Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional outcome analysis: instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has been becoming a popular and effective method for treating degenerative lumbar scoliosis, the clinical outcome is rarely reported. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis after instrumented PLIF.

Materials and methods

A total of 58 patient’s clinical characteristics had been reviewed retrospectively including clinical presentations, preoperative medical comorbidities, intraoperative status, and postoperative status. Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction were evaluated before surgery and last follow-up period. The relationship between the difference of radiographic parameter and functional outcome was evaluated.

Results

Functional outcomes including ODI scores and VAS were significantly improved at the last visit. The ODI was 28.1 ± 8.0 before surgery and 12.2 ± 8.8 at the last visit. VAS was 7.4 ± 2.0 before surgery and 2.4 ± 2.0 at the last visit. Patient satisfaction was 72% at the last visit. ODI was significantly related to postoperative radiographic parameters including Cobb’s angle (p < 0.001), L4 inclination (p = 0.011), coronal balance (p = 0.007), lateral vertebral translation (p < 0.001), Nash–Moe grade (p = 0.033), Nash–Moe degree (p = 0.025), and sagittal balance (p = 0.041) Using multiple regression analysis, ODI was significantly related to female gender, number of levels fixed, coronal balance, lateral vertebral translation, and Nash–Moe degree. The was no significant correlation between postoperative radiographic parameters and pain (VAS). Only lateral vertebral translation demonstrated a significant correlation in multiple regression analysis.

Conclusions

Based on the VAS and ODI instrument, our studies demonstrated that instrumented PLIF for adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis can achieve a high rate of patient satisfaction and improvement in radiographic and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acosta FL, Cloyd JM, Aryan HE, Ames CP (2009) Perioperative complications and clinical outcomes of multilevel circumferential lumbar spinal fusion in the elderly. J Clin Neurosci 16:69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aebi M (2005) The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 14:925–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aebi M, Marchesi MD (1998) The degenerative adult scoliosis classification and indication for treatment. Spine State Art Rev 12:73–84

    Google Scholar 

  4. Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH 3rd, Lenke LG, Lowe TG, Shufflebarger HL, Jeszenszky D, Beele B (1999) Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:225–239

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Birknes JK, White AP, Albert TJ, Shaffrey CI, Harrop JS (2008) Adult degenerative scoliosis: a review. Neurosurgery 63:94–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, Lenke LG, Hilton JF, Shainline M, Baldus C, Wootten D (2009) Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2171–2178

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Lewis SJ (2001) Treatment of spinal stenosis and fixed sagittal imbalance. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:35–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown KM, Ludwig SC, Gelb DE (2004) Radiographic predictors of outcome after long fusion to L5 in adult scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:358–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Johnson JR (2003) Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:2089–2092

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cassinelli EH, Eubanks J, Vogt M, Furey C, Yoo J, Bohlman HH (2007) Risk factors for the development of perioperative complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression and arthrodesis for spinal stenosis: an analysis of 166 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:230–235

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chin DK, Park JY, Yoon YS, Kuh SU, Jin BH, Kim KS, Cho YE (2007) Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients requiring spine surgery: incidence and significance of osteoporosis in spine disease. Osteoporos Int 18:1219–1224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Choi SW, Yoon YH, Won MH (2009) Arthrodesis to L5 versus S1 in long instrumentation and fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18:531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho KJ, Suk SI, Park SR, Kim JH, Kim SS, Lee TJ, Lee JJ, Lee JM (2008) Short fusion versus long fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 17:650–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coe JD, Warden KE, Herzig MA, McAfee PC (1990) Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:902–907

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cook SD, Salkeld SL, Stanley T, Faciane A, Miller SD (2004) Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone. Spine J 4:402–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Andrea LP, Betz RR, Lenke LG, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Merola A, Haher T, Harms J, Huss GK, Blanke K, McGlothlen S (2000) Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:1795–1802

    Google Scholar 

  17. Daffner SD, Vaccaro AR (2003) Adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Am J Orthop 32:77–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dawson E, Bernbeck J (1998) The surgical treatment of low back pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 9:489–495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Deviren V, Berven S, Kleinstueck F, Antinnes J, Smith JA, Hu SS (2002) Predictors of flexibility and pain patterns in thoracolumbar and lumbar idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2346–2349

    Google Scholar 

  20. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ, Ciol MA (1992) Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:536–543

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Djurasovic M, Glassman SD (2007) Correlation of radiographic and clinical findings in spinal deformities. Neurosurg Clin N Am 18:223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dvorak MF, Pitzen T, Zhu Q, Gordon JD, Fisher CG, Oxland TR (2005) Anterior cervical plate fixation: a biomechanical study to evaluate the effects of plate design, endplate preparation, and bone mineral density. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:294–301

    Google Scholar 

  23. Eck KR, Bridwell KH, Ungacta FF, Riew KD, Lapp MA, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K (2001) Complications and results of long adult deformity fusions down to l4, l5, and the sacrum. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:E182–192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Edwards CC 2nd, Bridwell KH, Patel A, Rinella AS, Jung Kim Y, Berra AB, Della Rocca GJ, Lenke LG (2003) Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis to L5 in adults: the fate of the L5-S1 disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2122–2131

