Skip to main content
Log in

Reproductive patterns within racemes in protandrous Aconitum gymnandrum (Ranunculaceae): potential mechanism and among-family variation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adaptive significance and mechanism of patterns in floral sex allocation and female success within inflorescences has attracted attention recently, whereas few studies have examined genetic variation of intra-inflorescence pattern. The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of reproduction within racemes in protandrous Aconitum gymnandrum Maxim., and illuminate potential mechanisms and genetic variation of such patterns. Data from pot experiment on 40 maternal families were collected in field. Anther number, pollen:ovule ratio and seed germination rate increased from bottom to top flowers within racemes, but other traits, such as gynoecium mass, carpel number, sepal galea height and seed production decreased significantly with flowering sequence. Variation in floral sex allocation within racemes in A. gymnandrum fitted entirely the prediction of protandry, which was not a result of architectural effect. Such selected pattern may result from a variety of factors influencing the mating environment, such as pollinator directionality, display size and flower longevity. Decline of female success within racemes in A. gymnandrum also resulted from male-biased allocation selected by variation in the mating environment, not resource competition or pollen limitation. Moreover, there was genetic variation for most reproductive traits and the position effect, as evinced by significant variation among families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashman TL (1992) Indirect costs of seed production within and between seasons in a gynodioecious species. Oecologia 92:266–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashman TL, Baker I (1992) Variation in floral sex allocation with time of season and currency. Ecology 73:1237–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashman TL, Hitchens MS (2000) Dissecting the causes of variation in intra-inflorescence allocation in sexually polymorphic species, Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae). Amer J Bot 87:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch M, Simon J, Molero J, Blanché C (2001) Breeding systems in tribe Delphinieae (Ranunculaceae) in the western Mediterranean area. Flora 196:101–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunet J (1996) Male reproductive success and variation in fruit and seed set in Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Ecology 77:2458–2471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet J, Charlesworth D (1995) Floral sex allocation in sequentially blooming plants. Evolution 49:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buide ML (2004) Intra-inflorescence variation in floral traits and reproductive success of the hermaphrodite Silene acutifolia. Ann Bot 94:441–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin CR (1877) The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilized by insects, 2nd edn. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PK (1993) Developmental plasticity, genetic variation, and the evolution of andromonoecy in Solanum hirtum (Solanaceae). Amer J Bot 80:967–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PK (1995) Architectural effects and the interpretation of patterns of fruit and seed development. Annual Rev Ecol Syst 26:531–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PK (1997) Ontogenic contingency and floral morphology: the effects of architecture and resource limitation. Int J Pl Sci 158:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guitián J, Navarro L (1996) Allocation of reproductive resources within the inflorescences of Petrocoptis grandiflora (Caryophyllaceae). Canad J Bot 74:1482–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guitián J, Medrano M, Oti J (2004) Variation in floral sex allocation in Polygonatum odoratum (Liliaceae). Ann Bot 94:433–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guitián P (2006) Phenotypic gender variation within inflorescences of the protogynous species Helleborus foetidus L. (Ranunculaceae). Pl Syst Evol 258:137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera J (1991) Allocation of reproductive resources within and among inflorescences of Lavandula stoechas (Lamiaceae). Amer J Bot 78:789–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiraga T, Sakai S (2007) The effects of inflorescence size and flower position on biomass and temporal sex allocation in Lobelia sessiliflora. Pl Ecol 188:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang SQ, Tang LL, Yu Q, Guo YH (2004) Temporal floral sex allocation in protogynous Aquilegia yabeana contrasts with protandrous species: support for the mating environment hypothesis. Evolution 58:1131–1134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii HS, Sakai S (2002) Temporal variation in floral display size and individual floral sex allocation in racemes of Narthecium asiaticum (Liliaceae). Amer J Bot 89:441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itagaki T, Sakai S (2006) Relationship between floral longevity and sex allocation among flowers within inflorescences in Aquilegia buergeriana var. oxysepala (Ranunculaceae). Amer J Bot 93:1320–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliber A, Eckert CG (2004) Sequential decline in allocation among flowers within inflorescences: proximate mechanisms and adaptive significance. Ecology 85:1675–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo G, Maeda T, Narita K (2001) Variation in floral sex allocation and reproductive success within inflorescences of Corydalis ambigua (Fumariaceae): pollination efficiency or resource limitation? J Ecol 89:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD (1988) Patterns of fruit and seed production. In: Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (eds) Plant reproductive ecology: patterns and strategies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 179–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazer SJ, Dawson KA (2001) Size-dependent sex allocation within flowers of the annual herb Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae): ontogenetic and among-plant variation. Amer J Bot 88:819–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer SJ, Delesalle VA (1996) Floral trait variation in Spergularia marina (Caryophyllaceae): ontogenetic, maternal family, and population effects. Heredity 77:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medrano M, Guitián P, Guitián J (2000) Patterns of fruit and seed set within inflorescences of Pancratium maritimum (Amaryllidaceae): nonuniform pollination, resource limitation, or architectural effects? Amer J Bot 87:493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellmyr O (1987) Multiple sex expression in Cimicifuga simplex: dichogamy destabilizes hermaphroditism. Biol J Linn Soci 31:161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML, Galloway LF (1990) Natural selection and allocation to reproduction in flowering plants. In: Mangel M (ed) Some mathematical questions in biology. Sex allocation and sex change: experiments and models. American Mathematical Association, Rhode Island, pp 1–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallius E (2000) Position-dependent reproductive success of flowers in Dactylorhiza maculata (Orchidaceae). Funct Ecol 14:573–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler DW, Peretz S, Stephenson AG (1999) Floral plasticity in an iteroparous plant: the interactive effects of genotype, environment, and ontogeny in Campanula rapunculoides (Campanulaceae). Amer J Bot 86:482–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesselingh RA, Arnold ML (2003) A top-down hierarchy in fruit set on inflorescences in Iris fulva (Iridaceae). Pl Biol 5:651–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JL, Conner JK (2001) Sources of phenotypic variation in floral traits in wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum (Brassicaceae). Amer J Bot 88:1577–1581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe LM (1992) Why does the size of reproductive structures decline through time in Hydrophyllum appendiculatum (Hydrophyllaceae): developmental constraints vs. resource limitation? Amer J Bot 79:1286–1290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang TF, Duan YW, Liu JQ (2006) Pollination ecology of Aconitum gymnandrum (Ranunculaceae) at two sites with different altitudes. Acta Phytotax Sin 44:362–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZG, Du GZ (2003) Mating system characters and the strategies of resource allocation in Ranunculaceae. J Lanzhou University (Natural Sci) 39:70–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Y.-L. He, M-T Wang and X.-H. Zhou for helps in the field and lab. We thank Dr. R.A. Wesselingh for the valuable comments. We are very grateful to Dr. D. Maddox for the significant discussions and modifications. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. This project was funded by a State key project for natural science foundation (90202009) to G.-Z. Du.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-Zhen Du.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, ZG., Meng, JL., Fan, BL. et al. Reproductive patterns within racemes in protandrous Aconitum gymnandrum (Ranunculaceae): potential mechanism and among-family variation. Plant Syst Evol 273, 247–256 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-008-0002-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-008-0002-6

Keywords

Navigation