Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized and complementary pollination system in the Andean cactus Echinopsis schickendantzii

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The considerable floral diversity present in the cactus family has often been associated with the specificity of its pollinators. However, many cactus pollination systems are generalized as their flowers are pollinated by a wide spectrum of animals. For example, cactus species with white flowers, nocturnal anthesis and extended floral cycles would present generalized pollination systems in which both nocturnal and diurnal visitors could be effective pollinators. In this article, we tested this hypothesis by studying the pollination biology of Echinopsis schickendantzii, an Andean cactus with sphingophilous flowers. In addition, we evaluated whether the cactus’s pollination system is complementary or redundant regarding the relative contributions of nocturnal and diurnal pollinators. Specifically, we studied the floral cycle, the reproductive system and the pollination effectiveness of floral visitors. The flowers of E. schickendantzii are self-incompatible; they opened at crepuscule and have an extended floral cycle. Moths were frequent visitors at night, whereas bees were frequent visitors during the day; both were effective pollinators of the cactus. Our results indicated that the flowers of this species present phenotypic, functional and ecological generalization, and their fruit set is determined by the contributions of both pollinator functional groups, i.e., they have complementary pollination systems. These results support the hypothesis that cacti in the extra-tropical deserts of South America have generalized pollination systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Agresti A (1990) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi AR (1996) Temperaturas medias estimadas para la región noroeste de Argentina. INTA, Salta

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi AR, Yañez CE (1992) Las precipitaciones en el noroeste argentino. INTA, Salta

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustamante E, Casas A, Búrquez A (2010) Geographic variation in reproductive success of Stenocereus thurberi (Cactaceae): effects of pollination timing and pollinator guild. Am J Bot 97:2020–2030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Tapia R, Molina-Freaner F (2004) Reproductive ecology of the rare clonal cactus Stenocereus eruca in the Sonoran Desert. Plant Syst Evol 247:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Viana ML, Ortega-Baes P, Saravia M, Badano E, Schlumpberger BO (2001) Biología floral y polinizadores de Trichocereus pasacana (Cactaceae) en el Parque Nacional Los Cardones, Argentina. Rev Biol Trop 49:279–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2010) InfoStat versión 2010. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:375–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming TH, Shaley CT, Holland JN, Nason JD, Hamrick JL (2001) Sonoran desert columnar cacti and the evolution of generalized pollination systems. Ecol Monogr 71:511–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godínez-Alvarez HO, Valverde T, Ortega-Baes P (2003) Demographic trends in the Cactaceae. Bot Rev 69:173–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guitian P, Guitian J, Navarro L (1993) Pollen transfer and diurnal versus nocturnal pollination in Lonicera etrusca. Acta Oecol 14:219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt D (2006) The new cactus lexicon. Remous Ltd, Milborne Port

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennersten O, Morse DH (1991) The quality of pollination by diurnal and nocturnal insects visiting common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca. Am Midl Nat 125:18–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesling R (1978) El género Trichocereus (Cactaceae): I. Las especies de la República Argentina. Darwiniana 21:263–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrea-Alcázar DM, López RP (2011) Pollination biology of Oreocereus celsianus (Cactaceae), a columnar cactus inhabiting the high subtropical Andes. Plant Syst Evol 295:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandujano MC, Carrillo-Angeles I, Martínez-Peralta C, Golubov J (2010) Reproductive biology of Cactaceae. In: Ramawat KG (ed) Desert plants: biology and biotechnology. Springer, Berlin, pp 157–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake T, Yahara T (1998) Why does the flower of Lonicera japonica open at dusk? Can J Bot 76:1806–1811

    Google Scholar 

  • Munguía-Rosas MA, Sosa VJ, Ojeda MM, De-Nova JA (2009) Specialization clines in the pollination systems of agaves (Agavaceae) and columnar cacti (Cactaceae): a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis. Am J Bot 96:1887–1895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ollerton J, Killick A, Lamborn E, Watts S, Whiston M (2007) Multiple meanings and modes: on the many ways to be a generalist flower. Taxon 56:717–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E (2002) The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann Mo Bot Gard 89:199–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Baes P, Godínez-Alvarez H (2006) Global diversity and conservation priorities in the Cactaceae. Biodivers Conserv 15:817–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Baes P, Aparicio M, Galíndez G (2010a) Vivipary in the cactus family: an evaluation of 25 species from northwestern Argentina. J Arid Environ 74:1359–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Baes P, Aparicio-González M, Galíndez G, del Fueyo P, Sühring S, Rojas-Aréchiga M (2010b) Are cactus growth forms related to germination responses to light? A test using Echinopsis species. Acta Oncol 36:339–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Baes P, Sühring S, Sajama J, Sotola E, Alonso-Pedano M, Bravo S, Godínez-Alvarez H (2010c) Chapter 8: diversity and conservation in the cactus family. In: Ramawat KG (ed) Desert plants: biology and biotechnology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 157–173

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Baes P, Galíndez G, Sühring S, Rojas-Aréchiga M, Daws MI, Pritchard HW (2011a) Seed germination of Echinopsis schickendantzii (Cactaceae): the effects of constant and alternating temperatures. Seed Sci Technol 39:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega-Baes P, Saravia M, Sühring S, Godínez-Alvarez H, Zamar M (2011b) Reproductive biology of Echinopsis terscheckii (Cactaceae): the role of nocturnal and diurnal pollinators. Plant Biol 13:33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ossa CG, Medel R (2011) Notes on the floral biology and pollination syndrome of Echinopsis chiloensis (Colla) Friedrich & G.D. Rowley (Cactaceae) in a population of semiarid Chile. Gayana Bot 68(2):213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimienta-Barrios E, del Castillo RF (2002) Reproductive biology. In: Nobel PS (ed) Cacti. Biology and Uses. University of California Press, Los Angeles, pp 163–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahley CT (1996) Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae). Am J Bot 83:329–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlumpberger BO, Badano E (2005) Diversity of floral visitors to Echinopsis atacamensis ssp. pasacana (Cactaceae). Haseltonia 11:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlumpberger BO, Cocucci AA, Moré M, Sérsic AN, Raguso RA (2009) Extreme variation in floral characters and its consequences for pollinator attraction among populations of an Andean cactus. Ann Bot 103:1489–1500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walter HE (2010) Floral biology of Echinopsis chiloensis ssp. chiloensis (Cactaceae): evidence for a mixed pollination syndrome. Flora 205:757–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems and why it matters. Ecology 1977:1043–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff D, Braun M, Liede S (2003) Nocturnal versus diurnal pollination success in Isertia iaevis (Rubiaceae): a sphingophilous plant visited by hummingbirds. Plant Biol 5:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc., pp 122–159

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the handling editor, Marlies Sazima, and anonymous reviewers for insightful comments that have improved this manuscript. We also thank S. Sühring for reviewing the manuscript and G. Galvani (Museo Bernardino Rivadavia) for bee identification. J. Arrueta, A. Cavalli, C. Chicharro, L. Corregidor, F. González, and N. Reyna assisted in field and laboratory work. N. Frizza assisted with the English version of the paper. The study was funded by CIUNSalta (grant nos. 1306 and 1666), FONCYT (grant no. 36822) and by a CIUNSalta scholarship to MAP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Ortega-Baes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alonso-Pedano, M., Ortega-Baes, P. Generalized and complementary pollination system in the Andean cactus Echinopsis schickendantzii . Plant Syst Evol 298, 1671–1677 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0668-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0668-7

Keywords