    Google Scholar 

  25. Enker P, Steffee AD (1994) Interbody fusion and instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:90–101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glassman SD, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar JR (2005) Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:682–688

    Google Scholar 

  27. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2024–2029

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Coonrad RW (1988) Degenerative adult onset scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:241–245

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta MC (2003) Degenerative scoliosis: options for surgical management. Orthop Clin North Am 34:269–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Halvorson TL, Kelley LA, Thomas KA, Whitecloud TS 3rd, Cook SD (1994) Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:2415–2420

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Heary RF (2004) Evaluation and treatment of adult spinal deformity. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1:9–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT (1991) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 73:802–808

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T, Miettinen H (1994) The predictive value of preoperative myelography in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:1335–1338

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hwang DW, Jeon SH, Kim JW, Kim EH, Lee JH, Park KJ (2009) Radiographic progression of degenerative lumbar scoliosis after short segment decompression and fusion. Asian Spine J 3:58–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jackson RP, Simmons EH, Stripinis D (1989) Coronal and sagittal plane spinal deformities correlating with back pain and pulmonary function in adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:1391–1397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cho KJ, Edwards CC 2nd, Rinella AS (2006) Pseudarthrosis in adult spinal deformity following multisegmental instrumentation and arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:721–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G (2008) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2179–2184

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kostuik JP, Hall BB (1983) Spinal fusions to the sacrum in adults with scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 8:489–500

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Amor C, Lehman RA, Buchowski JM, Edwards C 2nd, Christine B (2007) Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis stopping at L5: fate of the L5-S1 disc, minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2771–2776

    Google Scholar 

  40. La Rosa G, Conti A, Cacciola F, Cardali S, La Torre D, Gambadauro NM, Tomasello F (2003) Pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: does posterior lumbar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion? J Neurosurg 99:143–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li G, Passias P, Kozanek M, Fu E, Wang S, Xia Q, Li G, Rand FE, Wood KB (2009) Adult scoliosis in patients over sixty-five years of age: outcomes of operative versus nonoperative treatment at a minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2165–2170

    Google Scholar 

  42. Marchesi DG, Aebi M (1992) Pedicle fixation devices in the treatment of adult lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:S304–309

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mariconda M, Zanforlino G, Celestino GA, Brancaleone S, Fava R, Milano C (2000) Factors influencing the outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 13:131–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Murata Y, Takahashi K, Hanaoka E, Utsumi T, Yamagata M, Moriya H (2002) Changes in scoliotic curvature and lordotic angle during the early phase of degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:2268–2273

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nasca RJ (1989) Rationale for spinal fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14:451–454

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Nash CL Jr, Moe JH (1969) A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:223–229

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Oskouian RJ Jr, Shaffrey CI (2006) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Neurosurg Clin N Am 17:299–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pateder DB, Kebaish KM, Cascio BM, Neubaeur P, Matusz DM, Kostuik JP (2007) Posterior only versus combined anterior and posterior approaches to lumbar scoliosis in adults: a radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1551–1554

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ploumis A, Transfeldt EE, Gilbert TJ Jr, Mehbod AA, Dykes DC, Perra JE (2006) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis: radiographic correlation of lateral rotatory olisthesis with neural canal dimensions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2353–2358

    Google Scholar 

  50. Polly DW Jr, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH (2006) Debate: to fuse or not to fuse to the sacrum, the fate of the L5-S1 disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:S179–184

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schwab FJ, Smith VA, Biserni M, Gamez L, Farcy JP, Pagala M (2002) Adult scoliosis: a quantitative radiographic and clinical analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:387–392

    Google Scholar 

  52. Seller K, Wahl D, Wild A, Krauspe R, Schneider E, Linke B (2007) Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies. Eur Spine J 16:1047–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Shabat S, Folman Y, Arinzon Z, Adunsky A, Catz A, Gepstein R (2005) Gender differences as an influence on patients’ satisfaction rates in spinal surgery of elderly patients. Eur Spine J 14:1027–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Simmons ED (2001) Surgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with associated scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Simmons ED Jr, Simmons EH (1992) Spinal stenosis with scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17:S117–120

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tan JS, Kwon BK, Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Oxland TR (2004) Pedicle screw motion in the osteoporotic spine after augmentation with laminar hooks, sublaminar wires, or calcium phosphate cement: a comparative analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1723–1730

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tribus CB (2003) Degenerative lumbar scoliosis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11:174–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Vanderpool DW, James JI, Wynne-Davies R (1969) Scoliosis in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:446–455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang JC, Mummaneni PV, Haid RW (2005) Current treatment strategies for the painful lumbar motion segment: posterolateral fusion versus interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:33–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Wu CH, Wong CB, Chen LH, Niu CC, Tsai TT, Chen WJ (2008) Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion for patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:310–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiuh-Lin Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, TH., Huang, TY., Lieu, AS. et al. Functional outcome analysis: instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Acta Neurochir 153, 547–555 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0909-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0909-x

Keywords

Navigation