Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term facial nerve function evaluation following surgery for large acoustic neuromas via retrosigmoid transmeatal approach

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

By evaluating the postoperative facial nerve function of large acoustic neuromas, the purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that influence the facial nerve function outcome and to explore the surgical strategy for large acoustic neuromas.

Methods

A retrospective study of surgical outcome was performed on 89 patients with large acoustic neuromas. All operations were performed via the retrosigmoid transmeatal approach using the intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring.

Results

Gross total resection was performed in 38 (42.7%) of the 89 patients, near total resection in 35 (39.3%), and subtotal resection in 16 (18.0%). The facial nerve was anatomically intact at the end of surgery in 83 (93.3%) patients. At 1 year after surgery, 48 (53.9%) patients had good facial nerve function (House–Brackmann (HB) Grades I–II), 23 (25.8%) patients had regular facial nerve function (HB Grades III–IV), and 18 (20.2%) patients had poor facial nerve function (HB Grades V–VI).

Conclusions

For large acoustic neuromas, the goal of complete tumor resection and preservation of acceptable facial nerve function can be attained via the retrosigmoid transmeatal approach, using the intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. The surgical strategy of near total resection is indicated for the large acoustic neuromas with severe adherence or inclusion in order to preserve facial nerve function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloch DC, Oghalai JS, Jackler RK, Osofsky M, Pitts LH (2004) The fate of the tumor remnant after less-than-complete acoustic neuroma resection. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:104–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen L, Chen L, Liu L, Ling F, Yuan X, Fang J, Liu Y (2009) Vestibular schwannoma microsurgery with special reference to facial nerve preservation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111:47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. >Devèze A, Roche PH, Facon F, Gabert K, Pellet W, Thomassin JM (2004) Functional outcomes after translabyrinthine approach for vestibular schwannomas. Neurochirurgie 50:244–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. House JW, Brackmann DE (1985) Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 93:146–147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Isaacson B, Kileny PR, El-Kashlan H, Gadre AK (2003) Intraoperative monitoring and facial nerve outcomes after vestibular schwannoma resection. Otol Neurotol 24:812–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. JSluyter S, Graamans K, Tulleken CA, Van Veelen CW (2001) Analysis of the results obtained in 120 patients with large acoustic neuromas surgically treated via the translabyrinthine–transtentorial approach. Neurosurg 94:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jung S, Kang SS, Kim TS, Kim HJ, Jeong SK, Kim SC, Lee JK, Kim JH, Kim SH, Lee JH (2000) Current surgical results of retrosigmoid approach in extralarge vestibular schwannomas. Surg Neurol 53:370–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi M, Tsunoda A, Komatsuzaki A, Yamada I (2002) Distance from acoustic neuroma to fundus and a postoperative facial palsy. Laryngoscope 112:168–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin HC, Sethi J, Lang D, Neil-Dwyer G, Lutman ME, Yardley L (2001) Patient-assessed outcomes after excision of acoustic neuroma: postoperative symptoms and quality of life. J Neurosurg 94:211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morikawa M, Tamaki N, Nagashima T, Motooka Y (2000) Long-term results of facial nerve function after acoustic neuroma surgery—clinical benefit of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. Kobe J Med Sci 46:113–124

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Reith W, Steudel WI, Schwerdtfeger K (2005) Function of the facial nerve after operative treatment of acoustic neurinomas. Influence of intraoperative monitoring. Nervenarzt 76:170–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patni AH, Kartush JM (2005) Staged resection of large acoustic neuromas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:11–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raftopoulos C, Abu Serieh B, Duprez T, Docquier MA, Guérit JM (2005) Microsurgical results with large vestibular schwannomas with preservation of facial and cochlear nerve function as the primary aim. Acta Neurochir Wien 147:697–706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roland JT Jr, Fishman AJ, Golfinos JG, Cohen N, Alexiades G, Jackman AH (2004) Cranial nerve preservation in surgery for large acoustic neuromas. Skull Base 14:85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Samii M, Gerganov VM, Samii A (2010) Functional outcome after complete surgical removal of giant vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 112:860–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Samii M, Gerganov V, Samii A (2006) Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients. J Neurosurg 105:527–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sampath P, Holliday MJ, Brem H, Niparko JK, Long DM (1997) Facial nerve injury in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery: etiology and prevention. J Neurosurg 87:60–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seol HJ, Kim CH, Park CK, Kim CH, Kim DG, Chung YS, Jung HW (2006) Optimal extent of resection in vestibular schwannoma surgery: relationship to recurrence and facial nerve preservation. Neurol Med Chir Tokyo 46:176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Veronezi RJ, Fernandes YB, Borges G, Ramina R (2008) Long-term facial nerve clinical evaluation following vestibular schwannoma surgery. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 66:194–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu H, Sterkers J (2000) Translabyrinthine removal of large acoustic neuromas in young adults. Auris Nasus Larynx 27:201–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang X, Fei Z, Chen YJ, Fu LA, Zhang JN, Liu WP, He XS, Jiang XF (2005) Facial nerve function after excision of large acoustic neuromas via the suboccipital retrosigmoid approach. J Clin Neurosci 12:405–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhigang Wang.

Additional information

Comment

The reporting of this clinical series of large vestibular schwannomas operated on by the sub occipital route has some virtues.

It demonstrates the continued usefulness of this classical surgical approach in the treatment of these tumors, one that has stood the test of time in comparison with other surgical routes also in use. It is a fast, clean, and very safe surgical approach, which creates a wide surgical corridor to work along. It provides an excellent view of all the pertinent anatomy, without the need to increase the amount of bone work (and the possible risks associated with it) required by other routes. In our experience, it also does without the need for cerebellar retraction.

The authors present us the numbers of the morbidity resulting from the resection of large (> 4cm) vestibular schwannomas in yet another large-volume center around the world. Their report is essentially centered on the function of the facial nerve. The authors have systematically used intraoperative EMG monitoring and state that they have privileged facial function over extent of resection. Indeed in the days when tumor control can be achieved with alternative methods such as radiosurgery, surgery must secure a very low risk of facial function loss. Any alternative is better than a facial palsy.

In this series, the authors had 93.3% of anatomical preservation of the facial nerve, but poor function occurred in a non-negligible 29% of patients’ immediately postoperative anatomical preservation coming down to 20% at 1 year. This discrepancy is worth commenting. Did the cases of anatomical preservation of VII also have a preserved EMG function at the end of the operation? If not, what was then the rationale to continue the resection when the EMG recording was admittedly getting worse? In the light of the author's philosophy (with which we condone) it would seem more appropriate to opt for leaving some tumor behind and preserving more facial function.

It also seems appropriate to include a word about postoperative face function restoration. The authors apparently do not advocate the use of VII/XII anastomosis for patients with irreversible complete facial palsy. Grave complications are to be expected regarding eye function among the disastrous cosmetic and functional consequences of a complete facial paralysis. The authors should be encouraged to demonstrate how they have been able to control this situation making do with only conservative measures such as drugs, acupuncture, and physical therapy.

Manuel Cunha e Sa

Almada, Portugal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, X., Wang, Z., Ji, Y. et al. Long-term facial nerve function evaluation following surgery for large acoustic neuromas via retrosigmoid transmeatal approach. Acta Neurochir 152, 1647–1652 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0705-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0705-7

Keywords

Navigation