Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Genetic variation among and within Lithops species in Namibia

Abstract

The dwarf succulent genus Lithops is endemic to Southern Africa and of considerable conservation concern. Species delimitation is often problematic and based mainly on leaf morphology, which is strongly associated with habitat. Relationships between taxa and populations in Namibia were studied with amplified fragment length polymorphisms using 44 wild Lithops populations representing 15 species and 23 taxa. Four primer pairs produced 92 polymorphic bands in the 223 samples. Expected heterozygosity (He) within taxa ranged from 0.086 to 0.450. Genetic and geographic distances were correlated according to a Mantel test. Analysis of molecular variance showed only 23% variation among the 15 investigated species. Genetic differentiation and structuring were investigated with a principal coordinate analysis, a neighbour-joining and a Bayesian phylogeny, a Bayesian clustering analysis and a discriminant analysis of principal components. In all five analyses, L. optica and L. herrei, which differ only in flower colour, clustered closely together and are here combined under L. optica. The morphologically similar species L. amicorum and L. karasmontana clustered together. Lithops amicorum is therefore reduced to subspecific level: L. karasmontana subsp. amicorum, comb. nov. Subspecific taxa overlapped to a large extent except in L. karasmontana where 13% of the variability resided among subspecies, whereas the nominal subspecies differed from subsp. bella and subsp. eberlanzii; the latter two could not be separated and are here combined under L. karasmontana subsp. bella.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Adapted from Irish (1994). Mapping done with QGIS version 2.18.25

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Arakaki M, Christin PA, Nyffeler R, Lendel A, Eggli U, Ogburn RM, Spriggs E, Moore MJ, Edwards EJ (2011) Contemporaneous and recent radiations of the world’s major succulent plant lineages. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 108:8379–8384. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100628108

  2. Brown NE, Tischer A, Karsten MC (1931) Mesembryanthema descriptions, with chapters on cultivation and general ecology. L. Reeve and Co., Ltd., Kent

  3. Buys MH, Janse van Rensburg L-L, Mienie CMS, Barker N, Burgoyne PM, Mills L, Van Rensburg L, Hartmann H (2008) Applying AFLPs in Aizoaceae: The Delosperma herbeum complex as a case study. Biochem Syst Ecol 36:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2007.08.003

  4. Chesselet P, Burgoyne PM, Klak C, Kurzweil H, Dold AP, Griffin NJ, Smith GF (2003) Mesembryanthemaceae. In: Germishuizen G, Meyer NL (eds) Plants of southern Africa: an annotated checklist. Strelitzia 14. National Botanical Institute, Pretoria, pp 633–738

  5. Clark JY (1996) A key to Lithops N.E. Brown (Aizoaceae). Bradleya 14:1–9. https://doi.org/10.25223/brad.n14.1996.a1

  6. Cole DT (1988a) Lithops flowering stones. Acorn Books & Russel Friedman, Johannesburg

  7. Cole DT (1988b) Lithops locality data. Numerical index C001–C392, and alphabetical species index), 3rd edn. Published by author, Johannesburg

  8. Cole DT (2006) Lithops – two new taxa. Cactus & Co 10:57–59

  9. Cole DT (2012) Lithops karasmontana subsp. karasmontana var. immaculata. Cactus & Co 16:8–13

  10. Cole DT, Cole NA (2001) In: Hartmann HEK (ed) Illustrated handbook of succulent plants: Aizoaceae, F-Z. Springer, Berlin

  11. Cole DT, Cole NA (2005) Lithops flowering stones. Cactus & Co, Tradate

  12. De Boer HW, Boom BK (1961) Notities over Lithops. Succulenta 4:41–42

  13. Dray S, Dufour A-B, Thioulouse J (2007) The ade4 package II: two-table and K-table methods. R News 7:47–52

  14. Eller BM, Ruess B (1982) Water relations of Lithops plants embedded into the soil and exposed to free air. Physiol Pl 55:329–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1982.tb00300.x

