Skip to main content
Log in

Diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking using navigated brain stimulation—a feasibility study

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Navigated brain stimulation (NBS) is a newly evolving technique. In addition to its supposed purpose, e.g., preoperative mapping of the central region, little is known about its further use in neurosurgery. We evaluated the usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking (DTI-FT) based on NBS compared to conventional characterization of the seed region.

Methods

We examined 30 patients with tumors in or close to the corticospinal tract (CST) using NBS with the Nexstim eXimia system. NBS was performed for motor cortex mapping, and DTI-FT was performed by three different clinicians using BrainLAB iPlan® Cranial 3.0.1 at two time points. Number of fibers, tract volume, aberrant tracts, and proximity to the tumor were compared between the two methods.

Results

We recognized a higher number of fibers (1,298 ± 1,279 vs. 916 ± 986 fibers; p < 0.01), tract volume (23.0 ± 15.3 vs. 18.3 ± 14.0 cm3; p < 0.01), and aberrant tracts (0.6 ± 0.5 vs. 0.3 ± 0.5 aberrant tracts/tracked CST; p < 0.001) when the seed region was defined conventionally, while proximity of the tracts to the tumor did not differ. While NBS-based DTI-FT is independent of the planning clinician, conventional outlining of the seed region shows generally higher variability between investigators.

Conclusions

Conventional DTI-FT showed significant differences between the two modalities, most likely because of the more specific definition of the seed region when DTI-FT is based on NBS. Moreover, NBS-aided DTI fiber tracking is user-independent and, therefore, a method for further standardization of DTI fiber tracking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bello L, Gambini A, Castellano A, Carrabba G, Acerbi F, Fava E, Giussani C, Cadioli M, Blasi V, Casarotti A, Papagno C, Gupta AK, Gaini S, Scotti G, Falini A (2008) Motor and language DTI Fiber Tracking combined with intraoperative subcortical mapping for surgical removal of gliomas. Neuroimage 39:369–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berman JI, Berger MS, Chung SW, Nagarajan SS, Henry RG (2007) Accuracy of diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging tractography assessed using intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping and magnetic source imaging. J Neurosurg 107:488–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchmann N, Gempt J, Stoffel M, Foerschler A, Meyer B, Ringel F (2011) Utility of diffusion tensor-imaged (DTI) motor fiber tracking for the resection of intracranial tumors near the corticospinal tract. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153:68–74; discussion 74

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cedzich C, Taniguchi M, Schafer S, Schramm J (1996) Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery 38:962–970

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark CA, Barrick TR, Murphy MM, Bell BA (2003) White matter fiber tracking in patients with space-occupying lesions of the brain: a new technique for neurosurgical planning? Neuroimage 20:1601–1608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coenen VA, Krings T, Mayfrank L, Polin RS, Reinges MH, Thron A, Gilsbach JM (2001) Three-dimensional visualization of the pyramidal tract in a neuronavigation system during brain tumor surgery: first experiences and technical note. Neurosurgery 49:86–92; discussion 92–83

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duffau H (2006) New concepts in surgery of WHO grade II gliomas: functional brain mapping, connectionism and plasticity–a review. J Neurooncol 79:77–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Forster MT, Hattingen E, Senft C, Gasser T, Seifert V, Szelenyi A (2011) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging: advanced adjuncts in preoperative planning for central region tumors. Neurosurgery 68:1317–1324; discussion 1324–1315

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hendler T, Pianka P, Sigal M, Kafri M, Ben-Bashat D, Constantini S, Graif M, Fried I, Assaf Y (2003) Delineating gray and white matter involvement in brain lesions: three-dimensional alignment of functional magnetic resonance and diffusion-tensor imaging. J Neurosurg 99:1018–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamada K, Houkin K, Iwasaki Y, Takeuchi F, Kuriki S, Mitsumori K, Sawamura Y (2002) Rapid identification of the primary motor area by using magnetic resonance axonography. J Neurosurg 97:558–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamada K, Sawamura Y, Takeuchi F, Kawaguchi H, Kuriki S, Todo T, Morita A, Masutani Y, Aoki S, Kirino T (2005) Functional identification of the primary motor area by corticospinal tractography. Neurosurgery 56:98–109; discussion 198–109

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kamada K, Sawamura Y, Takeuchi F, Kawaguchi H, Kuriki S, Todo T, Morita A, Masutani Y, Aoki S, Kirino T (2007) Functional identification of the primary motor area by corticospinal tractography. Neurosurgery 61:166–176; discussion 176–167

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kombos T, Suess O, Ciklatekerlio O, Brock M (2001) Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 95:608–614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lehericy S, Duffau H, Cornu P, Capelle L, Pidoux B, Carpentier A, Auliac S, Clemenceau S, Sichez JP, Bitar A, Valery CA, Van Effenterre R, Faillot T, Srour A, Fohanno D, Philippon J, Le Bihan D, Marsault C (2000) Correspondence between functional magnetic resonance imaging somatotopy and individual brain anatomy of the central region: comparison with intraoperative stimulation in patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg 92:589–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Litofsky NS, Bauer AM, Kasper RS, Sullivan CM, Dabbous OH (2006) Image-guided resection of high-grade glioma: patient selection factors and outcome. Neurosurg Focus 20:E16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martino J, Taillandier L, Moritz-Gasser S, Gatignol P, Duffau H (2009) Re-operation is a safe and effective therapeutic strategy in recurrent WHO grade II gliomas within eloquent areas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mori S, van Zijl PC (2002) Fiber tracking: principles and strategies—a technical review. NMR Biomed 15:468–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J (2004) Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 54:1061–1070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Fahlbusch R (2006) Implementation of fiber tract navigation. Neurosurgery 58:ONS-292-303; discussion ONS-303-294

  21. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hastreiter P, Wang R, Benner T, Sorensen AG, Fahlbusch R (2005) Preoperative and intraoperative diffusion tensor imaging-based fiber tracking in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery 56:130–137; discussion 138

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Nadstawek J, Schramm J (1996) Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 39:335–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Picht T, Schmidt S, Brandt S, Frey D, Hannula H, Neuvonen T, Karhu J, Vajkoczy P, Suess O (2011) Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 69:581–588; discussion 588

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robles SG, Gatignol P, Lehericy S, Duffau H (2008) Long-term brain plasticity allowing a multistage surgical approach to World Health Organization grade II gliomas in eloquent areas. J Neurosurg 109:615–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Taniguchi M, Cedzich C, Schramm J (1993) Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery 32:219–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Willems PW, Taphoorn MJ, Burger H, Berkelbach van der Sprenkel JW, Tulleken CA (2006) Effectiveness of neuronavigation in resecting solitary intracerebral contrast-enhancing tumors: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 104:360–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors want to thank Maria Becker for her continous effort in performing all MRI studies with outstanding quality and motivation parallel to her daily routine and far beyond her duty.

Disclosure

The study was completely financed by institutional grants of the Department of Neurosurgery. The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Ringel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krieg, S.M., Buchmann, N.H., Gempt, J. et al. Diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking using navigated brain stimulation—a feasibility study. Acta Neurochir 154, 555–563 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1255-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1255-3

Keywords

Navigation