Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of endpoint structure attributes on local information algorithms based on link prediction

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structural similarity based link prediction algorithms mainly exploit the information of network topology, such as links and nodes, to predict the potential links in complex networks. Among these algorithms, the local information similarity based algorithms have attracted the extensive attentions from the majority of researchers due to their low complexity and general applicability. The algorithms mainly exploit the attributes of common neighbors on the second-order transmission paths to predict the connection probability between the unconnected nodes, but ignore the structure attributes of endpoints. The structure attributes of an endpoint can be quantified as its influence resources, which make an important contribution to link prediction. To heighten the performances of local information based algorithms, this paper exploits the different structure attributes of endpoints to express the influence resources, and explores the contributions of the different endpoint attributes to local information algorithms. Extensive simulations on 12 real benchmark datasets show that, in most cases, the node degree expressing the influence resource makes the greatest contribution to improve the performances of the local information algorithms. Specifically, DCN, DAA and DRA algorithm possess the best prediction performances in 9, 5 and 7 datasets, respectively. Furthermore, compared with 6 mainstream algorithms, DRA as the best improved algorithm shows the optimal prediction performances in 8 datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of the study are as follows: http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/data/http://snap.stanford.edu/data/index.html.

References

  1. Zimek A, Filzmoser P (2018) There and back again: outlier detection between statistical reasoning and data mining algorithms. Wiley Interdiscip Rev-Data Min Knowl Discov 8:e1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alduaiji Noha, Datta Amitava, Li Jianxin (2018) Influence propagation model for clique-based community detection in social networks. IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst 5:563–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Iranzo Jaime, Pablo-Martí Federico, Aguirre Jacobo (2020) Emergence of complex socioeconomic networks driven by individual and collective interests. Phys Rev Res 2:43352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Manika Danae, Papagiannidis Savvas, Bourlakis Michael (2017) Understanding the effects of a social media service failure apology: a comparative study of customers vs. potential customers. Int J Inf Manage 37:214–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson Harold, Balaji Subash, Julie Golden (2019) Psoblap: particle swarm optimization-based bandwidth and link availability prediction algorithm for multipath routing in mobile ad hoc networks. Wirel Pers Commun 106:2261–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sudhakar S, Kanmani P, Amudha K, Raja PV, Dubey AK, Sulthana AR, Subramaniyaswamy V, Priya V (2021) Network embedding architecture using Laplace regularization-non-negative matrix factorization for virtualization. Microprocess Microsyst 81:103616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tuan Tran, Chuan Pham, Ali Mumtaz, Ngân Trn, Mittal Mamta, Son Le (2019) Fuzzy and neutrosophic modeling for link prediction in social networks. Evol Syst 10:629–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haghani Sogol, Keyvanpour Mohammad (2019) A systemic analysis of link prediction in social network. Artif Intell Rev 52:1961–1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi XY, Luo X, Shang MS, Cai XY (2017) Long-term performance of collaborative filtering based recommenders in temporally evolving systems. Neurocomputing 267:635–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Battiston F, Cencetti G, Iacopini I, Latora V, Lucas M, Patania A, Young JG, Petri G (2020) Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep-Rev Sect Phys Lett 874:1–92

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Lin, Wenbo Du, Ying Wen, Cai Kaiquan, Wang Zhen, Cao Xianbin (2018) Optimal resource allocation in interdependent networks. Physica A 508:104–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tu HC, Xia YX, Wu JJ, Zhou X (2019) Robustness assessment of cyber-physical systems with weak interdependency. Physica A 522:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Xuan-Hao, Cai Shi-Min, Wang Wei, Tang Ming, Stanley H (2018) Predicting epidemic threshold of correlated networks: a comparison of methods. Physica A 505:500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huan Hu, Zhu Chunyu, Ai Haixin, Zhang Li, Zhao Jian, Zhao Qi, Liu Hongsheng (2017) Lpi-etslp: Lncrna-protein interactions prediction using eigenvalue transformation-based semi-supervised link prediction. Mol BioSyst 13:1781–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wei Leyi, Xing Pengwei, Zeng Jiancang, Chen JinXiu, Ran Su, Guo Fei (2017) Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using novel negative samples, features, and an ensemble classifier. Artif Intell Med 83:67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Epperlein JP, Monteil J, Liu M, Gu Y, Zhuk S, Shorten R (2018) Bayesian classifier for route prediction with Markov chains. In: IEEE international conference on intelligent, pp 677–682

  17. Gadaleta M, Chiariotti F, Rossi M, Zanella A (2017) D-dash: a deep q-learning framework for dash video streaming. IEEE Trans Cogn Commun Netw 3:703–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiang ChangLe, Ding Feng, Wang Weida, He Wei, Qi Yunlong (2017) Mpc-based energy management with adaptive Markov-chain prediction for a dual-mode hybrid electric vehicle. Sci China Technol Sci 60:737–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung Jinhong, Jin Woojeong, Kang U (2020) Random walk-based ranking in signed social networks: model and algorithms. Knowl Inf Syst 62:571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin D (1998) An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: ICML, Madison 1

  21. Kaviani Sara, Sohn Insoo (2021) Application of complex systems topologies in artificial neural networks optimization: an overview. Expert Syst Appl 180:115073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vitanov Nikolay, Borisov Roumen, Vitanov Kaloyan (2021) On the motion of substance in a channel and growth of random networks. Physica A 581:126207

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Martinez V, Berzal F, Cubero JC (2017) A survey of link prediction in complex networks. ACM Comput Surv 49(69):1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng XX, Liu L, Lu LY, Zou Q (2018) Prediction of potential disease-associated micrornas using structural perturbation method. Bioinformatics 34(4):2425–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kastrin A, Ferk P, Leskosek B (2018) Predicting potential drug-drug interactions on topological and semantic similarity features using statistical learning. PLos One 13:e0196865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Goyal P, Ferrara E (2018) Graph embedding techniques, applications, and performance: a survey. Knowl-Based Syst 151:78–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu Xuzhen, Tian Hui Tian Yang, Li Han (2020) Predicting potential links via combined hybrid influence of endpoints and connectivity of quasi-local paths. Physica A 548:123850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fortunato Santo, Hric Darko (2016) Community detection in networks: a user guide. Phys Rep 659:1–44

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheroni Cristina, Manganaro Lara, Donnici Lorena, Bevilacqua Valeria, Bonnal Raoul, Rossi Riccardo, De Francesco Raffaele (2021) Novel antiviral interferon sensitive genes unveiled by correlation-driven gene selection and integrated systems biology approaches. Sci Rep 11:18043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lü Linyuan, Zhou Tao, Zhang Qian-Ming, Stanley H (2016) The h-index of a network node and its relation to degree and coreness. Nat Commun 7:10168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tian Y, Li H, Zhu XZ, Tian H (2019) Link prediction based on combined influence and effective path. Int J Mod Phys B 33:1950249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu XZ, Yang YJ, Li LX, Cai SM (2018) Link prediction in complex networks: a survey. Int J Mod Phys B 32:1850197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang YJ, Zhang JH, Zhu XZ, Tian L (2018) Link prediction via significant influence. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 492:1523–1530

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61471060).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Tian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Y., Nie, G., Tian, H. et al. Impact of endpoint structure attributes on local information algorithms based on link prediction. Computing 105, 115–129 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-022-01115-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-022-01115-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation