Skip to main content
Log in

Partizipation europäischer Kinder in der Medizin

Participation of European children in medicine

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Pädiatrie & Pädologie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Partizipation dient der Verbesserung der Protektion und Prävention von Krankheit und der Provision einer kindgerechten Gesundheitsversorgung. Die Umsetzung des salutogenen Partizipationsmodells beruht auf internationalen Gesetzesregelungen, die zusammen mit anderen, nationalen Regelungen Rahmenbedingungen schaffen wollen. Partizipation beruht auf bioethischen Grundlagen, die subjektive, objektive, interaktionelle und systemische Sichtweisen berücksichtigen. Partizipation setzt eine sozioethische Haltung der Behandler und ihre Kompetenz in der Kommunikation mit Kindern sowie die Entwicklung von Gesundheitskompetenz bei Kindern voraus. Partizipation von europäischen Kindern in der Medizin hat sich trotz der gesetzlichen Grundlagen bisher nicht ausreichend durchgesetzt. Es ist offensichtlich kein isoliert nationales Problem, sondern eine internationale Herausforderung. Unterschiedliche Länder, Berufsgruppen und Generationen haben verschiedene Vorstellungen von Partizipation. Die Implementierung von Partizipation in der Kindermedizin erfordert nicht nur adäquate Gesetzesregelungen, sondern eine professionelle und soziokulturelle Kompetenz – also Grundhaltung – aller Behandler sowie „empowerment“ von Kindern, um im Rahmen der medizinischen Kooperation einen Konsensus und bessere Heilungsergebnisse zu erzielen.

Abstract

Participation serves to improve protection and prevention of diseases and the provision of healthcare treatment suitable for children. The implementation of the salutogenic participation model is based on international legal regulations which together with other national regulations strive to achieve the framework conditions. Participation is based on bioethical principles which consider subjective, objective, interactional and systemic perspectives. Participation requires a socioethical behavior of the person treating, a competence in communication with children and the development of healthcare training of children. Participation of European children in medicine has not yet become sufficiently established despite the legal foundations. This is obviously not an isolated national problem but an international challenge. Different countries, professional groups and generations have different conceptions of participation. The implementation of participation in pediatric medicine requires not only adequate legal regulation but also professional and sociocultural competence, a basic prerequisite for all treating personnel and empowerment of children in order to achieve a consensus and improved curative results within the framework of medical cooperation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Beresford BA, Sloper P (2003) Chronically ill adolescents‘ experiences of communicating with doctors: a qualitative study. J Adolesc Health 33:172–179

  2. Berwick D (2013) Time to make service improvement ‚REAL‘ – ‚READ, embrace, action and learn’! BACCH Autumn Newsletter

  3. Brague R (2013) Die Konkretheit des Metaphysischen. fiph journal 21:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarke A, Robinson J, Nathawad R et al (2013) A tool for planning improvement projects and interventions for the platform implementation of the children’s rights. In: A rights- and equity-based platform and action cycle to advance child health and well-being. http://ilariasimonelli79.wix.com/think-and-action. Zugegriffen: 5. Mai 2014

  5. Coyne I (2006) Consultation with children in hospital: children, parents‘ and nurses‘ perspectives. J Clin Nurs 15:61–71

  6. Coyne I (2008) Children’s participation in consultations and decision-making at health service level: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud 45:1682–1689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cuttini M, Rebagliato M, Bortoli P et al (1999) Parental visiting, communication and participation in ethical decisions: a comparison of neonatal unit policies in Europe. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 81:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Damm L, Habeler U, Habeler W, Leiss U (2013) Besonderheiten der Kommunikation mit Kindern. In: Frischenschläger O, Hladschik-Kermer B (Hrsg) Gesprächsführung in der Medizin lernen, lehren, prüfen. Facultas wuv Verlag, Wien

  9. Davies SC, Lemer C, Strelitz J, Weil L (2013) Our children deserve better: prevention pays. Lancet 382:1383–1384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. De Lourdes Levy M, Larcher V, Kurz R (2003) Informed consent/assent in children. Statement of the Ethics Working Group of the Confederation of European Specialists in Paediatrics (CESP). Eur J Pediatr 162:629–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Deatrick JA, Angst DB, Moore C (2002) Parents‘ views of their children’s participation in phase I oncology clinical trials. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 19:114–121

  12. Donnelly M, Kilkelly U (2011) Child-friendly healthcare: delivering on the right to be heard. Med Law Rev 19:27–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dulmen van S (2004) Pediatrician-parent-child communication: problem-related or not? Patient Educ Couns 52:61–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foreman DM (1999) The family rule: a framework for obtaining ethical consent for medical interventions from children. J Med Ethics 25:491–496

  15. Guerreiro AI (2011) Relatorio de resultados: Questionario sobre concetimento informado, Acompanhamento de criancas ate 18 anos de idade visitas a doentes no internamento hospitalar. (Rep. No. Alto Comissariado da Saude e Comissao Nacional para a Saude de Crianca e do Adolescente)

  16. Lambert V, Glacken M, McCarron M (2008) ‚Visible-nedd’: the nature of communication for children admitted to a specialist children’s hospital in the republic of Ireland. J Clin Nurs 17:3092–3102

  17. Lansdown R (2014) Listening to children: have we gone too far (or not far enough)? J R Soc Med 91(9):457–561

  18. Moore L, Kirk S (2010) A literature review of children’s and young people’s participation in decisions related to health. J Clin Nurs 19:2215–2225

  19. Popow C (2014) Therapie als Partizipationschance. Paediatr Paedolog (im Druck)

  20. Pyorälä E (2004) The participation roles of children and adolescents in the dietary counseling of diabetics. Patient Educ Couns 55:385–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Runeson I, Enskar K, Elander G, Hermeren G (2001) Professionals‘ perceptions of children’s participation in decision making in healthcare. J Clin Nurs 10:70–78

  22. Runeson I, Hallström I, Elander G, Hermeren G (2002) Children’s participation in the decision making process during hospitalization: an observational study. Nurs Ethics 9:583–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Savage E, Callery P (2007) Clinic consultations with children and parents on the dietary management of cystic fibrosis. Soc Sci Med 64:363–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sloper P, Lightfoot J (2003) Involving disabled and chronically ill children and young people in health service development. Child Health Dev 29:15–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Streuli J, Michel M, Vayena E (2011) Children’s rights in pediatrics. Eur J Pediatr 170:9–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tates K, Elbers E, Meuwissen L, Bensing J (2002) Doctor-parent relationship: a ‚pas de trois’. Patient Educ Couns 48:5–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woods DM, Holl JL, Angst DB et al (2008) Gaps in pediatric clinician communication and opportunities for improvement. J Healthc Qual 30:43–45

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. J.H.H. Ehrich, L. Damm, U. Leiss, A.I. Guerreiro und S. Lenton geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.H.H. Ehrich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ehrich, J., Damm, L., Leiss, U. et al. Partizipation europäischer Kinder in der Medizin. Paediatr. Paedolog. Austria 49 (Suppl 1), 19–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00608-014-0169-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00608-014-0169-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation