Advertisement

Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 298, Issue 1, pp 93–108 | Cite as

Sequence characteristics and phylogenetic implications of the nrDNA internal transcribed spacers (ITS) in the genus Nymphaea with focus on some Indian representatives

  • Jeremy Dkhar
  • Suman KumariaEmail author
  • Satyawada Rama Rao
  • Pramod Tandon
Original Article

Abstract

Nymphaea, an aquatic perennial herb with exceptionally beautiful flowers and floating leaves, is well represented globally. Out of ten species reported from India, the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) region of nrDNA was investigated in seven species of Nymphaea viz. N. alba var. rubra, N. caerulea, N. × marliacea, N. nouchali, N. pubescens, N. rubra and N. tetragona. Barring N. pubescens, whereby double peaks detected in the sequencing chromatograms may be due to random mutations occurring in some of the ITS paralogues, the additional signals detected for N. alba var. rubra and N. rubra are probably influenced by recent hybridization and introgression. Our study on sequence characteristics of ITS 1 and ITS 2 revealed high G + C content (ITS 1, 45.5–48.4%; ITS 2, 50.2–51.5%) and sequence divergence. Percentage of sequence divergence based on substitution and substitution plus indels is 44.15 and 57.19, respectively, for the ITS 1; 29.74 and 47.96% were recorded for the ITS 2. Although highly variable, conserved motifs within the ITS 1 and ITS 2 region of Nymphaea were identified and are found to be common throughout the order Nymphaeales. Sequence analysis of the ITS 1 and ITS 2 failed to detect any variation between two morphotypes of N. nouchali, namely N. nouchali JD 06 and N. nouchali JD 07, differing in flower color and found at the same geographical location. However, on comparison with another specimen of N. nouchali found at a different location, they showed considerable variation in nucleotide composition. Complemented by sequence data retrieved from GenBank, phylogenetic tree reconstruction of the genus Nymphaea based on neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference methods is presented and discussed.

Keywords

Nymphaea ITS 1 ITS 2 Sequence divergence Phylogenetic relationship Neighbor joining Maximum parsimony Maximum likelihood Bayesian inference 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments made on an earlier version of the manuscript. The authors are grateful to Dr. S. Goel, Delhi University, for generous help and suggestions. JD is thankful to Dr. R. Gogoi, Botanical Survey of India, Shillong, for necessary help in procuring N. nouchali JD 02. This work is part of a project sanctioned to PT and SK by the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (file no. BT/PR-7055/BCE/08/437/2006). JD is thankful to the University Grants Commission for awarding him the Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship.

