Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Phylogenetic relationship of wild and cultivated yam species (Dioscorea spp.) of India inferred from PCR–RFLP analysis of two cpDNA loci

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The genus Dioscorea comprises approximately 600 species worldwide and about 50 in India. Dioscorea is economically very useful because of its food and medicinal value. Polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP) analysis was employed to study interspecific relationship between four cultivated and thirteen wild species belonging to seven taxonomical sections found in India. Restriction digestion analysis was performed for the amplified products of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) loci psbA–trnH and trnL-F regions. Out of 17 restriction endonucleases tested, 5 endonucleases had restriction sites in psbA–trnH region and 6 endonucleases had restriction sites in trnL-F region. Digestion of amplified products with these restriction endonucleases showed 70 fragments of which 62 fragments (88 %) were polymorphic. Dendrogram obtained from UPGMA cluster analysis of two combined loci shows D. bulbifera of section Opsophyton to be closely placed with species of sect. Enantiophyllum. High similarity values obtained in this study between D. pentaphylla (sect. Botrysicyos) and D. esculenta (sect. Combilium) support their common origin. The average of genetic similarities between the ten species of Enantiophyllum section was 82.3 % showing their closeness. The present study suggests that the less studied New World species, D. floribunda (sect. Heterostemon) could have evolved from old world section, Lasiophyton. The principal component analysis (PCA) obtained from data of the two loci shows D. deltoidea of sect. Stenophora to be an outgroup. Interspecific genetic similarities showed D. deltoidea with low similarity values ranging from 27.5 to 37.5 % compared with other species and was, therefore, the most divergent species. D. deltoidea of section Stenophora shows distinctness because of its primitive characters. This study, therefore, establishes species relationships between wild and cultivated yams of India which would help in yam crop improvement programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Alexander J, Coursey DG (1969) The origins of yam cultivation. In: Ucko PJ, Dimbleby GH (eds) The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. Duckworth Publishers, London, pp 405–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunk CF, Jones KC, James TW (1979) Assay for nanogram quantities of DNA in cellular homogenates. Anal Biochem 92:497–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkill IH (1960) The organography and the evolution of the Dioscoreaceae, the family of the yams. J Linn Soc Lond Bot 56:319–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caddick LR, Wilkin P, Rudall PJ, Chase MW, Hedderson TAJ (2002) A formal revised classification of Dioscoreales. Taxon 51:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chair H, Perrier X, Agbangla C, Marchand JL, Dainou O, Noyer JL (2005) Use of cpSSRs for the characterization of yam phylogeny in Benin. Genome 48:674–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chin HC, Chang MC, Ling PP, Ting CT, Dou FP (1985) A cytotaxonomic study on Chinese Dioscorea L.—the chromosome numbers and their relation to the origin and evolution of the genus. Acta Phytotaxon Sinica 23:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg MT, Zurawski G (1992) Chloroplast DNA and the study of plant phylogeny. In: Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ (eds) Molecular systematics of plants. Chapman and hall, London, pp 1–13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg MT, Learn GH, Golenberg EM (1991) Molecular evolution of chloroplast DNA. In: Selander et al. (eds) Evolution at the molecular level. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, pp 135–149

  • FAO (2002) FAOSTAT agriculture data. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. http://apps.fao.org/collections

