Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 148, Issue 3, pp 325–328 | Cite as

Improvement after treatment of hydrocephalus in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: implications for grading and prognosis

  • M. ter Laan
  • J. J. A. Mooij
Neurosurgical Concept

Summary

Two patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and hydrocephalus are presented. On admission they scored E1M4V1 and E1M3Vtube on the Glasgow Coma Scale. The first patient recovered to E3M5Vtube after treatment of hydrocpehalus by extraventricular drainage. The second recovered to E2M5Vtube and later E4M6V4 after treatment of hydrocephalus with lumbar drainage.

Based on the literature it is argued that these cases are no exception as to the improvement after treatment of hydrocephalus. The prognosis of patients with hydrocephalus after a subarachnoid haemorrhage, improves in parallel with the Glasgow Coma Scale after treatment of hydrocephalus. Therefore decision making on whether or not to treat a patient with a subarachnoid haemorrhage should be postponed until after treatment of hydrocephalus, if present.

Keywords: Subarachnoid haemorrhage; hydrocephalus; grading. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aulmann, C, Steudl, WI, Feldmann, U 1998Validierung der prognostischen Aussagekraft neurochirurgischer Aufnahmeskalen nach Rupturen zerebraler Aneurysmen.Zentralbl Neurochir59171180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, PM 1986Hydrocephalus and vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage from ruptured intracranial aneurysms.Neurosurgery181216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Botterell, EH, Lougheed, WM, Scott, JW 1956Hypothermia and interruption of carotid, or carotid and vertebral circulation in the surgical management of intracranial aneurysms.J Neurosurg13142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiang, VL, Claus, EB, Awad, IA 2000Toward more rational prediction of outcome in patients with high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgery462835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Disney, L, Weir, B, Grace, M 1988Factors influencing the outcome of aneurysm rupture in poor grade patients: a prospective series.Neurosurgery2319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Drake, C 1988Report of World Federation of Neurosurgical Surgeons Committee on a universal subarachnoid haemorrhage grading scale.J Neurosurg68985986Google Scholar
  7. Ellington, E, Margolis, G 1969Block of arachnoid villus by subarachnoid hemorrhage.J Neurosurg30651657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gotoh, O, Tamura, A, Oka, H, Tsujita, Y, Sano, K, Yasui, N, Suzuki, A, Hadeishi, H, Nihei, H, Manaka, S 1993[Acute aneurysm surgery and the Glasgow Coma Scale: relationship with 6-month outcome].No Shinkei Geka213743PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gotoh, O, Tamura, A, Yasui, N, Suzuki, A, Hadeishi, H, Sano, K 1996Glasgow Coma Scale in the prediction of outcome after early aneurysm surgery.Neurosurgery391924CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasan, D, Lindsay, KW, Vermeulen, M 1991Treatment of acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage with serial lumbar puncture.Stroke22190194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasan, D, Tanghe, HL 1992Distribution of cisternal blood in patients with acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage.Ann Neurol31374378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hasan, D, Vermeulen, M, Wijdicks, EF, Hijdra, A, van Gijn, J 1989Management problems in acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage.Stroke20747753PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Heros, RC 1989Acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage.Stroke20715717PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirai, S, Ono, J, Yamaura, A 1996Clinical grading and outcome after early surgery in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgery39441446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt, W, Hess, RM 1968Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms.J Neurosurg281420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hunt, WE, Kosnik, EJ 1974Timing and perioperative care in intracranial aneurysm surgery.Clin Neurosurg217989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kibler, R, Cough, R, Crompton, M 1961Hydrocephalus in the adult following spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage.Brain844561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Le Roux, PD, Elliott, JP, Newell, DW, Grady, MS, Winn, HR 1996Predicting outcome in poor-grade patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective review of 159 aggressively managed cases.J Neurosurg853949PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindsay, KW, Teasdale, GM, Knill-Jones, RP 1983Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage.J Neurosurg585762PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehta, V, Holness, RO, Connolly, K, Walling, S, Hall, R 1996Acute hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Can J Neurol Sci234045PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Milhorat, TH 1987Acute hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgery201520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Sullivan, MG, Sellar, R, Statham, PF, Whittle, IR 1996Management of poor grade patients after subarachnoid haemorrhage: the importance of neuroradiological findings on clinical outcome.Br J Neurosurg10445452PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Oshiro, EM, Walter, KA, Piantadosi, S, Witham, TF, Tamargo, RJ 1997A new subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system based on the Glasgow Coma Scale: a comparison with the Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scales in a clinical series.Neurosurgery41140147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rajshekhar, V, Harbaugh, RE 1992Results of routine ventriculostomy with external ventricular drainage for acute hydrocephalus following subarachnoid haemorrhage.Acta Neurochir (Wien)115814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheehan, JP, Polin, RS, Sheehan, JM, Baskaya, MK, Kassell, NF 1999Factors associated with hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgery4511201127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Steinke, D, Weir, B, Disney, L 1987Hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.Neurol Res939PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Suzuki, M, Otawara, Y, Doi, M, Ogasawara, K, Ogawa, A 2000Neurological grades of patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage improve after short-term pretreatment.Neurosurgery4710981104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Takagi, K, Tamura, A, Nakagomi, T, Nakayama, H, Gotoh, O, Kawai, K, Taneda, M, Yasui, N, Hadeishi, H, Sano, K 1999How should a subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale be determined? A combinatorial approach based solely on the Glasgow Coma Scale.J Neurosurg90680687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tamargo, RJ, Walter, KA, Oshiro, EM 1997Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: prognostic features and outcomes.New Horiz5364375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Teasdale, GM, Drake, CG, Hunt, W, Kassell, N, Sano, K, Pertuiset, B, De Villiers, JC 1988A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry511457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. van Gijn, J, Bromberg, JE, Lindsay, KW, Hasan, D, Vermeulen, M 1994Definition of initial grading, specific events, and overall outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A survey.Stroke2516231627PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. van Gijn, J, Hijdra, A, Wijdicks, EF, Vermeulen, M, van Crevel, H 1985Acute hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.J Neurosurg63355362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Yasargil, MG, Yonekawa, Y, Zumstein, B, Stahl, HJ 1973Hydrocephalus following spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. Clinical features and treatment.J Neurosurg39474479PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. ter Laan
    • 1
  • J. J. A. Mooij
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Medical Centre Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations