Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Osmotic diuresis paradoxically worsens brain shift after subdural grid placement

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess for peri-operative factors associated with brain shift following craniotomy for subdural grid electrode placement.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of cases operated at a single institution was undertaken, examining 63 consecutive patients undergoing craniotomy for subdural grid placement for seizure monitoring between 2001 and 2007. Peri-operative records were reviewed in order to assess for intraoperative employment of osmotic duiresis. Postoperative MRI scans were analyzed for shift of the midline and brain displacement.

Results

One patient was excluded due to gross hemispheric atrophy confounding the midline, and four patients were excluded due to lack of available imaging. Hence 58 patients were radiographically reviewed. The employment of osmotic diuresis during grid placement appeared to be the most significant peri-operative factor influencing brain shift. Osmotic diuresis was administered in only 14 patients. Midline shift of the third ventricle was greater in the osmotic diuresis group (2.3 ± 0.3 mm vs. 1.5 ± 0.2 mm, p = 0.037). Moreover, the volume of shifted brain was significantly higher in the osmotic diuresis group (7.9 ± 0.5 cm3 vs. 4.7 ± 0.5 cm3, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the rates of neurological complications between patients who received osmotic diuresis and those who did not.

Conclusion

Employment of osmotic diuresis during grid placement appears to be associated with a paradoxical increase in the volume of shifted brain. This may be due to a combination of the resultant “sagging” of the brain and the pressure exerted by the grid, suggesting that osmotic diuresis might not improve mass effect as intended when employed within this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert GW, Dahdaleh NS, Reddy C, Hansen DR, Vogel TW, Kawasaki H, Howard MA (2009) Postoperative radiographic findings in patients undergoing intracranial electrode monitoring for medically refractory epilepsy. J Neurosurg 112(2):449–454. doi:10.3171/2009.7.JNS09838

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fountas KN, Smith JR (2007) Subdural electrode-associated complications: a 20-year experience. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 85(6):264–272. doi:10.1159/000107358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamer HM, Morris HH, Mascha EJ, Karafa MT, Bingaman WE, Bej MD, Burgess RC, Dinner DS, Foldvary NR, Hahn JF, Kotagal P, Najm I, Wyllie E, Luders HO (2002) Complications of invasive video-eeg monitoring with subdural grid electrodes. Neurology 58(1):97–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnston JM Jr, Mangano FT, Ojemann JG, Park TS, Trevathan E, Smyth MD (2006) Complications of invasive subdural electrode monitoring at St. Louis children's hospital, 1994–2005. J Neurosurg 105(5):343–347. doi:10.3171/ped.2006.105.5.343

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee WS, Lee JK, Lee SA, Kang JK, Ko TS (2000) Complications and results of subdural grid electrode implantation in epilepsy surgery. Surg Neurol 54(5):346–351. doi:S0090-3019(00)00324-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mocco J, Komotar RJ, Ladouceur AK, Zacharia BE, Goodman RR, McKhann GM 2nd (2006) Radiographic characteristics fail to predict clinical course after subdural electrode placement. Neurosurgery 58(1):120–125. doi:00006123-200601000-00013, Discussion: 120–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Onal C, Otsubo H, Araki T, Chitoku S, Ochi A, Weiss S, Elliott I, Snead OC 3rd, Rutka JT, Logan W (2003) Complications of invasive subdural grid monitoring in children with epilepsy. J Neurosurg 98(5):1017–1026. doi:10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wiggins GC, Elisevich K, Smith BJ (1999) Morbidity and infection in combined subdural grid and strip electrode investigation for intractable epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 37(1):73–80. doi:S0920121199000376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong CH, Birkett J, Byth K, Dexter M, Somerville E, Gill D, Chaseling R, Fearnside M, Bleasel A (2009) Risk factors for complications during intracranial electrode recording in presurgical evaluation of drug resistant partial epilepsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151(1):37–50. doi:10.1007/s00701-008-0171-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oren Sagher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Etame, A.B., Fox, W.C. & Sagher, O. Osmotic diuresis paradoxically worsens brain shift after subdural grid placement. Acta Neurochir 153, 633–637 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0856-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0856-6

Keywords

Navigation