  • Fitter JT, Rose RJ (1993) Investigation of chloroplast DNA heteroplasmy in Medicago sativa L. using cultured tissue. Theor Appl Genet 86:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao X, Zhu YP, Wu BC, Zhao YM, Chen JQ, Hang YY (2008) Phylogeny of Dioscorea sect. stenophora based on chloroplast matK, rbcL and trnL-F sequences. J Syst Evol 46:315–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelles recherchés sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaudoise Sci Nat 44:223–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SC, Crawford DJ, Jansen RK, Guerra AS (1999) The use of a non-coding region of chloroplast DNA in phylogenetic studies of the subtribe Sonchinae (Asteraceae: Lactuceae). Pl Syst Evol 215:85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malapa R, Arnau G, Noyer JL, Lebot V (2005) Genetic diversity of the greater yam (Dioscorea alata L.) and relatedness to D. nummularia Lam. and D. transversa Br. as revealed with AFLP markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:919–929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin FW (1969) The species of Dioscorea containing sapogenin. Econ Bot 23:373–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mignouna HD, Abang MM, Wanyera NW, Chikaleke VA, Asiedu R, Thottappilly G (2005) PCR marker-based analysis of wild and cultivated yams (Dioscorea spp.) in Nigeria: genetic relationships and implications for ex situ conservation. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:755–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto MM, Fitch MW (1995) Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. System Biol 44:64–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee P, Bhat KV (2013) Study on Dioscorea spp. phylogeny based on psbA–trnH and trnL-F sequences. Genet Resour and Crop Evol (communicated)

  • Nino J, Diez MJ, Nuez F (2006) Molecular variability of a collection of Dioscorea poygonoides (Willd.) Humb. and Bonpl. (wild yam) of the Gran Caldas region (Colombia) using AFLPs. J Hort Sci and Biotechnology 81:803–808

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pei C, Ting CT, Chin HC, Su P, Tang SY, Chang HC (1979) A preliminary systematic study of Dioscorea L. Sect. Stenophora Uline. Acta Phytotaxon Sinica 17:61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Prain D, Burkill IH (1936) An account of the genus Dioscorea in the East. Ann R Bot Gard, Calcutta. Longman, London, UK

  • Rohlf FJ (1993) NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, version 1.70. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York

  • Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgenson RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:8014–8018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning—a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang T (2002) Utility of low-copy nuclear gene sequences in plant phylogenetics. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 37:121–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling EE (1997) Phylogenetic analysis of Helianthus (Asteraceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction-site data. Theor Appl Genet 94:925–933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schols P, Furness CA, Wilkin P, Fls Smets E, Cielen V, Huysmans S (2003) Pollen morphology of Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) and its relation to systematics. Bot J Linn Soc 143:375–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Su P (1987) Pollen morphology of Dioscorea in China. Acta Phytotaxon Sinica 25:357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet PT, Gielly L, Patou G, Bouvet J (1991) Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol Biol 17:1105–1109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terauchi R, Terachi T, Tsunewaki K (1991) Intraspecific variation of chloroplast DNA in Dioscorea bulbifera L. Theor Appl Genet 81:461–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terauchi R, Chikaleke VA, Thottapilli G, Hahn SH (1992) Origin and phylogeny of Guinea yam as revealed by RFLP analysis of chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Theor Appl Genet 83:743–751

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wendel JF, Doyle JJ (1998) Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genomes history and molecular evolution. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ (eds) DNA sequencing. Kluwer Academic Publications, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Xifreda CC (2000) Evaluation of pollen and vegetative characters in the systematics of South American species of Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae). In: Wilson KL, Morrison DA (eds) Monocots: systematics and evolution. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, pp 488–496

Download references

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the Director, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, for the facilities provided and extending his support during this research programme. Papiya Mukherjee acknowledges the receipt of Junior Research Fellowship for her PhD work from University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research Centre on DNA Fingerprinting, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India

    Papiya Mukherjee & K. V. Bhat

  2. Department of Genetics, Agharkar Research Institute, G. G. Agarkar Road, Pune, 411004, Maharashtra, India

    Papiya Mukherjee

Authors
  1. Papiya Mukherjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. V. Bhat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Papiya Mukherjee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mukherjee, P., Bhat, K.V. Phylogenetic relationship of wild and cultivated yam species (Dioscorea spp.) of India inferred from PCR–RFLP analysis of two cpDNA loci. Plant Syst Evol 299, 1587–1597 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0847-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0847-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation