Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adverse effects of topical papaverine on auditory nerve function

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Papaverine hydrochloride is a direct-acting vasodilator used to manage vasospasm during various neurosurgical operations. Transient cranial nerve dysfunction has been described in a few cases with topical papaverine. This study supports previous reports and provides neurophysiological evidence of an adverse effect on the auditory nerve.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 70 consecutive microvascular decompression operations and studied those patients who received topical papaverine for vasospasm. Topical papaverine was used as a direct therapeutic action to manage vasospasm in a total of 11 patients. The timing of papaverine application and ongoing operative events was reviewed relative to changes in neurophysiological recordings. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) were routinely used to monitor cochlear nerve function during these operations.

Findings

A temporal relationship was found between topical papaverine and BAEP changes leading to complete waveform loss. The average temporal delay between papaverine and the onset of an adverse BAEP change was 5 min. In 10 of 11 patients, BAEP waves II/III–V completely disappeared within 2 to 25 min after papaverine. Eight of these 10 patients had complete loss of BAEP waveforms within 10 min. One patient showed no recovery of later waves and a delayed profound sensorineural hearing loss. The average recovery time of BAEP waveforms to pre-papaverine baseline values was 39 min.

Conclusions

Topical papaverine for the treatment of vasospasm was associated with the onset of a transient disturbance in neurophysiological function of the ascending auditory brainstem pathway. The complete disappearance of BAEP waveforms with a consistent temporal delay suggests a possible adverse effect on the proximal eighth nerve. Recommendations to avoid potential cranial nerve deficits from papaverine are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information (2005) Bethesda, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, pp 1733–1735

  2. Ausman JI, Slavin KV, Charbel FT (1994) Pupillary changes after intracisternal injection of papaverine. Surg Neurol 41:283 (comment)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barr JD, Mathis JM, Horton JA (1994) Transient severe brainstem depression during intraarterial papaverine infusion for cerebral vasospasm. Am J Neuroradiol 15:719–723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brackmann DE, House JR 3rd, Hitselberger WE (1994) Technical modifications to the middle fossa craniotomy approach in removal of acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 15(5):614–619

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carhuapoma JR, Qureshi AI, Tamargo RJ, Mathis JM, Hanley DF (2001) Intra-arterial papaverine-induced seizures: case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 56:159–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clyde BL, Firlik AD, Kaufmann AM, Spearman MP, Yonas H (1996) Paradoxical aggravation of vasospasm with papaverine infusion following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Case report. J Neurosurg 84:690–695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenman DJ, Digoy GP, Victor JD, Selesnick SH (1999) Topical papaverine and facial nerve dysfunction in cerebellopontine angle surgery. Am J Otol 20:77–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Firlik KS, Kaufmann AM, Firlik AD, Jungreis CA, Yonas H (1999) Intra-arterial papaverine for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm following aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg Neurol 51:66–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guyton AC, Hall JE (2006) Textbook of medical physiology: eleventh ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 57–71 555–571

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hendrix LE, Dion JE, Jensen ME, Phillips CD, Newman SA (1994) Papaverine-induced mydriasis. Am J Neuroradiol 15:716–718

