Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of a new instrument for dural defect repair in anterior skull base reconstruction: a technical note

  • Technical Note - Neurosurgical Techniques
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The anterior skull base is a deep and narrow area, which makes dural repair technically challenging. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of a new instrument for anterior skull base dural repair.

Methods

Ten patients underwent surgery via the transbasal approach, combined with either a transfacial or a transnasal endoscopic resection. The dural repair was performed prior to tumor resection, and the new instrument was used to suture the fascia lata in an underlay fashion. The repaired dural defect was then covered with a pericranial flap.

Results

The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 18 months, with an average follow-up time of 8.7 months. During this period, none of the patients experienced cerebrospinal fluid leakage, meningitis, tension pneumocephalus, abscess formation, or flap necrosis.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the use of this instrument combined with the technique of suturing the fascia lata in an underlay fashion and covering it with a pericranial flap, may be an effective alternative approach to anterior skull base reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Ammar A (1992) Repair of skull base dural defect: the dura sandwich-technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 119:174–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brisman MH, Sen C, Catalano P (1997) Results of surgery for head and neck tumors that involve the carotid artery at the skull base. J Neurosurg 86:787–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cain JE, Lauerman WC, Rosenthal HG, Broom MJ, Jacobs RR (1991) The histomorphologic sequence of dural repair. Observations in the canine model. Spine 13:720–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eismont FJ, Wiesel SW, Rothman RH (1981) Treatment of dural tears associated with spinal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 63A:1132–1136

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fliss DM, Gil Z, Spektor S, Leider TL, Abergel A, Khafif A, Amir A, Gur E, Cohen JT (2002) Skull base reconstruction after anterior subcranial tumor resection. Neurosurg Focus 12(5):e10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foyt D, Johnson JP, Kirsch AJ, Bruce JN, Wazen JJ (1996) Dural closure with laser tissue welding. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115:513–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gok A, Erkutlu I, Alptekin M, Kanlikama M (2004) Three-layer reconstruction with fascia lata and vascularized pericranium for anterior skull base defects. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146:53–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Janecka IP, Sen C, Sekhar L, Curtin H (1994) Treatment of paranasal sinus cancer with cranial base surgery: results. Laryngoscope 104:553–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jimbo H, Kamata S, Miura K, Asamoto S, Tada S, Endo T, Masubuchi T, Nakamura N, Fushimi C (2010) Operative management of skull base malignant tumors arising from the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus: recent strategies used in 25 cases. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 50:20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McCallum J, Maroon JC, Janneta PF (1975) Treatment of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistulae by subarachnoid drainage. J Neurosurg 42:434–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Menovsky T, Ridder DD (2011) A new flexible and 360-degree fluid holder for microneurosurgery—technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54:274–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Malley BW Jr, Janecka IP (1995) Evolution of outcomes in cranial base surgery. Semin Surg Oncol 11:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sekhar LN, Sarma S, Morita A (2001) Dural reconstruction with fascia, titanium mesh and bone screws: technical note. Neurosurgery 49:749–750

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sinha UK, Johnson TE, Crockett D, Vandapalli S, Gruen P (2002) Three-layer reconstruction for large defects of the anterior skull base. Laryngoscope 100:607–614

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tachibana E, Saito K, Fukuta K, Yoshida J (2002) Evaluation of the healing process after dural reconstruction achieved using a free fascial graft. J Neurosurg 96:280–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vanaclocha V, Saiz N, Panta F (1998) Repair of dural defects in awkward areas-technical note. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140:615–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Jimbo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jimbo, H., Muto, J., Masubuchi, T. et al. Efficacy of a new instrument for dural defect repair in anterior skull base reconstruction: a technical note. Acta Neurochir 155, 733–736 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1630-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-013-1630-3

Keywords

Navigation