Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 155, Issue 4, pp 663–670 | Cite as

Microsurgical endoscopy-assisted presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach as a minimally invasive surgical option for the treatment of medium to large vestibular schwannomas

  • Maurizio Iacoangeli
  • Fabrizio Salvinelli
  • Alessandro Di Rienzo
  • Maurizio Gladi
  • Lorenzo Alvaro
  • Fabio Greco
  • Massimiliano Carassiti
  • Massimo Scerrati
Technical Note - Neurosurgical Techniques

Abstract

Background

Treatment of vestibular schwannomas presents many controversial aspects, from the indication to the selection of the best treatment option. In the era of stereotactic radiotherapy, microsurgery has to be competitive in terms of providing the best chances of functional preservation and complete tumor removal. The two most commonly used surgical approaches are the retrosigmoid suboccipital and the presigmoid translabyrinthine. We describe the endoscopy-assisted presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach (EAPRA) aiming at combining the advantages of the retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine techniques.

Methods

For 2 years (from May 2009 to June 2011), the EAPRA was used to remove medium to large sporadic vestibular schwannomas in ten patients.

Results

Complete tumor removal was obtained in eight patients, postoperative transient facial nerve function impairment or worsening was observed in two, and one had hearing deterioration postoperatively. No threatening complications occurred after surgery, and the length of hospitalization was usually less than 10 days.

Conclusions

The EAPRA can provide direct access to the CPA along with labyrinthine complex conservation, allowing hearing function preservation and minimal cerebellar retraction. Endoscopic assistance is a crucial adjunct in the presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach in order to address the limits imposed by labyrinthine complex preservation. It ensures complete visualization of the intracanalicular portion of the schwannoma, thus improving the rate of a radical tumor resection. The EAPRA could represent a valid surgical option in vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Keywords