References

  1. Baldwin BG (1992) Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1:3–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin BG (1993) Molecular phylogenetics of Calcydenia (Compositae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: chromosomal and morphological evolution reexamined. Am J Bot 80:222–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ (1995) The ITS region of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on Angiosperm Phylogeny. Ann Miss Bot Gard 82:247–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baraket G, Saddoud O, Chatti K, Mars M, Marrakchi M, Trifi M, Salhi-Hannachi A (2009) Sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) in fig cultivars (Ficus carica L.). Sci Hortic 120:34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barta JR (1997) Investigating phylogenetic relationships within the Apicomplexa using sequence data: the search for homology. Methods 13:81–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borsch T, Hilu KW, Wilde V, Barthlott W (1998) Inferring the phylogeny of Nymphaea: evidence from the trnT-trnF region of the chloroplast genome. Am J Bot 85:116–117Google Scholar
  7. Borsch T, Hilu KW, Wiersema JH, Löhne C, Barthlott W, Wilde V (2007) Phylogeny of Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae): evidence from substitutions and microstructural changes in the chloroplast trnT-trnF region. Int J Plant Sci 168:639–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borsch T, Löhne C, Wiersema J (2008) Phylogeny and evolutionary patterns in Nymphaeales: integrating genes, genomes and morphology. Taxon 57:1052–1081Google Scholar
  9. Chauhan AS (1983) Dwindling taxa of Meghalaya. In: Jain SK, Rao RR (eds) An assessment of threatened plants of India. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, pp 142–145Google Scholar
  10. Chennaoui H, Marghali S, Marrakchi M, Trifi-Farah N (2007) Phylogenetic relationships in the North African genus Hedysarum as inferred from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conard HS (1905) The waterlilies: a monograph of the genus Nymphaea. Lord Baltimore Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  12. Dkhar J, Kumaria S, Rama Rao S, Tandon P (2010) Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic reassessment of four Indian representatives of the genus Nymphaea. Aquat Bot 93:135–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dkhar J, Kumaria S, Tandon P (2011) Nymphaea alba var. rubra is a hybrid of N. alba and N. odorata as evidenced by molecular analysis. Ann Bot Fennici 48:317–324Google Scholar
  14. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  15. eFloras (2008) Published on the Internet http://www.efloras.org. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO and Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA. Accessed 16 March 2010
  16. Felsenstein J (2004) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  17. Felsentein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Field BL, Houben A, Timmis JN, Leach CR (2006) Internal transcribed spacer sequence analyses indicate cytoevolutionary patterns within Brachycome Cass. (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol 259:39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ganeshaiah KN (2005) Recovery of endangered and threatened species. Developing a national priority list of plants and insects. Curr Sci 89:599–600Google Scholar
  20. Garcia-Mas J, Monforte AJ, Arús P (2004) Phylogenetic relationships among Cucumis species based on the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequence and microsatellite markers. Plant Syst Evol 248:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goel S, Raina SN, Ogihara Y (2002) Molecular evolution and phylogenetic implications of internal transcribed spacer sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA in the Phaseolus-Vigna complex. Mol Phylogenet Evol 22:1–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gu X (2001) Maximum-likelihood approach for gene family evolution under functional divergence. Mol Biol Evol 18:453–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hershkovitz MA, Zimmer EA (1996) Conservation patterns in angiosperm rDNA ITS2 sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 24:2857–2867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hussain I (2005) From residency to Raj Bhavan. A history of the Shillong Government House. Regency Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  25. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolution rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kollipara KP, Singh RJ, Hymowitz T (1997) Phylogenetic and genomic relationship in the genus Glycine Wild. based on sequences from the ITS region rDNA. Genome 40:57–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurzyna-Młynik R, Oskolski AA, Downie SR, Kopacz R, Wojewódzka A, Spalik K (2008) Phylogenetic position of the genus Ferula (Apiaceae) and its placement in tribe Scandiceae as inferred from nrDNA ITS sequence variation. Plant Syst Evol 274:47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kyndt T, Dung TN, Goetghebeur P, Toan HT, Gheysen G (2010) Analysis of ITS of the rDNA to infer phylogenetic relationships among Vietnamese Citrus accessions. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Latour-Marliac JB (1899) Hardy hybrid water lilies. The Garden, March 18Google Scholar
  30. Lavin M, Wojciechowski MF, Gasson P, Hughes C, Wheeler E (2003) Phylogeny of robinioid legumes (Fabaceae) revisited: Coursetia and Gliricidia recircumscribed, and a biogeographical appraisal of the Caribbean endemics. Syst Bot 28:387–409Google Scholar
  31. Lemmon AR, Brown JM, Stanger-Hall K, Lemmon EM (2009) The effect of ambiguous data on phylogenetic estimates obtained by maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference. Syst Biol 58:130–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu JS, Schardl CL (1994) A conserved sequences in internal transcribed spacer 1 of plant nuclear rRNA genes. Plant Mol Biol 26:775–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu YL, Xu LM, Ni XM, Zhao J-R (2005) Phylogeny of the Nymphaeaceae inferred from ITS sequences. Acta Phytotax Sin 43:22–30Google Scholar
