Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Flexible mating system in distylous populations of Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae) in Brazilian Cerrado

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In family Rubiaceae distyly is very common, and large variation in heterostyly characteristics has been previously documented. Analysis of these variations, even within a species, is very useful to our understanding of the evolutionary process that caused this polymorphism. For this reason, the goal of this study is to investigate the floral morphology and diallelic incompatibility system of three populations of Psychotria carthagenensis. The three studied populations of P. carthagenensis occur in forest fragments in protected areas in an urban matrix in the Municipality of Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil. Reciprocal position of style length and stamen height was found in populations, and in general short-styled flowers were larger than long-styled flowers. All populations presented 1:1 morph ratio between short-styled and long-styled flowers. Regarding breeding system, flowers of P. carthagenensis were self-compatible and compatible within plants of the same morph, and there was no pollen limitation in the populations in any case. In only one of the populations were there differences in the extent of compatibility between morphs, with the long-styled morph being more self-compatible than the short-styled morph. The reproductive strategy of these populations can be advantageous in case of fluctuation of pollinator activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett SCH (2002) The evolution of plant sexual diversity. Nat Rev Genet 3:274–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Cruzan MB (1994) Incompatibility in heterostylous plants. In: Williams EG, Knox RB, Clarke AE (eds) Genetic control of self-incompatibility & reproductive development. Kluwer Academic, The Netherlands, pp 189–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Harder LD (2005) The evolution of polymorphic sexual systems in daffodils (Narcissus). New Phytol 165:45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Richards JH (1990) Heterostyly in tropical plants. Mem New York Botan G 55:35–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Shore JS (1987) Variation and evolution of breeding systems in the Turnera ulmifolia complex (Turneraceae). Evolution 41:340–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa KS, Beach JH (1983) Self-incompatibility systems in the Rubiaceae of a tropical lowland wet forest. Am J Bot 70:1281–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro CC, Araujo AC (2004) Distyly and sequential pollinators of Psychotria nuda (Rubiaceae) in the Atlantic rain forest, Brazil. Plant Syst Evol 244:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro CC, Oliveira PEAM, Alves M (2004) Breeding system and floral morphometry of distylous Psychotria L. species in the Atlantic rain forest, SE Brazil. Plant Biol 6:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro S, Loureiro J, Santos C, Ater M, Ayensa G, Navarro L (2007) Distribution of flower morphs, ploidy level and sexual reproduction of invasive weed Oxalis pes-caprae in the western area of the Mediterranean region. Ann Bot 99:507–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1979) A model for the evolution of distyly. Am Nat 114:467–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiquieri A, Di Maio FR, Peixoto AL (2004) A distribuição geográfica da família Rubiaceae Juss. na Flora Brasiliensis de Martius. Rodriguésia 55:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Consolaro HN (2008) A distilía em espécies de Rubiaceae do bioma Cerrado. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de Brasília

  • Consolaro HN, Silva SS, Oliveira PE (2011) Breakdown of distyly and pin-monomorphism in Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae). Plant Species Biol 26:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delprete PG, Smith LB, Klein RM (2005) Rubiaceae. In: Reis A (ed) Flora Ilustrada Catarinense. I Parte–As Plantas/Monografia. Herbário Barbosa Rodrigues, Itajaí, pp 542–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Demetrio KM, Machado IC (2005) Biologia floral, polinização e sistema reprodutivo de Psychotria carthagenensis. Resumos do 56° Congresso Nacional de Botânica. Sociedade Botânica do Brasil, Curitiba

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulberger R (1992) Floral polymorphisms and their functional significance in the heterostylous syndrome. In: Barrett SCH (ed) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin, pp 41–84

    Google Scholar 

  • EMBRAPA-CNPGC (1985) Boletim Agrometeorológico. Campo Grande

  • Faivre AE (2000) Ontogenetic differences in heterostylous plants and implications for development from a herkogamous ancestor. Evolution 54:847–858

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faivre AE, McDade LA (2001) Population-level variation in the expression of heterostyly in three species of Rubiaceae: does reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmas characterize heterostyly? Am J Bot 88:841–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero V, Castro S, Sánchez JM, Navarro L (2011a) Stigma-anther reciprocity, pollinators, and pollen transfer efficiency in populations of heterostylous species of Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Plant Syst Evol 291:267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero V, Chapela I, Arroyo J, Navarro L (2011b) Reciprocal style polymorphisms are not so easily categorized: the case of heterostyly in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Plant Biol 13:7–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero V, Arroyo J, Castro S, Navarro L (2011c) Unusual heterostyly: style dimorphism and self-incompatibility are not tightly associated in Lithodora and Glandora (Boraginaceae). Ann Bot. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr222