Endoscopy Minimally invasive neurosurgery Presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach Vestibular nerve schwannomna Hearing preservation Key-hole surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Arístegui M, Denia A (2005) Simultaneous cochlear implantation and translabyrinthine removal of vestibular schwannoma in an only hearing ear: report of two cases (neurofibromatosis type 2 and unilateral vestibular schwannoma). Otol Neurotol 26:205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behari S, Tyagi I, Banerji D, Kumar V, Jaiswal AK, Phadke RV, Jain VK (2010) Postauricular, transpetrous, presigmoid approach for extensive skull base tumors in the petroclival region: the successes and the travails. Acta Neurochir 152:1633–1645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belal A (2001) Is cochlear implantation possible after acoustic tumor removal? Otol Neurotol 22:497–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bento RF, De Brito RV, Sanchez TG, Miniti A (2002) The transmastoid retrolabyrinthine approach in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:437–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chanda A, Nanda A (2002) Partial labyrinthectomy petrous apicectomy approach to the petroclival region: an anatomic and technical study. Neurosurgery 51:147–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen L, Chen LH, Ling F, Liu YS, Samii M, Samii A (2010) Removal of vestibular schwannoma and facial nerve preservation using small suboccipital retrosigmoid craniotomy. Chin Med J (Engl) 123:274–280Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fagan PA, Sheehy JP, Chang P, Doust BD, Coakley D, Atlas MD (1998) The cerebellopontine angle: does the translabyrinthine approach give adequate access? Laryngoscope 108:679–682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerganov VM, Giordano M, Herold C, Samii A, Samii M (2010) An electrophysiological study on the safety of the endoscope-assisted microsurgical removal of vestibular schwannomas. Eur J Surg Oncol 36:422–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goksu N, Bayazit YA, Bayramoglu I, Isik B, Yilmaz M, Kurtipek O, Uygur K (2006) Surgical exposure in retrosigmoid approach: do we need cerebellar retractors? Surg Neurol 65:631–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Göksu N, Yilmaz M, Bayramoglu I, Aydil U, Bayazit YA (2005) Evaluation of the results of endoscope-assisted acoustic neuroma surgery through posterior fossa approach. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 67:87–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hitselberger WE, House WF (1966) A combined approach to the cerebellopontine angle. A suboccipital-petrosal approach. Arch Otolaryngol 84:267–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hitselberger WE, Pulec JL (1972) Trigeminal nerve (posterior root) retrolabyrinthine selective section-operative procedure for intractable pain. Arch Otolaryngol 96:412–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hori T, Okada Y, Maruyama T, Chernov M, Attia W (2006) Endoscope-controlled removal of intrameatal vestibular schwannomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49:25–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    House JW, Hitselberger WE, McElveen J, Brackmann DE (1984) Retrolabyrinthine section of the vestibular nerve. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92:212–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    King WA, Wackym PA (1999) Endoscope-assisted surgery for acoustic neuromas (vestibular schwannomas): early experience using the rigid Hopkins telescope. Neurosurgery 44:1095–1102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lüdemann WO, Stieglitz LH, Gerganov V, Samii A, Samii M (2008) Fat implant is superior to muscle implant in vestibular schwannoma surgery for the prevention of cerebrospinal fluid fistulae. Neurosurgery 63(1 suppl 1):ons38–ons43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miyazaki H, Deveze A, Magnan J (2005) Neuro-otologic surgery through minimally invasive retrosigmoid approach: endoscope assisted microvascular decompression, vestibular neurotomy, and tumor removal. Laryngoscope 115:1612–1617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Piccirillo E, Wiet MR, Flanagan S, Dispenza F, Giannuzzi A, Mancini F, Sanna M (2009) Cystic vestibular schwannoma: classification, management, and facial nerve outcomes. Otol Neurotol 30:826–834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pillai P, Sammet S, Ammirati M (2009) Image-guided, endoscopic assisted drilling and exposure of the whole length of the internal auditory canal and its fundus with preservation of the integrity of the labyrinth using a retrosigmoid approach: a laboratory investigation. Neurosurgery 65(6 Suppl):53–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rhoton AL Jr (2000) The temporal bone and transtemporal approaches. Neurosurgery 47(3 Suppl):211–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sanna M, Khrais T, Falcioni M, Russo A, Taibah A (2006) Translabyrinthine approaches. In: Sanna M et al (eds) The temporal bone: a manual for dissection and surgical approaches. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 55–66Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Silverstein H, Norrell H (1980) Retrolabyrinthine surgery: a direct approach to the cerebellopontine angle. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 88:462–469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tatagiba M, Matthies C, Samii M (1996) Microendoscopy of the internal auditory canal in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Neurosurgery 38:737–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vrionis FD, Gardner G, Robertson JH, Brodkey JA (2006) Transtemporal approaches to the posterior cranial fossa. In: Schmidek HH, Roberts DW (eds) Schmidek & Sweet operative neurosurgical techniques: indications, methods, and results, 5th edn. Saunders-Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 275–289Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wackym PA, King WA, Meyer GA, Poe DS (2002) Endoscopy in neuro-otologic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 35:297–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wackym PA, King WA, Poe DS, Meyer GA, Ojemann RG, Barker FG, Walsh PR, Staecker H (1999) Adjunctive use of endoscopy during acoustic neuroma surgery. Laryngoscope 109:1193–1201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maurizio Iacoangeli
    • 1
    • 4
  • Fabrizio Salvinelli
    • 2
  • Alessandro Di Rienzo
    • 1
  • Maurizio Gladi
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Alvaro
    • 1
  • Fabio Greco
    • 2
  • Massimiliano Carassiti
    • 3
  • Massimo Scerrati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversità Politecnica delle Marche, Umberto I General HospitalAnconaItaly
  2. 2.Department of ENT surgeryUniversità Campus BiomedicoRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Anestesiology and Critical CareUniversità Campus BiomedicoRomeItaly
  4. 4.Clinica di NeurochirurgiaUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations