experimental Research - Neurosurgical Techniques
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopy represents both an alternative and useful complement to the standard microsurgical approach to the anterior craniovertebral junction (CVJ). Nevertheless, few studies provide an experimental comparison between transnasal and transoral endoscopic control on CVJ. We compared the surgical exposition angle and the working channel volume of both the transnasal and transoral approaches in the cadaver.

Methods

Eleven fresh non-perfused cadavers were studied. Transnasal and transoral linear and angled exposure of the CVJ were evaluated by means of X-ray and CT scan both in sagittal and lateral planes.

Results

The transoral endoscopic surgical exposition was wider compared with the transnasal in anterior and lateral projections:(1)in the sagittal plane, both in vertical exposition (transnasal inferior to transoral from 5.89 % to 76.48 %, average 35.89 %) and in vertical surgical angle (from 22 % to 77.42 %, average 56.53 %); (2)in the coronal plane, both in coronal exposition (transnasal inferior to transoral from 50.77 % to 83.88 %, average 70.34 %) and in coronal surgical angle (from 65.58 % to 86.71 %, average 76.70 %). The sagittal surgical domain was found to spanning from the inferior third of the clivus to C3 with the transoral and from the middle third of the clivus to the nasopalatal line (NPL) with the transnasal approach. The overlapping surgical domain area was found to be the inferior third of the clivus.

Conclusions

The endoscope assisted transoral approach allows a better surgical control of the CVJ. It provides a better CVJ exposure, in sagittal and transverse planes, providing a larger working channel and an easier manoeuvrability. The transnasal approach is limited in caudal direction down to the NPL, otherwise the transoral approach is limited in the rostral direction with a maximum to the foramen magnum in normal specimen. In every individual case, pros and cons of the appropriate approach have to be taken into account as well as the choice of a combined transnasal and transoral approaches strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfieri A, Jho HD, Tschabitscher M (2002) Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral cranio-cervical junction: anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:219–225, discussion 225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F, de Divitiis E, Gardner P, Tschabitscher M (2005) Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 19:E2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Crockard HA (1991) Ventral approaches to the upper cervical spine. Orthopade 20:140–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA, Kassam AB (2009) Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope 119:239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fang HSY, Ong GB (1962) Direct anterior approach to the upper cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44A:1588–1604, 1962, J Bone Joint Surg Am 44A:1588–1604

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frempong-Boadu AK, Faunce WA, Fessler RG (2002) Endoscopically assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery 51:S60–S66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jho HD, Ha HG (2004) Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: part 3—The clivus and posterior fossa. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 47:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R (2005) The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery 57:E213, discussion E213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Messina A, Bruno MC, Decq P, Coste A, Cavallo LM, de Divittis E, Cappabianca P, Tschabitscher M (2007) Pure endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy: anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev 30:189–194, discussion 194

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oya S, Tsutsumi K, Shigeno T, Takahashi H (2004) Posterolateral odontoidectomy for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: a technical case report. Spine J 4:591–594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pillai P, Baig MN, Karas CS, Ammirati M (2009) Endoscopic image-guided transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: an anatomic study comparing surgical exposure and surgical freedom obtained with the endoscope and the operating microscope. Neurosurgery 64:437–442, discussion 442–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seker A, Inoue K, Osawa S, Akakin A, Kilic T, Rhoton AL Jr (2010) Comparison of endoscopic transnasal and transoral approaches to the craniovertebral junction. World Neurosurg 74:583–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shapiro S, Wilk MB, Chen HJA (1968) Comparative study of various tests for normality. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1343–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Symonds CPMS (1937) Compression of the spinal cord in the neighborhood of the foramen magnum with a note on the surgical approach by Julian Taylor. Brain 60:52–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Visocchi M (2011) Advances in videoassisted anterior surgical approach to the craniovertebral junction. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 37:97–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Visocchi M, Della Pepa GM, Doglietto F, Esposito G, La Rocca G, Massimi L (2011) Video-assisted microsurgical transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: personal experience in childhood. Childs Nerv Syst 27:825–831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Visocchi M, Doglietto F, Della Pepa GM, Esposito G, La Rocca G, Di Rocco C, Maira G, Fernandez E (2011) Endoscope-assisted microsurgical transoral approach to the anterior craniovertebral junction compressive pathologies. Eur Spine J 20:1518–1525

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Visocchi M, Pietrini D, Tufo T, Fernandez E, Di Rocco C (2009) Pre-operative irreducible C1-C2 dislocations: intra-operative reduction and posterior fixation. The “always posterior strategy”. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:551–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vougioukas VI, Hubbe U, Schipper J, Spetzger U (2003) Navigated transoral approach to the cranial base and the craniocervical junction: technical note. Neurosurgery 52:247–250, discussion 251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Disclosure

The authors declare no interest to disclose, they have any personal or institutional financial interest in drugs, materials or devices described in this submission and that they did not receive any specific funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Visocchi, M., La Rocca, G., Della Pepa, G.M. et al. Anterior video-assisted approach to the craniovertebral junction: transnasal or transoral? A cadaver study. Acta Neurochir 156, 285–292 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1910-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1910-y

Keywords

Navigation