  34. Löhne C, Borsch T, Wiersema JH (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of Nymphaeales using fast-evolving and noncoding chloroplast markers. Bot J Linn Soc 154:141–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Löhne C, Borsch T, Jacobs SWL, Hellquist CB, Wiersema JH (2008) Nuclear and plastid DNA sequences reveal complex reticulate patterns in Australian water-lilies (Nymphaea subgenus Anecphya, Nymphaeaceae). Aust Syst Bot 21:229–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malcomber ST (2002) Phylogeny of Gaertnera Lam. (Rubiaceae) based on multiple DNA markers: evidence of a rapid radiation in a widespread, morphologically diverse genus. Evolution 56:42–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitra RL (1990) Nymphaeaceae. In: Nayar MP, Thothathri K, Sanjappa M (eds) Fascicles of flora of India, Fascicles 20. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata, pp 11–25Google Scholar
  38. Moller M, Cronk QCB (1997) Origin and relationships of Saintpaulia (Gesneriaceae) based on ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences. Am J Bot 84:956–965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morrison DA (2006) Multiple sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes. Aust Syst Bot 19:479–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moseley MF (1961) Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaeceae II. The flower of Nymphaea. Bot Gaz 112:233–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Müller K (2005) SeqState: primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA datasets. Appl Bioinformatics 4:65–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Musters W, Boon K, van der Sande CAFM, Heerikhuizan HV, Planta RJ (1990) Functional analysis of transcribed spacers of yeast ribosomal DNA. EMBO J 9:3989–3996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Nikoloudakis N, Skaracis G, Katsiotis A (2008) Evolutionary insights inferred by molecular analysis of the ITS1–5.8S-ITS2 and IGS Avena sp. sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 46:102–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Padgett DJ, Les DH, Crow GE (1999) Phylogenetic relationships in Nuphar (Nymphaeaceae): evidence from morphology, chloroplast DNA, and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Am J Bot 86:1316–1324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Page RD (1996) TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25:1253–1256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richardson JE, Pennington RT, Pennington TD, Hollingsworth PM (2001) Rapid diversification of a species-rich genus of Neotropical rain forest trees. Science 293:2242–2245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmidt GJ, Schilling EE (2000) Phylogeny and biogeography of Eupatorium (Asteraceae: Eupatorieae) based on nuclear ITS sequence data. Am J Bot 87:716–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H (2000) Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biol 49:369–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh A, Devarumath RM, RamaRao S, Singh VP, Raina SN (2007) Assessment of genetic diversity, and phylogenetic relationships based on ribosomal DNA repeat unit length variation and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars and its wild species. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:810–825Google Scholar
  52. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Mongin FJ, Higgins DG (1997) Clustal X Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vaezi J, Brouillet L (2009) Phylogenetic relationships among diploid species of Symphyotrichum (Asteraceae: Astereae) based on two nuclear markers, ITS and GAPDH. Mol Phylogenet Evol 51:540–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van der Sande CAFM, Kwa M, van Nues RW, van Heerikhuizen H, Raué HA, Planta RJ (1992) Functional analysis of internal transcribed spacer 2 of Saccharomyces cerevisae ribosomal DNA. J Mol Biol 223:899–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Nues RW, Rientjes JMJ, van der Sande CAFM, Zerp SF, Sluiter C, Venema J, Planta RJ, Raué HA (1994) Separate structural elements within internal transcribed spacer 1 of Saccharomyces cerviasiae precursor ribosomal RNA direct the formation of 17S and 26S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res 22:912–919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Verboom GA, Linder HP, Stock WD (2003) Phylogenetics of the grass genus Ehrharta: evidence for radiation in the summer-arid zone of the South African Cape. Evolution 57:1008–1021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Verdcourt B (1989) Nymphaeaceae. In: Polhill RM (ed) Flora of tropical East Africa. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  59. Volkova PA, Shipunov AB (2008) Morphological variation of Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae) in European Russia. Nord J Bot 25:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Volkova PA, Pavel T, Christian B (2010) Evolutionary dynamics across discontinuous freshwater systems: rapid expansions and repeated allopolyploid origins in the Palearctic white water-lilies (Nymphaea). Taxon 59:483–494Google Scholar
  61. Wiersema JH (1988) Reproductive biology of Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae). Ann Missouri Bot Gard 75:795–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Woods K, Hilu KW, Borsch T, Wiersema JH (2005a) Pattern of variation and systematics of Nymphaea odorata: II. Sequence information from ITS and trnL-trnF. Syst Bot 30:481–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Woods K, Hilu KW, Borsch T, Wiersema JH (2005b) Pattern of variation and systematics of Nymphaea odorata: I. Evidence from morphology and inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs). Syst Bot 30:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Xiao L-Q, Möller M, Zhu H (2010) High nrDNA ITS polymorphism in the ancient extant seed plant Cycas: incomplete concerted evolution and the origin of pseudogenes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 55:168–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy Dkhar
    • 1
  • Suman Kumaria
    • 1
    Email author
  • Satyawada Rama Rao
    • 2
  • Pramod Tandon
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Centre for Advanced Studies in BotanyNorth-Eastern Hill UniversityShillongIndia
  2. 2.Department of Biotechnology and BioinformaticsNorth-Eastern Hill UniversityShillongIndia

Personalised recommendations