Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate social responsibility disclosure prediction using LSTM neural network

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has gained a great deal of interest in recent years due to the need for information that can help many stakeholders (e.g., governments, investors, professional organizations, researchers, etc.) understand companies’ contributions to the environment and society. CSR disclosure (CSRD) is now the key source of such information when analyzing, for example, an institution’s future performance. In the current body of CSRD literature, the majority of quantitative CSRD studies have relied on traditional statistical approaches for the correlation analysis of CSRD influencing factors. In this paper, we intend to quantitatively analyze firms’ characteristics related to CSRD in Saudi Arabia, understand CSRD and its influencing factors, and predict CSRD patterns. This study lays the groundwork to help companies make informed decisions. It also helps many other stakeholders better understand CSRD’s impacts. To achieve this, we propose a deep learning framework based on long short-term memory (LSTM) for identifying and predicting CSRD patterns. Moreover, a correlation-based technique is also used to visualize the relationships between variables and identify the significant features. The dataset used in this study was collected from annual reports, CSR reports, and firms’ websites between 2015 and 2018. It contains a variety of variables to explain the CSR behaviour of 117 companies. The proposed framework is evaluated with several approaches, including logistic regression (LR), K-nearest neighbours (KNN), support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), and decision trees (DT). Compared to other machine learning models, experiment results show that LSTM achieved acceptable results with the highest accuracy of \(88_\%\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gray R, Dey C, Owen D, Evans R, Zadek S (1997) Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures. Audit Account J Account 10(3):325–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindgren C, Huq AM, Carling K (2021) Who are the intended users of CSR reports? insights from a data-driven approach. Sustainability 13(3):1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gray R, Owen D, Maunders K (1987) Corporate social reporting: accounting and accountability. Prentice-Hall International

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patten DM (1991) Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. J Account Public Policy 10(4):297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong EM, Ormiston ME, Tetlock PE (2011) The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Acad Manag J 54(6):1207–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jizi MI, Salama A, Dixon R, Stratling R (2014) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from the us banking sector. J Bus Ethics 125(4):601–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Omair Alotaibi K, Hussainey K (2016) Determinants of CSR disclosure quantity and quality: evidence from non-financial listed firms in Saudi Arabia. Int J Discl Gov 13(4):364–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Boshnak HA (2021) Determinants of corporate social and environmental voluntary disclosure in Saudi listed firms. J Financ Report Account 20:667–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Janadi Y, Rahman RA, Omar NH (2013) Corporate governance mechanisms and voluntary disclosure in Saudi Arabia. Res J Financ Account 4(4)

  10. Habbash M (2016) Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Soc Responsib J 12(4):740–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cowen SS, Ferreri LB, Parker LD (1987) The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: a typology and frequency-based analysis. Account Organ Soc 12(2):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gray R, Kouhy R, Lavers S (1995) Corporate social and environmental reporting: a review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Account Audit Accountab J 8(2):47–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guthrie J, Farneti F (2008) GRI sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organizations. Public Money Manag 28(6):361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeghal D, Ahmed SA (1990) Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by canadian firms. Account Audit Accountab J 3(1)

  15. Almars AM (2022) Attention-based bi-LSTM model for Arabic depression classification. CMC Comput Mater continua 71(2):3091–3106

    Google Scholar 

  16. Teoh T-T, Heng Q, Chia J, Shie J, Liaw S, Yang M, Nguwi Y-Y (2019) Machine learning-based corporate social responsibility prediction, In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems (CIS) and IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics (RAM), IEEE, pp. 501–505

  17. Clarkson PM, Ponn J, Richardson GD, Rudzicz F, Tsang A, Wang J (2020) A textual analysis of us corporate social responsibility reports. Abacus 56(1):3–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hackston D, Milne MJ (1996) Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Account Audit Accountab J 9(1):77–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Almars AM, Almaliki M, Noor TH, Alwateer MM, Atlam E (2022) Hann: hybrid attention neural network for detecting Covid-19 related rumors. IEEE Access 10:12334–12344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Al-Abdin A, Roy T, Nicholson JD (2018) Researching corporate social responsibility in the middle east: the current state and future directions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 25(1):47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jamali D, Karam C (2018) Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. Int J Manag Rev 20(1):32–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ortas E, Gallego-Álvarez I, Álvarez I (2019) National institutions, stakeholder engagement, and firms’ environmental, social, and governance performance. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26(3):598–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma E (2019) A review of corporate social responsibility in developed and developing nations. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26(4):712–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Balakrishnan R, Qiu XY, Srinivasan P (2010) On the predictive ability of narrative disclosures in annual reports. Eur J Oper Res 202(3):789–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Purda L, Skillicorn D (2015) Accounting variables, deception, and a bag of words: assessing the tools of fraud detection. Contemp Account Res 32(3):1193–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hummel K, Mittelbach-Hörmanseder S, Cho CH, Matten D (2017) Implicit versus explicit corporate social responsibility disclosure: A textual analysis, SSRN Electron J 3090976

  27. Loughran T, McDonald B (2011) When is a liability not a liability? textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-ks. J Financ 66(1):35–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Almars A, Li X, Zhao X (2019) Modelling user attitudes using hierarchical sentiment-topic model. Data Knowl Eng 119:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Raghupathi V, Ren J, Raghupathi W (2020) Identifying corporate sustainability issues by analyzing shareholder resolutions: a machine-learning text analytics approach. Sustainability 12(11):4753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nazari JA, Hrazdil K, Mahmoudian F (2017) Assessing social and environmental performance through narrative complexity in CSR reports. J Contemp Account Econ 13(2):166–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cho CH, Roberts RW, Patten DM (2010) The language of us corporate environmental disclosure. Acc Organ Soc 35(4):431–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muslu V, Mutlu S, Radhakrishnan S, Tsang A (2019) Corporate social responsibility report narratives and analyst forecast accuracy. J Bus Ethics 154(4):1119–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tadawul (2017) New industry classification [Press release]. https://www.tadawul.com.sa/wps/portal/tadawul/knowledge-center/about/newindustry-classification?locale

  34. Alharbi KMS (2021) The impact of the 2030 vision and firm characteristics on corporate social responsibility disclosure in Saudi Arabia, Ph.D. thesis, Victoria University

  35. Almars AM, Ibrahim IA, Zhao X, Al-Maskari S (2018) Evaluation methods of hierarchical models, In: International Conference on Advanced Data Mining and Applications, Springer, pp. 455–464

  36. Farghaly Abdelaliem SM, Alharbi KM, Baghdadi NA, Malki A (2023) Exploring the impact of private companies’ participation in health-related programs through corporate sustainable reporting. Sustainability 15(7):5906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alazzani A, Aljanadi Y, Shreim O (2018) The impact of existence of royal family directors on corporate social responsibility reporting: a servant leadership perspective. Soc Responsib J 15(1):120–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Issa A (2017) The factors influencing corporate social responsibility disclosure in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 11(10):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ding X, Qu Y, Shahzad M (2019) The impact of environmental administrative penalties on the disclosure of environmental information. Sustainability 11(20):5820

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Abdulqader M. Almars and Khalid M. Alharbi have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Computer Science and Engineering, Taibah University, 42353, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia

    Abdulqader M. Almars

  2. College of Business Administration, Taibah University, 42353, Yanbu, Saudi Arabia

    Khalid M. Alharbi

Authors
  1. Abdulqader M. Almars
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Khalid M. Alharbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulqader M. Almars.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almars, A.M., Alharbi, K.M. Corporate social responsibility disclosure prediction using LSTM neural network. Computing 106, 607–625 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-023-01239-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-023-01239-w

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Search

Navigation