Skip to main content
Log in

Technique for methyl methacrylate cranioplasty to optimize cosmetic outcome

  • How I Do it - Neurosurgical Techniques
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cranioplasty aims to reconstruct skull defects from fractures, decompressive craniectomies, tumors, and congenital anomalies in a cosmetically acceptable manner. We present a technique in methyl methacrylate cranioplasty that gives excellent cosmetic results by maintaining patient’s calvarial curvature.

Method

Cranioplasty material is placed into a plastic bag and packed inside the defect. Wire mesh cut larger than the defect is held in position to take the exact skull curvature. Once solid, the implant is fixed in position using titanium plates and mini-screws.

Conclusion

This is a simple, inexpensive method of achieving the most cosmetically desired cranioplasty results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Tamimi YZ, Sinha P, Trivedi M, Robson C, Al-Musawi TA, Hossain N, Mumford C, Towns G (2012) Comparison of acrylic and titanium cranioplasty. Br J Neurosurg 26:510–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aydin S, Kucukyuruk B, Abuzayed B, Sanus GZ (2011) Cranioplasty: review of materials and techniques. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2:162–167

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blake DP (1994) The use of synthetics in cranioplasty: a clinical review. Mil Med 159:466–469

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiarini L, Figurelli S, Pollastri G, Torcia E, Ferrari F, Albanese M, Nocini PF (2004) Cranioplasty using acrylic material: a new technical procedure. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 32:5–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Drosos GI, Babourda E, Magnissalis EA, Giatromanolaki A, Kazakos K, Verettas DA (2012) Mechanical characterization of bone graft substitute ceramic cements. Injury 43:266–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gladstone HB, McDermott MW, Cooke DD (1995) Implants for cranioplasty. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 28:381–400

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Malis LI (1989) Titanium mesh and acrylic cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 25:351–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Manson PN, Crawley WA, Hoopes JE (1986) Frontal cranioplasty: risk factors and choice of cranial vault reconstructive material. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:888–904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marchac D, Greensmith A (2008) Long-term experience with methylmethacrylate cranioplasty in craniofacial surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:744–752, discussion 753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sanan A, Haines SJ (1997) Repairing holes in the head: a history of cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 40:588–603

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kristin Kraus, MSc, and Ramin Eskandari, MD, for editorial assistance with this paper.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William T. Couldwell.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Video that demonstrates the cranioplasty technique that yields superior cosmesis through maintenance of the patient’s calvarial curvature. 2 minutes, 50 seconds, 775 MB. (MPG 51614 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sorour, M., Caton, W.L. & Couldwell, W.T. Technique for methyl methacrylate cranioplasty to optimize cosmetic outcome. Acta Neurochir 156, 207–209 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1800-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1800-3

Keywords

Navigation