Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 302, Issue 3, pp 257–264 | Cite as

Population differentiation and phenotypic plasticity in temperature response of bud burst in Frangula alnus provenances of different latitude

  • Kristine Vander MijnsbruggeEmail author
  • Arion Turcsán
  • Boudewijn Michiels
Original Article

Abstract

Flushing in spring marks an important adaptive process in a tree’s growth cycle. We studied bud burst in three provenances of a common small tree Frangula alnus Mill., originating from Italy, Belgium and Sweden. We observed timing of bud burst and leaf senescence in a common garden, and timing and duration of bud burst in greenhouse conditions (cuttings) with different temperature regimes, all located in Belgium. The early bud burst response of the southern European provenance together with the later leaf senescence compared to the local provenance indicated population differentiation that may, at least partly, be driven by local adaptation to a longer growing season. The duration of the process was longer in the cold greenhouse compared to the local provenance, whereas it responded similar as the local provenance in the warm greenhouse, suggesting adaptation to warmer conditions. Unexpectedly, the northern European provenance expressed a plastic reaction to warmer temperatures in the field trial and in the greenhouse conditions flushing in both cases earlier than the local provenance. The duration of the process in the warm greenhouse compared to the local provenance was shorter, whereas in the cold greenhouse it was similar. This result again suggested that not only the onset, but also the duration of the bud burst process was a plastic reaction to the warmer conditions compared to its site of origin. Together, our results suggest two mechanisms driving bud burst in F. alnus provenances, a co-gradient and a counter-gradient variation depending on the latitude of origin.

