Abstract
Background
Endoscopy represents both an alternative and useful complement to the standard microsurgical approach to the anterior craniovertebral junction (CVJ). Nevertheless, few studies provide an experimental comparison between transnasal and transoral endoscopic control on CVJ. We compared the surgical exposition angle and the working channel volume of both the transnasal and transoral approaches in the cadaver.
Methods
Eleven fresh non-perfused cadavers were studied. Transnasal and transoral linear and angled exposure of the CVJ were evaluated by means of X-ray and CT scan both in sagittal and lateral planes.
Results
The transoral endoscopic surgical exposition was wider compared with the transnasal in anterior and lateral projections:(1)in the sagittal plane, both in vertical exposition (transnasal inferior to transoral from 5.89 % to 76.48 %, average 35.89 %) and in vertical surgical angle (from 22 % to 77.42 %, average 56.53 %); (2)in the coronal plane, both in coronal exposition (transnasal inferior to transoral from 50.77 % to 83.88 %, average 70.34 %) and in coronal surgical angle (from 65.58 % to 86.71 %, average 76.70 %). The sagittal surgical domain was found to spanning from the inferior third of the clivus to C3 with the transoral and from the middle third of the clivus to the nasopalatal line (NPL) with the transnasal approach. The overlapping surgical domain area was found to be the inferior third of the clivus.
Conclusions
The endoscope assisted transoral approach allows a better surgical control of the CVJ. It provides a better CVJ exposure, in sagittal and transverse planes, providing a larger working channel and an easier manoeuvrability. The transnasal approach is limited in caudal direction down to the NPL, otherwise the transoral approach is limited in the rostral direction with a maximum to the foramen magnum in normal specimen. In every individual case, pros and cons of the appropriate approach have to be taken into account as well as the choice of a combined transnasal and transoral approaches strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alfieri A, Jho HD, Tschabitscher M (2002) Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral cranio-cervical junction: anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:219–225, discussion 225
Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P, Esposito F, de Divitiis E, Gardner P, Tschabitscher M (2005) Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 19:E2
Crockard HA (1991) Ventral approaches to the upper cervical spine. Orthopade 20:140–146
de Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA, Kassam AB (2009) Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope 119:239–244
Fang HSY, Ong GB (1962) Direct anterior approach to the upper cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 44A:1588–1604, 1962, J Bone Joint Surg Am 44A:1588–1604
Frempong-Boadu AK, Faunce WA, Fessler RG (2002) Endoscopically assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery 51:S60–S66
Jho HD, Ha HG (2004) Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: part 3—The clivus and posterior fossa. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 47:16–23
Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R (2005) The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery 57:E213, discussion E213
Messina A, Bruno MC, Decq P, Coste A, Cavallo LM, de Divittis E, Cappabianca P, Tschabitscher M (2007) Pure endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy: anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev 30:189–194, discussion 194
Oya S, Tsutsumi K, Shigeno T, Takahashi H (2004) Posterolateral odontoidectomy for irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: a technical case report. Spine J 4:591–594
Pillai P, Baig MN, Karas CS, Ammirati M (2009) Endoscopic image-guided transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: an anatomic study comparing surgical exposure and surgical freedom obtained with the endoscope and the operating microscope. Neurosurgery 64:437–442, discussion 442–434
Seker A, Inoue K, Osawa S, Akakin A, Kilic T, Rhoton AL Jr (2010) Comparison of endoscopic transnasal and transoral approaches to the craniovertebral junction. World Neurosurg 74:583–602
Shapiro S, Wilk MB, Chen HJA (1968) Comparative study of various tests for normality. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1343–1372
Symonds CPMS (1937) Compression of the spinal cord in the neighborhood of the foramen magnum with a note on the surgical approach by Julian Taylor. Brain 60:52–84
Visocchi M (2011) Advances in videoassisted anterior surgical approach to the craniovertebral junction. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 37:97–110
Visocchi M, Della Pepa GM, Doglietto F, Esposito G, La Rocca G, Massimi L (2011) Video-assisted microsurgical transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: personal experience in childhood. Childs Nerv Syst 27:825–831
Visocchi M, Doglietto F, Della Pepa GM, Esposito G, La Rocca G, Di Rocco C, Maira G, Fernandez E (2011) Endoscope-assisted microsurgical transoral approach to the anterior craniovertebral junction compressive pathologies. Eur Spine J 20:1518–1525
Visocchi M, Pietrini D, Tufo T, Fernandez E, Di Rocco C (2009) Pre-operative irreducible C1-C2 dislocations: intra-operative reduction and posterior fixation. The “always posterior strategy”. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:551–559
Vougioukas VI, Hubbe U, Schipper J, Spetzger U (2003) Navigated transoral approach to the cranial base and the craniocervical junction: technical note. Neurosurgery 52:247–250, discussion 251
Conflicts of interest
None.
Disclosure
The authors declare no interest to disclose, they have any personal or institutional financial interest in drugs, materials or devices described in this submission and that they did not receive any specific funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Visocchi, M., La Rocca, G., Della Pepa, G.M. et al. Anterior video-assisted approach to the craniovertebral junction: transnasal or transoral? A cadaver study. Acta Neurochir 156, 285–292 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1910-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1910-y