Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Standard and limitation of intraoperative monitoring of the visual evoked potential

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Visual evoked potential (VEP) has been installed as one of the intraoperative visual function monitoring. It remains unclear, however, whether intraoperative VEP monitoring facilitates as a real time visual function monitoring with satisfactory effectiveness and sensitivity. To evaluate this, relationships between VEP waveform changes and postoperative visual function were analysed retrospectively.

Methods

Intraoperative VEP monitoring was carried out for 106 sides (eyes) in 53 surgeries, including two intraorbital, 36 parasellar and 15 cortical lesions in Shinshu University Hospital under total intravenous anaesthesia. Red light flash stimulation was provided to each eye independently. VEP recording and postoperative visual function were analysed.

Results

In 103 out of 106 sides (97%), steady VEP monitoring was recorded. Stable VEP was acquired from eyes having corrected visual acuity greater than 0.4. VEP was not recorded in one side with corrected visual acuity of 0.3 and two sides in whom sevoflurane was used incidentally for anaesthesia. Transient VEP decrease was observed in three sides, but visual function was preserved. Permanent VEP decrease was seen in seven sides, which presented visual impairment postoperatively. In one side, visual acuity improved but minor visual field defect was encountered postoperatively, though VEP unchanged throughout the surgery.

Conclusions

Intraoperative monitoring of VEP predicts postoperative visual function: reversible change in VEP means visual function to be preserved. Visual field defect without decrease in the visual acuity may not be predicted by VEP monitoring. Intraoperative VEP monitoring will be mandatory for surgeries harbouring a risk of visual impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sasaki T, Ichikawa T, Sakuma J, Suzuki K, Matsumoto M, Itakura T, Kodama N, Murakawa M (2006) Intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potentials. Masui 55:302–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sasaki T, Itakura T, Suzuki K, Kasuya H, Munakata R, Muramatsu H, Ichikawa T, Sato T, Endo Y, Sakuma J, Matsumoto M (2009) Intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potential: introduction of a clinically useful method. J Neurosurg : published online February 6, 2009; doi:10.3171/2008.9.JNS08451.

  3. Albright AL, Sclabassi RJ (1985) Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator and visual evoked potential monitoring for chiasmal gliomas in children. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 63:138–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chacko AG, Babu KS, Chandy MJ (1996) Value of visual evoked potential monitoring during trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery. Br J Neurosurg 10:275–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Costa e Silva I, Wang AD, Symon L (1985) The application of flash visual evoked potentials during operations on the anterior visual pathways. Neurol Res 7:11–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feinsod M, Selhorst JB, Hoyt WF, Wilson CB (1976) Monitoring optic nerve function during craniotomy. J Neurosurg 44:29–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goto T, Tanaka Y, Kodama K, Kusano Y, Sakai K, Hongo K (2007) Loss of visual evoked potential following temporary occlusion of the superior hypophyseal artery during aneurysm clip placement surgery. Case report. J Neurosurg 107:865–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harding GF, Bland JD, Smith VH (1990) Visual evoked potential monitoring of optic nerve function during surgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:890–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Herzon GD, Zealear DL (1994) Intraoperative monitoring of the visual evoked potential during endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111:575–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hussain SS, Laljee HC, Horrocks JM, Tec H, Grace AR (1996) Monitoring of intra-operative visual evoked potentials during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) under general anaesthesia. J Laryngol Otol 110:31–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones NS (1997) Visual evoked potentials in endoscopic and anterior skull base surgery: a review. J Laryngol Otol 111:513–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamada K, Todo T, Morita A, Masutani Y, Aoki S, Ino K, Kawai K, Kirino T (2005) Functional monitoring for visual pathway using real-time visual evoked potentials and optic-radiation tractography. Neurosurgery 57(1 Suppl):121–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kodama K, Goto T, Sato A, Sakai K, Tanaka Y, Hongo K (2008) Intraoperative monitoring of visual evoked potential for aneurysm clipping surgery. Surg Cereb Stroke 36:350–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ota T, Kawai K, Kamada K, Kin T, Saito N (2009) Intraoperative monitoring of cortically recorded visual response for posterior visual pathway. J Neurosurg : published online July 24, 2009; doi:10.3171/2009.6.JNS081272

  15. Wilson WB, Kirsch WM, Neville H, Stears J, Feinsod M, Lehman RA (1976) Monitoring of visual function during parasellar surgery. Surg Neurol 5:323–329

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright JE, Arden G, Jones BR (1973) Continuous monitoring of the visually evoked response during intra-orbital surgery. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 93:311–314

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cedzich C, Schramm J, Fahlbusch R (1987) Are flash-evoked visual potentials useful for intraoperative monitoring of visual pathway function? Neurosurgery 21:709–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cedzich C, Schramm J, Mengedoht CF, Fahlbusch R (1988) Factors that limit the use of flash visual evoked potentials for surgical monitoring. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 71:142–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cedzich C, Schramm J (1990) Monitoring of flash visual evoked potentials during neurosurgical operations. Int Anesthesiol Clin 28:165–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiedemayer H, Fauser B, ArmbrusSater W, Gasser T, Stolke D (2003) Visual evoked potentials for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring using total intravenous anesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 15:19–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wiedemayer H, Fauser B, Snddalcioglu IE, Armbruster W, Stolke D (2004) Observation on intraoperative monitoring of visual pathways using steady-state visual evoked potentials. Eur J Anesthesiol 21:429–433

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakagawa I, Hidaka S, Okada H, Kubo T, Okamura K, Kato T (2006) Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on evoked potentials during neurosurgical anesthesia. Masui 55:692–698

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Asahi 3-1-1, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan

    Kunihiko Kodama, Tetsuya Goto, Atsushi Sato, Keiichi Sakai, Yuichiro Tanaka & Kazuhiro Hongo

Authors
  1. Kunihiko Kodama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tetsuya Goto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Atsushi Sato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Keiichi Sakai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuichiro Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kazuhiro Hongo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Goto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kodama, K., Goto, T., Sato, A. et al. Standard and limitation of intraoperative monitoring of the visual evoked potential. Acta Neurochir 152, 643–648 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0600-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-010-0600-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation