Skip to main content
Log in

Routine aspiration method during filter-protected carotid stenting: histological evaluation of captured debris and predictors for debris amount

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A routine aspiration method in filter-protected carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been reported recently in which the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA) blood column was aspirated using an aspiration catheter after postdilatation regardless of flow state on digital subtraction angiography. We examined the debris particles captured by this method.

Methods

The routine aspiration method was used in 71 CAS procedures. In two procedures, captured debris particles were examined histologically. In the remaining 69 procedures, the size and number of debris particles were measured under a stereoscopic microscope, and then relationships between the amount of debris particles and clinical variables were evaluated using multivariate regression analysis.

Results

Histologically, the captured debris contained platelet-precipitating, thrombotic, lipid-rich fibrous and calcified material. The number of debris particles ≥1 mm was 19.6 ± 12.1 (mean ± SD) in 60 procedures with normal flow and 25.9 ± 17.2 (mean ± SD) in 9 procedures with slow/stop flow. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that extension of a proximal ICA angulation was an independent predictor of the amount of debris particles with a maximum diameter of either ≥1 mm or <1 mm but ≥0.5 mm (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The captured debris appeared to originate from atheromatous plaques. If the routine aspiration method had not been used in the present series, the debris might have migrated into intracerebral arteries. Restriction of the extension of a proximal ICA angulation might reduce the amount of debris associated with CAS, especially when the proximal ICA angulation is pronounced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angelini A, Reimers B, Della Barbera M, Saccà S, Pasquetto G, Cernetti C, Valente M, Pascotto P, Thiene G (2002) Cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: collection and histopathologic analysis of embolized debris. Stroke 33:456–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Casserly IP, Abou-Chebl A, Fathi RB, Lee DS, Saw J, Exaire JE, Kapadia SR, Bajzer CT, Yadav JS (2005) Slow-flow phenomenon during carotid artery intervention with embolic protection devices: predictors and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:1466–1472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayashi K, Kitagawa N, Morikawa M, Hiu T, Morofuji Y, Suyama K, Nagata I (2009) Observation of the embolus protection filter for carotid artery stenting. Surg Neurol 72:532–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jansen O, Fiehler J, Hartmann M, Brückmann H (2009) Protection or nonprotection in carotid stent angioplasty: the influence of interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE Trial. Stroke 40:841–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katzen BT, Criado FJ, Ramee SR, Massop DW, Hopkins LN, Donohoe D, Cohen SA, Mauri L, Investigators CASES-PMS (2007) Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70:316–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maleux G, Demaerel P, Verbeken E, Daenens K, Heye S, Van Sonhoven F, Nevelsteen A, Wilms G (2006) Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1830–1833

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Malik RK, Landis GS, Sundick S, Cayne N, Marin M, Faries PL (2010) Predicting embolic potential during carotid angioplasty and stenting: analysis of captured particulate debris, ultrasound characteristics, and prior carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 51:317–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schofer J, Arendt M, Tübler T, Sandstede J, Schlüter M (2008) Late cerebral embolization after emboli-protected carotid artery stenting assessed by sequential diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 1:571–577

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sorimachi T, Nishino K, Morita K, Sasaki O, Koike T, Ito Y, Fujii Y (2010) Obstruction of pores in distal protection filters and angiographically-documented flow impairment during carotid artery stenting. J Endovasc Ther 17:661–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sorimachi T, Nishino K, Morita K, Takeuchi S, Ito Y, Fujii Y (2011) Blood flow changes caused by distal filter protection and catheter aspiration in the internal carotid artery during carotid stenting: evaluation using carotid Doppler sonography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38:288–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sorimachi T, Nishino K, Shimbo J, Morita K, Ito Y, Fujii Y (2010) Routine use of debris aspiration before retrieval of distal filter protection devices in carotid arterial stenting: analysis of captured debris and evaluation of clinical results. Neurosurgery 67:1260–1267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsutsumi M, Kodama T, Aikawa H, Onizuka M, Iko M, Nii K, Hamaguchi S, Etou H, Sakamoto K, Inoue R, Nakau H, Kazekawa K (2010) Fragmentation of calcified plaque after carotid artery stenting in heavily calcified circumferential stenosis. Neuroradiology 52:831–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takatoshi Sorimachi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sorimachi, T., Kakita, A., Morita, K. et al. Routine aspiration method during filter-protected carotid stenting: histological evaluation of captured debris and predictors for debris amount. Acta Neurochir 153, 2159–2167 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1093-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-011-1093-3

Keywords

Navigation