  15. Ellis AG, Weis AE, Gaut BS (2006) Evolutionary radiation of “stone plants” in the genus Argyroderma (Aizoaceae): unravelling the effects of landscape, habitat, and flowering time. Evolution 60:39–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01080.x

  16. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molec Ecol 14:2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02553x

  17. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2007) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Molec Ecol Notes 7:574–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758x

  18. Hammer SA (1999) Lithops treasures of the veld. British Cactus and Succulent Society, Norwich

  19. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754

  20. Irish J (1994) The biomes of Namibia, as determined by objective categorisation. Navorsinge Natl Mus Bloemfontein 10:550–591

  21. IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge

  22. Jainta H (2017) Wild Lithops. Klaus Hess publisher, Göttingen

  23. Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F (2010) Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet 11:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-94

  24. Kellner A, Ritz CM, Schlittenhardt P, Hellwig FH (2011) Genetic differentiation in the genus Lithops L. (Ruschioideae, Aizoaceae) reveals a high level of convergent evolution and reflects geographic distribution. Pl Biol 13:368–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00354.x

  25. Klaassen ES, Kwembeya EG (eds) (2013) A Checklist of Namibian indigenous and naturalised plants. Occasional Contributions No. 5. National Botanical Research Institute, Windhoek

  26. Klak C, Khunou A, Reeves G, Hedderson T (2003) A phylogenetic hypothesis for the Aizoaceae (Caryophyllales) based on four plastid DNA regions. Amer J Bot 90:1433–1445. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.10.1433

  27. Klak C, Reeves G, Hedderson T (2004) Unmatched tempo of evolution in Southern African semi-desert ice plants. Nature 427:63–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02243

  28. Klak C, Bruyns PV, Hanáček P (2013) A phylogenetic hypothesis for the recently diversified Ruschieae (Aizoaceae) in southern Africa. Molec Phylogen Evol 69:1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.05.030

  29. Koopman WJM, Vosman B, Sabatino GJH, Visser D, Van Huylenbroeck J, De Riek J, De Cock K, Wissemann V, Ritz CM, Maes B, Werlemark G, Nybom H, Debener T, Linde M, Smulders MJM (2008) AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships in the genus Rosa (Rosaceae). Amer J Bot 95:353–366. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.95.3.353

  30. Loots S (2005) Red data book of Namibian plants. Southern African Botanical Diversity Report No. 38. SABONET, Pretoria and Windhoek

  31. Loots S (2011) National conservation assessment and management of two Namibian succulents, with specific reference to the Rössing Uranium Mine. Report on a partnership project between the National Botanical Research Institute of Namibia, Rössing Uranium Limited, the Rio Tinto Group and the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. (Unpublished)

  32. Loots S, Nybom H (2017) Towards better risk assessment for conservation of flowering stones: Plant density, spatial pattern and habitat preference of Lithops pseudotruncatella in Namibia. S African J Bot 109:112–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.12.023

  33. Loots S, Ritz CM, Schwager M, Sehic J, Garkava-Gustavsson L, Herklotz V, Nybom H (2019) Distribution, habitat profile and genetic variability of Namibian succulent Lithops ruschiorum. Bothalia 49:1–18. https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v49i1.2408

  34. Nel GC (1946) Lithops. University Press, Stellenbosch

  35. Nybom H (2004) Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plants. Molec Ecol 13:1143–1155

  36. Nybom H, Bartish IV (2000) Effects of life history traits and sampling strategies on genetic diversity estimates obtained with RAPD markers in plants. Perspect Pl Ecol Evol Syst 3:93–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365.294x2004.02141

  37. Peakall R, Smouse P (2012) GENALEX 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460

  38. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959

  39. QGIS Development Team (2018) QGIS Geographic Information System vers. 2.18.25. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. Available at: http://qgis.osgeo.org. Accessed 21 Dec 2018