Keywords

Cumulative logistic mixed models Bud burst Leaf senescence Local adaptation Phenotypic plasticity Temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We like to thank Hanne De Kort for sample collection. We also thank Stefaan Moreels for all the nursery work and André Meersman for field evaluations.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alberto F, Aitken S, Alía R, González-Martínez S, Hänninen H, Kremer A, Lefèvre F, Lenormand T, Yeaman S, Whetten R, Savolainen O (2013) Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change—evidence from tree populations. Glob Change Biol 19:1645–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberto F, Bouffier L, Louvet JM, Lamy JB, Delzon S, Kremer A (2011) Adaptive responses for seed and leaf phenology in natural populations of sessile oak along an altitudinal gradient. J Evol Biol 24:1442–1454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Basler D, Körner C (2014) Photoperiod and temperature responses of bud swelling and bud burst in four temperate forest tree species. Tree Physiol. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu021 Google Scholar
  4. Bennie J, Kubin E, Wiltshire A, Huntley B, Baxter R (2010) Predicting spatial and temporal patterns of bud-burst and spring frost risk in north-west Europe: the implications of local adaptation to climate. Glob Change Biol 16:1503–1514. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertin RI (2008) Plant phenology and distribution in relation to recent climate change. J Torrey Bot Soc 135:126–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caffarra A, Donnelly A (2011) The ecological significance of phenology in four different tree species: effects of light and temperature on bud burst. Int J Biometeorol 55:711–721. doi: 10.1007/s00484-010-0386-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceulemans R, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Wiard JH, Braatne BM, Hinckley TM, Stettler RF, Isebrands JG, Heilman PE (1992) Production physiology and morphology of Populus species and their hybrids grown under short rotation. I. Clonal comparisons of 4-year growth and phenology. Canad J Forest Res 22:1937–1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen RHB (2013) Ordinal: regression models for ordinal data. R package version 2013.10-31. Available at: http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/. Accessed 1 Nov 2014
  9. DeBell DS, Harrington CA, Clendenen GW, Zasada JS (1997) Tree growth and stand development of four Populus clones in large monoclonal plots. New Forest 14:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ducousso A, Guyon JP, Kremer A (1996) Latitudinal and altitudinal variation of bud burst in western populations of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Ann Sci Forest 53:775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hannerz M (1999) Evaluation of temperature models for predicting bud burst in Norway spruce. Canad J Forest Res 29:9–19. doi: 10.1139/Cjfr-29-1-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hannerz M, Ekberg I, Norell L (2003) Variation in chilling requirements for completing bud rest between provenances of Norway spruce. Silvae Genet 52:161–168Google Scholar
  13. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunter MD (1992) A variable insect–plant interaction: the relationship between tree bud burst phenology and population levels of insect herbivores among trees. Ecol Entomol 16:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kremer A, Ronce O, Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Guillaume F, Bohrer G, Nathan R, Bridle JR, Gomulkiewicz R, Klein EK, Ritland K, Kuparinen A, Gerber S, Schueler S (2012) Long-distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change. Ecol Letters 15:378–392. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laikre L, Schwartz MK, Waples RS, Ryman N (2010) Compromising genetic diversity in the wild: unmonitored large-scale release of plants and animals. Trends Ecol Evol 25:520–529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S, Kremer A, Barbati A, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Seidl R, Delzon S, Corona P, Kolstrom M, Lexer MJ, Marchetti M (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecol Managem 259:698–709. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matesanz S, Gianoli E, Valladares F (2010) Global change and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann New York Acad Sci 1206:35–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matesanz S, Valladares F (2014) Ecological and evolutionary responses of Mediterranean plants to global change. Environm Exp Bot 103:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Medan D (1994) Reproductive biology of Frangula alnus Miller in southern Spain. Pl Syst Evol 193:173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKay JK, Christian CE, Harrison S, Rice KJ (2005) “How local is local?”—a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration. Restorat Ecol 13:432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McKown AD, Guy RD, Klapste J, Geraldes A, Friedmann M, Cronk QCB, El-Kassaby YA, Mansfield SD, Douglas CJ (2014) Geographical and environmental gradients shape phenotypic trait variation and genetic structure in Populus trichocarpa. New Phytol 201:1263–1276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray M, Cannell M, Smith R (1989) Date of budburst of fifteen tree species in Britain following climatic warming. J Appl Ecol 26:693–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR (1997) Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386:698–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Neale DB, Kremer A (2011) Forest tree genomics: growing resources and applications. Nat Rev Genet 12:111–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Oleksyn J, Modrzynski J, Tjoelker MG, Zytkowiak R, Reich PB, Karolewski P (1998) Growth and physiology of Picea abies populations from elevational transects: common garden evidence for altitudinal ecotypes and cold adaptation. Funct Ecol 12:573–590. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olson MS, Levsen N (2012) Classic clover cline clues. Molec Ecol 21:2315–2317. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olsson C, Bolmgren K, Lindstrom J, Jonsson AM (2013) Performance of tree phenology models along a bioclimatic gradient in Sweden. Ecol Modelling 266:103–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.06.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. R Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 1 Nov 2014
  30. Robson TM, Alia R, Bozic G, Clark J, Forsteuter M, Gomory D, Liesebach M, Mertens P, Rasztovits E, Zitova M, vonWuhlisch G (2011) The timing of leaf flush in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) saplings. Genetic resources of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) for sustainable forestry, Proceedings of the COST E52 final meeting, Serie Forestal 22:61–80Google Scholar
  31. Robson TM, Rasztovits E, Aphalo PJ, Alia R, Aranda I (2013) Flushing phenology and fitness of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) provenances from a trial in La Rioja, Spain, segregate according to their climate of origin. Agric Forest Meteorol 180:76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rohde A, Bastien C, Boerjan W (2011) Temperature signals contribute to the timing of photoperiodic growth cessation and bud set in poplar. Tree Physiol 31:472–482. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rousi M, Pusenius J (2005) Variations in phenology and growth of European white birch (Betula pendula) clones. Tree Physiol 25:201–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T, Knürr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:595–619. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095646 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seppälä R, Buck A, Katila P (2009) Adaptation of forests and people to climate change. A global assessment report, vol 22. IUFRO World Series, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  36. Soularue JP, Kremer A (2012) Assortative mating and gene flow generate clinal phenological variation in trees. BMC Evol Biol. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-79 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tanino KK, Kalcsits L, Silim S, Kendall E, Gray GR (2010) Temperature-driven plasticity in growth cessation and dormancy development in deciduous woody plants: a working hypothesis suggesting how molecular and cellular function is affected by temperature during dormancy induction. Pl Molec Biol 73:49–65. doi: 10.1007/s11103-010-9610-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vander Mijnsbrugge K, Bischoff A, Smith B (2010) A question of origin: where and how to collect seed for ecological restoration. Basic Appl Ecol 11:300–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vander Mijnsbrugge K, Onkelinx T, De Cuyper B (2015) Variation in bud burst and flower opening responses of local versus non-local provenances of hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jacq.) in Belgium. Pl Syst Evol 301:1171–1179. doi: 10.1007/s00606-014-1141-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vitasse Y, Bresson CC, Kremer A, Michalet R, Delzon S (2010) Quantifying phenological plasticity to temperature in two temperate tree species. Funct Ecol 24:1211–1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vitasse Y, Delzon S, Bresson CC, Michalet R, Kremer A (2009) Altitudinal differentiation in growth and phenology among populations of temperate-zone tree species growing in a common garden. Canad J Forest Res 39:1259–1269. doi: 10.1139/X09-054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. vonWuehlisch G, Krusche D, Muhs HJ (1995) Variation in temperature sum requirement for flushing of beech provenances. Silvae Genet 44:343–346Google Scholar
  43. Williams M, Dumroese R (2014) Assisted migration: what it means to nursery managers and tree planters. Tree Planters’ Notes 57:21–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristine Vander Mijnsbrugge
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Arion Turcsán
    • 1
    • 3
  • Boudewijn Michiels
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute for Nature and ForestGeraardsbergenBelgium
  2. 2.Agency for Nature and ForestBrusselBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Biometrics and Agricultural InformaticsCorvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations