Skip to main content
Log in

Phylogenetic relationships in tribe Spiraeeae (Rosaceae) inferred from nucleotide sequence data

  • Published:
Plant Systematics and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tribe Spiraeeae has generally been defined to include Aruncus, Kelseya, Luetkea, Pentactina, Petrophyton, Sibiraea, and Spiraea. Recent phylogenetic analyses have supported inclusion of Holodiscus in this group. Spiraea, with 50-80 species distributed throughout the north temperate regions of the world, is by far the largest and most widespread genus in the tribe; the remaining genera have one to several species each. Phylogenetic analyses of nuclear ITS and chloroplast trnL-trnF nucleotide sequences for 33 species representing seven of the aforementioned genera plus Xerospiraea divided the tribe into two well supported clades, one including Aruncus, Luetkea, Holodiscus, and Xerospiraea, the second including the other genera. Within Spiraea, none of the three sections recognized by Rehder based on inflorescence morphology is supported as monophyletic. Our analyses suggest a western North American origin for the tribe, with several biogeographic events involving vicariance or dispersal between the Old and New Worlds having occurred within this group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bharathan G., Goliber T. E., Moore C., Kessler S., Pham T. and Sinha N. R. (2002). Homologies in leaf form inferred from KNOXI gene expression during development. Science 296: 1858–1860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bortiri E., Oh S., Jiang J., Baggett S., Granger A., Weeks C., Buckingham M., Potter D. and Parfitt D. (2001). Phylogeny and systematics of Prunus (Rosaceae) as determined by sequence analysis of ITS and the chloroplast trnL-trnF spacer DNA. Syst. Bot. 26: 797–807

    Google Scholar 

  • de Candolle A. P. (1825) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, sive, Enumeratio contracta ordinum generum specierumque plantarum huc usque cognitarium, juxta methodi naturalis, normas digesta. 2: 541. Treuttel et Würtz, Paris.

  • Doyle J. J. and Doyle J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans R. C. and Dickinson T. A. (1999). Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Spiraeoideae Endl. (Rosaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160: 981–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrickson J. (1985). Xerospiraea, a generic segregate of Spiraea (Rosaceae) from Mexico. Aliso 11: 199–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker W. J. (1834). Flora Boreali-Americana. I. H. G. Bohn, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Huelsenbeck J. P. and Ronquist F. (2001). MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson J. (1964). The genera of flowering plants, vol. 1, Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim M., Pham T., Hamidi A., McCormick S., Kuzoff R. K. and Sinha N. (2003). Reduced leaf complexity in tomato wiry mutants suggests a role for PHAN and KNOX genes in generating compound leaves. Development 130: 4405–4415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuntze O. (1891). Revisio Generum Plantarum 1: 1–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingdi L. and Alexander C. (2003). Spiraea. In: Zhengyi, W., Raven, P. H. and Deyuan, H. (eds) Flora of China, vol. 9, pp 47–73. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus C. (1753) Species Plantarum I, 1st ed. Stockholm.

  • Maddison W. P. and Maddison D. R. (1999). MacClade, version 3.08. Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Masamune G. (1932). Genera plantarum formosamarum. Annual Rep. Taihoku Bot. Gard. 2: 123

    Google Scholar 

  • Maximowicz C. J. (1879). Adnotationes de spiraeaces. Trudy Imp. S.-Peterburgsk. Bot. Sada 6: 105–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D. R., Soltis D. E. and Robertson K. R. (1994). Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 890–903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nylander J. A. A. (2005) MrAIC, version 1.4., available at http://www.abc.se/~nylander/.

  • Potter D., Eriksson T., Evans R. C., Oh S., Smedmark J., Morgan D. R., Kerr M., Robertson K. R., Arsenault M. and Campbell C. S. (2007). Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 5–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter D., Gao F., Bortiri P. E., Oh S. and Baggett S. (2002). Phylogenetic relationships in Rosaceae inferred from chloroplast matK and trnL-trnF nucleotide sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 231: 77–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poyarkova A. I. (1939). Spiraeoideae. In: Borisova, A. G., Komarov, V. L., Krishtofovich, A. N., Lozina-Lozinskaya, A. S., Maleev, V. P., Palibin, I. V., Poyarkova, A. I., Tsinzerling, Yu. D. and Yuzepchuk, S. V. (eds) Flora of the U.S.S.R, pp 216–245. Izdatel-stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder A. (1940). Manual of cultivated trees and shrubs. Dioscorides Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydberg P. A. (1900). Catalogue of the flora of Montana. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 1: 1–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze-Menz G. K. (1964). Rosaceae. In: Melchior, H. (eds) Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien II, pp 209–218. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford D. L. (2002). PAUP* Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods) Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Taberlet P., Gielly L., Pautou G. and Bouvet J. (1991). Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17(5): 1105–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan A. (1997). Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F. and Higgins D. G. (1997). The CLUSTALX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucl. Acids Res. 25: 4876–4882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson S. (1890a). Contributions to American botany. IX. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts 25: 124–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson S. (1890b). On the genus Eriogynia Bot. Gaz. 15: 241–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White T. J., Bruns T., Lee S. and Taylor J. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J., and White, T. J. (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, pp 315–322. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Potter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potter, D., Still, S., Grebenc, T. et al. Phylogenetic relationships in tribe Spiraeeae (Rosaceae) inferred from nucleotide sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 266, 105–118 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0544-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0544-z

Keywords

Navigation