  40. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/

  41. Ritz CM, Fickenscher K, Foeller J, Hermann K, Mecklenburg R, Wahl R (2016) Molecular phylogenetic relationships of the Andean genus Aylostera Speg. (Cactaceae, Trichocereeae), a new classification and a morphological identification key. Pl Syst Evol 302:763–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-016-1296-4

  42. Rosenberg NA (2004) DISTRUCT: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molec Ecol Notes 4:137–138. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x

  43. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotech 18:233–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/72708

  44. Schwantes G (1957) Flowering stones and mid-day flowers. Ernest Benn Limited, London

  45. Swofford DL (2002) Paup* 4.0. Phylogenetic analyses using parsimony (and other methods), 4th edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

  46. Turner JS, Picker MD (1993) Thermal ecology of an embedded dwarf succulent from southern Africa (Lithops spp.: Mesembryanthemaceae). J Arid Environm 24:361–385. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1993.1031

  47. Van Jaarsveld E (1987) The succulent riches of South Africa and Namibia. Aloe 24:45–92

  48. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl Acids Res 23:4407–4414. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.21.4407

  49. Wallace RS (1990) Systematic significance of allozyme variation in the genus Lithops (Mesembryanthemaceae). Mitt Inst Allg Bot Hamburg 23:509–524

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support was received from the SADC Plant Genetic Resources Centre (SPGRC) in Lusaka, Zambia and the Swedish International Development and Cooperation Agency (Sida). Technical support was received from the Senckenberg Biodiversitäts- und Klimaforschungszentrum, Germany (SBik-F) and assistance with statistical analyses from V. Herklotz and advices in taxonomic treatments from V. Otte (Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, Germany). Technical, administrative and financial support was received from the Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Forestry of Namibia and especially staff at the National Botanical Research Institute (Windhoek, Namibia). The Ministry of Environment and Tourism of Namibia granted research and entry permits into National Parks. Rössing Uranium Mine, Husab Uranium mine, Langer Heinrich Mine, Namdeb Diamond mine and Scorpion Zinc mine granted access and assistance in their license areas. The late Tok Schoeman, Hilde and Frikkie Mouton (Namibia), Roy Earle (UK) and Keith Green (UK) provided information about localities. Lize von Staden of the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) and the Threatened Species Programme, Pieter van Wyk from South African National Parks (SANParks) and the Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildlife (CREW), South Africa, are acknowledged for data to re-assess Lithops optica/L. herrei. This work would not have been possible without the Namibian farm owners who granted access to their farms and provided assistance: Mr and Ms G.S. Berg, Ms B. Boehm-Erni, C. Buhrman, W. Diergaardt, L. Gessert, J. and S. Hopkins, B. and L. Eksteen, H. Esterhuizen, W. Itzko, Ms. Koch, A. Louw, J. and J. van Niekerk, Mr. I and Ms. du Plooy (Farm Garub), N. and C. Pretorius, H and O. Pretorius, A. Rusch, F. Snyman, B.N. and J. Steyn, P. and W. Swiegers, W. Teubner, G.G. Viviers, D. De Wet, R. and R. von Wielich.

Author information

Correspondence to Sonja Loots.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Handling Editor: Christian Parisod.

Electronic supplementary material

Information on Electronic Supplementary Material

Information on Electronic Supplementary Material

Online Resource 1. Description of each population of Lithops in Namibia from which material for DNA samples was collected.

Online Resource 2. List of voucher specimens collected from populations where DNA collections were made.

Online Resource 3. Distribution of log likelihood of ten replicates across different models (K = 1–15) computed with Bayesian clustering (a), distribution of ΔK based on the rate of change in log probability according to the method described by Evanno et al. (2005) (b), and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) across different models of the DAPC analysis (c).

Online Resource 4. Unrooted Bayesian phylogeny of Lithops based on 92 polymorphic AFLP fragments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loots, S., Nybom, H., Schwager, M. et al. Genetic variation among and within Lithops species in Namibia. Plant Syst Evol 305, 985–999 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-019-01619-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Aizoaceae
  • Molecular marker
  • Phylogenetics
  • Succulent
  • Taxonomy