Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 152, Issue 10, pp 1695–1702 | Cite as

Outcome predictors of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain

  • Yong AhnEmail author
  • Sang-Ho Lee
Clinical Article

Abstract

Purpose

Endoscopic discectomy with annuloplasty is considered as a novel minimally invasive technique for treating chronic discogenic low back pain (DLBP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome predictors and to describe technical aspects for endoscopic solutions against DLBP.

Materials and methods

We performed a prospective study of 87 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and thermal annuloplasty (PELDTA) for DLBP. The inclusion criteria were disc degenerations with annular tear confirmed by imaging studies and discography. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the outcome predictors.

Results

The 2-year follow-up rate was 90.8% (79 of 87 patients). The VAS and ODI scores at postoperative 6 months and 2 years were significantly improved (p < 0.001). Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the global outcomes were excellent in 39 out of 79 patients (49.4%), good in 17 patients (21.5%), fair in 10 patients (12.7%), and poor in 13 patients (16.5%). Therefore, the percentage of symptomatic improvement was 83.5% and the success rate (excellent or good) was 70.9%. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, the presence of concurrent disc herniation with DLBP was the most significant predictor (OR = 3.207, 95% CI 1.02–10.06, p = 0.046).

Conclusions

PELDTA may be effective for patients with chronic DLBP in selected cases. Central disc herniation causing DLBP was the most important predictor for clinical success.

Keywords

Endoscopic Lumbar Discogenic pain Disc herniation Annuloplasty 

Notes

Disclosure

This study was supported by a grant from the Wooridul Spine Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersson GB, Mekhail NA, Block JE (2006) Treatment of intractable discogenic low back pain. A systematic review of spinal fusion and intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET). Pain Physician 9:237–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrios C, Ahmed M, Arrotegui JI, Björnsson A (1990) Clinical factors predicting outcome after surgery for herniated lumbar disc: an epidemiological multivariate analysis. J Spinal Disord 3:205–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R Jr, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565–1575, discussion E387–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choy DS (1998) Percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD): twelve years’ experience with 752 procedures in 518 patients. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16:325–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, Volinn E (1991) Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health 12:141–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ergün R, Sekerci Z, Bulut H, Dolgun H (2008) Intradiscal electrothermal treatment for chronic discogenic low back pain: a prospective outcome study of 39 patients with the Oswestry disability index at 18 month follow-up. Neurol Res 30:411–416 (Epub 31 Jan 2008)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Finch PM, Price LM, Drummond PD (2005) Radiofrequency heating of painful annular disruptions: one-year outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:6–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman BJ, Davenport J (2006) Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 15(3 Suppl):S439–S447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Helm S, Hayek SM, Benyamin RM, Manchikanti L (2009) Systematic review of the effectiveness of thermal annular procedures in treating discogenic low back pain. Pain Physician 12:207–232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kapural L, Ng A, Dalton J, Mascha E, Kapural M, de la Garza M, Mekhail N (2008) Intervertebral disc biacuplasty for the treatment of lumbar discogenic pain: results of a six-month follow-up. Pain Med 9:60–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim YS, Chin DK, Yoon DH, Jin BH, Cho YE (2002) Predictors of successful outcome for lumbar chemonucleolysis: analysis of 3000 cases during the past 14 years. Neurosurgery 51(5 Suppl):S123–S128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee JH, An JH, Lee SH (2009) Comparison of the effectiveness of interlaminar and bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections in treatment of patients with lumbosacral disc herniation and spinal stenosis. Clin J Pain 25:206–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee SH, Kang HS (2010) Percutaneous endoscopic laser annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain. World Neurosurgery 73:198–206Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maurer P, Block JE, Squillante D (2008) Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) provides effective symptom relief in patients with discogenic low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:55–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mendez R, Bailey S, Paine G, Mazzilli M, Stedje-Larsen E, Nance B, Dietrick K (2005) Evaluation of the L2 spinal nerve root infiltration as a diagnostic tool for discogenic low back pain. Pain Physician 8:55–59PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mirza SK, Deyo RA (2007) Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain. Spine 32:816–823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Brandao SM, Wilkinson KM (2008) Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for low back pain in worker’s compensation patients: can it provide a potential answer? Long-term results. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:11–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 26:1873–1878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pomerantz SR, Hirsch JA (2006) Intradiscal therapies for discogenic pain. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 10:125–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saal JS, Saal JA (2000) Management of chronic discogenic low back pain with a thermal intradiscal catheter. A preliminary report. Spine 25:382–388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salenius P, Laurent LE (1977) Results of operative treatment of lumbar disc herniation. A survey of 886 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 48:630–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schwarzer AC, Aprill CN, Derby R, Fortin J, Kine G, Bogduk N (1995) The prevalence and clinical features of internal disc disruption in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 20:1878–1883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sekine M, Yamashita T, Takebayashi T, Sakamoto N, Minaki Y, Ishii S (2001) Mechanosensitive afferent units in the lumbar posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 26:1516–1521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tsou PM, Alan Yeung C, Yeung AT (2004) Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure. Spine J 4:564–573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO 3rd, Haider TT, Cammisa F, Zuchermann J, Balderston R, Kitchel S, Foley K, Watkins R, Bradford D, Yue J, Yuan H, Herkowitz H, Geiger D, Bendo J, Peppers T, Sachs B, Girardi F, Kropf M, Goldstein J (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155–1162, discussion 1163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of NeurosurgeryWooridul Spine Hospital (Daegu)DaeguSouth Korea
  2. 2.Departments of NeurosurgeryWooridul Spine Hospital (Chungdam)SeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations