Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical evaluation of the polypropylene-polyester knit used as a cranioplasty material

  • Technical Evaluation
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The paper presents clinical evaluation of the polypropylene-polyester knit used as a cranioplasty material.

Material. Between year 1980 and 2002 275 cranioplastic procedures using the polypropylene-polyester plates Codubix were carried out in the Department of Neurosurgery of the Medical University of Łódź. There were 146 patients who primarily sustained head injuries and 129 non-traumatic patients with craniectomies carried out for various other reasons. In the majority of cases, i.e. in 158 patients, cranioplasty was performed later than 6 months after the primary surgery. The largest implant measured 430 cm2.

Results. Excellent and good outcome was achieved in 92% of the patients whereas the rate of local infection was 8%.

Conclusions. Codubix knitted polypropylene-polyester implant proved to be useful and a safe cranioplastic material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • KH Abbott (1953) ArticleTitleUse of frozen cranial bone flaps for autogenous and homologous grafts. J Neurosurg 10 380–388 Occurrence Handle13070062

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ME Cabenela MB Coventry CS MacCarty et al. (1970) ArticleTitleThe fate of patients with methyl methacrylate cranioplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 52B 340–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Delashaw JB Jr, Persing JA (1996) Repair of cranial defects. In: Youmans JR (ed). Neurological surgery. 4th edn, vol. 3. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders

  • SR Durham JG McComb ML Levy (2003) ArticleTitleCorrection of large >25 cm(2)) cranial defects with “reinforced” hydroxyapatite cement: technique and complications. Neurosurgery 52 IssueID4 842–845 Occurrence Handle10.1227/01.NEU.0000054220.01290.8E Occurrence Handle12657179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • BL Eppley L Hollier S Stal (2003) ArticleTitleHydroxyapatite cranioplasty: 2. Clinical experience with a new quick-setting material. J Craniofac Surg 14 IssueID2 209–214 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00001665-200303000-00014 Occurrence Handle12621292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • T Flannery RS McConnell (2001) ArticleTitleCranioplasty: why throw the bone flap out? Br J Neurosurg 15 IssueID6 518–520 Occurrence Handle10.1080/02688690120097732 Occurrence Handle11814006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WM Hammon LG Kempe (1971) ArticleTitleMethyl methacrylate cranioplasty: Thirteen years’experience with 417 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 25 69–77 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01808863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Z Kotwica M Zawirski S Andrzejak W Papierz (1991) ArticleTitleChmielowski cranioplasty of an extremely large cranial defect caused by transitional meningioma with a knitted polypropylene-polyester Prothesis “codubix”. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 112 147–150 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01405144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GN Kreider (1920) ArticleTitleRepair of cranial defect by new method. JAMA 64 1024

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw J (2000) Cranioplasty. In: Kaye AH, Black P (eds) Operative neurosurgery vol. 1. Harcourt Publishers Limited

  • Liu JK, Gottfried ON, Cole CD, Dougherty WR, Couldwell WT (2004) Porous polyethylene implant for cranioplasty and skull base reconstruction. Neurosurg Focus 15: 16(3)

  • BL Meel (2004) ArticleTitleFatal systemic allergic reaction following acrylic cranioplasty: a case report. J Clin Forensic Med 11 IssueID4 205–207 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jcfm.2004.04.004 Occurrence Handle15363754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DM Poetker KB Pytynia GA Meyer PA Wackym (2004) ArticleTitleComplication rate of transtemporal hydroxyapatite cement cranioplasties: a case series review of 76 cranioplasties. Otol Neurotol 25 IssueID4 604–609 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00129492-200407000-00031 Occurrence Handle15241242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • A Sanan JS Haines (1997) ArticleTitleRepairing holes in the head: a history of cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 40 IssueID3 588–603 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00006123-199703000-00033 Occurrence Handle9055300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • W Saringer I Nobauer-Huhmann E Knosp (2002) ArticleTitleCranioplasty with individual carbon fibre reinforced polymere (CFRP) medical grade implants based on CAD/CAM technique. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144 IssueID11 1193–1203 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00701-002-0995-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G Wurm B Tomancok K Holl J Trenkler (2004) ArticleTitleProspective study on cranioplasty with individual carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) implants produced by means of stereolithography. Surg Neurol 62 IssueID6 510–521 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.surneu.2004.01.025 Occurrence Handle15576119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andrzejak, S., Fortuniak, J., Wróbel-Wiśniewska, G. et al. Clinical evaluation of the polypropylene-polyester knit used as a cranioplasty material. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147, 973–976 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-005-0581-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-005-0581-8

Navigation