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lang EW, Neugebauer M, Ng K, Fung V, Clouston P, Dorsch NW (2002) Facial nerve palsy after intracisternal papaverine application during aneurysm surgery—case report. Neurol Med Chir (Toyko) 42(12):565–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Madhusudan Reddy KR, Umamaheswara Rao GS, Sastry Kolluri VR (2006) Profound hypotension after intracisternal papaverine. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 18:221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Magnon M, Calderone V, Floch A, Caverno I (1998) Influence of depolarization on vasorelaxant potency and efficacy of Ca2+ entry blockers, K+ channel openers, nitrate derivatives, salbutamol and papaverine in rat aortic rings. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 358:452–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mathis JM, DeNardo A, Jensen ME, Scott J, Dion JE (1994) Transient neurologic events associated with intraarterial papaverine infusion for subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced vasospasm. Am J Neuroradiol 15:1671–1674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McAuliffe W, Townsend M, Eskridge JM, Newell DW, Grady MS, Winn HR (1995) Intracranial pressure changes induced during papaverine infusion for treatment of vasospasm. J Neurosurg 83:430–434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McDonnell DE, Jabbari B, Spinella G, Mueller HG, Klara PM (1990) Delayed hearing loss after neurovascular decompression. Neurosurgery 27:997–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McLaughlin MR, Jannetta PJ, Clyde BL, Subach BR, Comey CH, Resnick DK (1999) Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves: lessons learned after 4400 operations. J Neurosurg 90:1–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. McLoughlin AL (1997) Intracisternal papaverine administration associated with acute onset of hyperthermia and metabolic acidosis in a craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 9:21–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller JA, Cross DT, Moran CJ, Dacey RG, McFarland JG, Diringer MN (1995) Severe thrombocytopenia following intraarterial papaverine administration for treatment of vasospasm. J Neurosurg 83:435–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morawski K, Telischi FF, Merchant F, Namyslowski G, Lisowska G, Lonsbury-Martin BL (2003) Preventing internal auditory vasospasm using topical papaverine: an animal study. Otol Neurotol 24:918–926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nadol JB, Levine R, Ojemann RG, Martuza RL, Montgomery WW, de Sandoval PK (1987) Preservation of hearing in surgical removal of acoustic neuromas of the internal auditory canal and cerebellar pontine angle. Laryngoscope 97:1287–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nordt SP (1996) Chlorobutanol toxicity. Ann Pharmacother 30:1179–1180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ohlsen KA, Didier A, Baldwin D, Miller JM, Nuttall AL, Hultcrantz E (1992) Cochlear blood flow in response to dilating agents. Hearing Research 58:19–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pool JL, Jacobson S, Fletcher TA (1958) Cerebral vasospasm. JAMA 167:1599–1607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pritz MB (1994) Pupillary changes after intracisternal injection of papaverine. Surg Neurol 41:281–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rath GP, Mukta, Prabhaker H, Dash HH, Suri A (2006) Haemodynamic changes after intracisternal papaverine instillation during intracranial aneurysmal surgery. Br J Anaesth 97:848–850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sampath P, Holliday MJ, Brem H, Niparko JK, Long DM (1997) Facial nerve injury in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma) surgery: etiology and prevention. J Neurosurg 87:60–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith WS, Dowd CF, Johnson SC, Ko NU, DeArmond SJ, Dillon WP, Setty D, Lawton MT, Young WL, Higashida RT, Halbach VV (2004) Neurotoxicity of intra-arterial papaverine preserved with chlorobutanol used for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 35:2518–2522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsurushima H, Kamezaki T, Nagatoma Y, Hyodo A, Nose T (2000) Complications associated with intraarterial administration of papaverine for vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage: two case reports. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica 40:112–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilkins RH (1993) Facial nerve decompression for hemifacial spasm. In: Apuzzo MLJ (ed) Brain Surgery. vol. 2. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 2115–2143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Disclosure statement

The authors received no financial interest or support in conjunction with this submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geraldine M. Chadwick.

Additional information

Comment

The authors of this retrospective study should be acknowledged for bringing attention of the neurosurgical community to the potential dangers of cisternal and/or topical application of Papaverine.

We share with Geraldine M Chadwick and coworkers the same practical experience. Since our training with Prof Gazi Yasargil in Zurich in the seventies, we have been using local application of Papaverine along and at the end of our surgeries, especially the ones dealing with aneurysms, skull base tumours and microvascular decompression. At the beginning of our experience we tended to widely irrigate the cisterns with Papaverine (at a dilution of 1ml in 10ml of Ringer's solution). We rapidly noticed (not rare) occurrence of side-effects as those mentioned in this well documented article, with the addition of - otherwise unexplained - epileptic focal seizures as soon as the patient awoke. In order to try to explain these harmful effects, as well as the rapid vasodilatation action of the Papaverine, we asked the chemical laboratory to measure the PH of the solution; it was found at 2.8. So, we found logical to hypothesize that a strong and acute acidose effect on vessels and neural tissue are the main agent of vasodilation and of neural (hopefully transient) toxicity. Because of its beneficial effects to prevent ischemia related to vasospastic "reflexes" after manipulating arteries, we did not abandon Papaverine along surgeries, but only used it in limited topical application with some droplets directly and selective put on the targeted vessels under the microscope (ref 2). While performing microvascular decompression at the VIIth - VIIIth cranial nerves, we could observe soon after application of Papaverine same wave depressions as the ones described in this article when Papaverine was used "in excess", but also - conversely- reversal of decrease in amplitude of peak I linked to vasospasm of AICA or labyrinthine artery when applied topically, and saving the patient from hearing loss (ref1).

Marc Sindou

University of Lyon, France

References

1. Polo G, Fisher C, Sindou M, Marneffe V (2004) Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes and warning values to prevent hearing loss. Prospective study in a consecutive series of 84 patients. Neurosurgery 54:97-106

2. Sindou M, Acevedo G(2001) Microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve. Operative Tech. Neurosurg. 4: 110-126, 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chadwick, G.M., Asher, A.L., Van Der Veer, C.A. et al. Adverse effects of topical papaverine on auditory nerve function. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150, 901–909 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0004-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0004-8

Keywords

Navigation