  • Ganders FR (1979) The biology of heterostyly. New Zeal J Bot 17:607–635

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Robledo C, Mora F (2007) Pollination biology and the impact of floral display, pollen donors and distyly on seed production in Arcytophyllum lavarum (Rubiaceae). Plant Biol 9:453–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch AK, Silva PC, Silva CA (2010) Biologia reprodutiva de Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae), espécie distílica de fragmento florestal de mata ciliar, Centro Oeste do Brasil. Rodriguésia 61:551–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Köppen W (1948) Climatología. Editora Fondo de Cultura Econômica, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis D, Jones DA (1992) The genetics of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH (ed) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin, pp 129–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Johnston MO (2001) Comparative floral morphometrics of distyly and homostyly in three evolutionary lineages of Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Can J Bot 79:1332–1348

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1992a) The evolution of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH (ed) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin, pp 151–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1992b) The selection of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH (ed) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 179–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira ZV (2007) Rubiaceae Juss. do Parque Estadual das Várzeas do Rio Ivinhema, Mato Grosso do Sul: florística, sistema reprodutivo, distribuição espacial e relações alométricas de espécies distílicas. Tese de doutorado, Universidade Estadual de Campinas

  • Pereira ZV, Vieira MF, Carvalho-Okano RM (2006) Fenologia da floração, morfologia floral e sistema de incompatibilidade em espécies distílicas de Rubiaceae em fragmento florestal do sudeste brasileiro. Rev Bras Bot 29:471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Barrales R, Vargas P, Arroyo J (2006) New evidence for the Darwinian hypothesis of heterostyly: breeding systems and pollinators in Narcissus sect. Apodanthi. New Phytol 171:553–567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards JH, Barrett SCH (1992) The development of heterostyly. In: Barrett SCH (ed) Evolution and function of heterostyly. Springer, Berlin, pp 85–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi AAB, Olliveira LO, Vieira MF (2005) Distyly and variation in floral traits in natural populations of Psychotria ipecacuanha (Brot.) Stokes (Rubiaceae). Rev Bras Bot 28:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai S, Wright J (2008) Reproductive ecology of 21 coexisting Psychotria species (Rubiaceae): when is heterostyly lost? Biol J Linn Soc 93:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez JM, Ferrero V, Navarro L (2008) A new approach to the quantification of degree of reciprocity in distylous (sensu lato) plant populations. Ann Bot 102:463–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen DJ, Johnston MO, L’Heureux AM, Marsolais JV (1997) Evolutionary history of the mating system in Amsinckia (Boraginaceae). Evolution 51:1090–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobrevilla C, Arroyo MTK (1982) Breeding systems in a montane tropical cloud forest in Venezuela. Plant Syst Evol 140:19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rolf JF (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira LAG, Machado IC (2004) Biologia da polinização e sistema reprodutivo de Psychotria barbiflora DC. (Rubiaceae). Acta Bot Bras 18:853–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rossum F, Sousa SC, Triest L (2006) Morph-specific differences in reproductive success in the distylous Primula veris in a context of habitat fragmentation. Acta Oecol 30:426–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vuilleumier BS (1967) The origin and evolutionary development of heterostyly in the angiosperms. Evolution 21:210–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank V. Pott for identifying the plants, P. Menezes and V.A. Laura for facilitating access to the PEP and EMBRAPA reserves, respectively, and M.R. Sigrist, A.P.L. Lemke, and C.C. Castro for helpful comments. Fundação de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento do Ensino, Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (FUNDECT)/Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) provided R.R.F. with a doctoral fellowship (41/100.271/2006); CAPES provided R.R.F. with a grant in the Sandwich Doctorate Program (1964/10-0); FUNDECT provided financial support for the study (23/200.288/2008). L.N. was supported by the Spanish Dirección General de Investigación, Ciencia y Tecnología (DGICYT) through grants CGL2009-10466, the Xunta de Galicia through grant INCITE09-3103009PR, FEDER funds from the European Union and projects AECID A/023710/09, and CYTED 409AC0369, and the work of V.F. was supported by the Fundación Ramón Areces.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rogério Rodrigues Faria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faria, R.R., Ferrero, V., Navarro, L. et al. Flexible mating system in distylous populations of Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae) in Brazilian Cerrado. Plant Syst Evol 298, 619–627 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0571-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0571-7

Keywords

Navigation