Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A critical evaluation of reproductive barriers between closely related species using DNA markers - a case study in Pinus

  • 110 Accesses

  • 20 Citations

Abstract

Former controlled crosses between twelve Pinus montana var. rostrata (Pinus mugo complex) and eight P. sylvestris clones revealed that only two P. sylvestris had efficiently fertilised P. montana. Two species-diagnostic chloroplast DNA markers were applied to verify the species purity of the parental clones. All maternal P. montana were unambiguously confirmed to belong to the P. mugo complex at both chloroplast DNA marker loci. Six P. sylvestris clones carried the `sylvestris' haplotypes. However, the same two P. sylvestris clones that had efficiently fertilised P. montana displayed the chloroplast haplotypes diagnostic to the P. mugo complex. The patterns of highly polymorphic cpDNA microsatellite markers in parents and offspring ruled out contamination by foreign pollen. We concluded that the two clones successful in the crosses represent fertile hybrids between the two species with P. mugo as the pollen donor. Consequently, DNA markers are proposed for verifying or falsifying the success of artificial fertilisation in general. The existence of crossing barriers between the two Pinus species, meaningful to the postulated natural hybridisation and the evolution of their populations in sympatric stands, was indicated and is newly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. M.L. Arnold (1997) Natural hybridization and evolution Oxford University Press Oxford

  2. M.A. Bobowicz (1990) Hybrids of Pinus mugo Turra x Pinus sylvestris L. from the Bór na Czerwonem peatbog in Nowy Targ Valley. Wyd. Nauk UAM Poznań

  3. M.A. Bobowicz B.R. Stephan W. Prus–Głowacki (2000) ArticleTitleGenetic variation of F1 hybrids from controlled crosses between Pinus montana var. rostrata and Pinus sylvestris in anatomical needle traits Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 69 207–214

  4. M.A. Bobowicz B.R. Stephan W. Prus–Głowacki (2001) ArticleTitleGenetic variation of F1 hybrids from controlled crosses between Pinus montana var. rostrata and Pinus sylvestris in morphological needle traits J. Appl. Genet. 42 449–466 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7is1ahtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle14564021

  5. G. Bucci M. Anzidei A. Madaghiele G.G. Vendramin (1998) ArticleTitleDetection of haplotypic variation and natural hybridisation in halepensis-complex pine species using chloroplast simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers Molec. Ecol. 7 1633–1643 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjtVOhtA%3D%3D

  6. K. Christiansen G.H. Dar (1997) ArticleTitleA morphometric analysis of spontaneous and artificial hybrids of Pinus mugo x P. sylvestris (Pinaceae) Nord.J. Bot. 17 77–86

  7. A. Dengler (1932) ArticleTitleKünstliche Bestäubungsversuche an Kiefern Zeitschr. f. Forst- und Jagdwesen 64 513–555

  8. A. Dengler (1939) ArticleTitleÜber die Entwicklung künstlicher Kiefernkreuzungen Zeitschr. f. Forst- und Jagdwesen 71 457–485

  9. A. Dengler (1942) ArticleTitleHerkunfts- und Kreuzungsversuche im Versuchsgarten des Waldbauinstituts Eberswalde Mitt Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges. 55 157–169

  10. D. Nettancourt ParticleDe (1997) ArticleTitleIncompatibility in angiosperms Sex. Plant Rep. 10 185–199

  11. S. Dumolin B. Demesure R.J. Petit (1995) ArticleTitleInheritance of chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes in pedunculate oak investigated with an efficient PCR method Theor. Appl. Genet. 91 1253–1256 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00220937 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XhsFKmsLo%3D

  12. M.A. Edwards-Burke J.L. Hamrick R.A. Price (1997) ArticleTitleFrequency and direction of hybridisation in sympatric populations of Pinus taeda and P. echinata (Pinaceae) Amer. J. Bot. 84 IssueID7 879–886 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXlsVKksr4%3D

  13. S. Filppula A.E. Szmidt O. Savolainen (1992) ArticleTitleGenetic comparison between Pinus sylvestris and P. mugo using isozymes and chloroplast DNA Nord. J. Bot. 12 381–386 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXpvVWqsQ%3D%3D

  14. M. Gaget C. Said C. Dumas R.B. Knox (1984) ArticleTitlePollen-pistil interactions in interspecific crosses of Populus (Sections Aigeiros and Leuce): Pollen adhesion, hydration and callose responses J. Cell. Sci. 72 173–184 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2M7ot1yrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle6533149

  15. J. Germano A.S. Klein (1999) ArticleTitleSpecies–specific nuclear and chloroplast single nucleotide polymorphisms to distinguish Picea glauca, P. mariana and P. rubens Theor. Appl. Genet. 99 37–49 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001220051206 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXlvFGlt7o%3D

  16. V.D. Hipkins K.V. Krutovskii S.H. Strauss (1994) ArticleTitleOrganelle genomes in conifers: structure, evolution, and diversity Forest Genet. 4 179–189

  17. A. Kormutak M. Lanakowa (1988) ArticleTitleBiochemistry of reproductive organs and hybridological relationships of selected pine species (Pinus sp.) Acta Dendrob. 1 7–103

  18. A. Kormuták B. Vookova B. Ziegenhagen (2002) ArticleTitleReproductive isolation between Colorado white fir (Abies concolor) and the Mediterranean firs Biologia, Bratislava 57 527–532

  19. J. Lauranson-Broyer P. Lebreton (1993) ArticleTitleFlavonoids and morphological traits of needles, as markers of natural hybridisation between Pinus uncinata Ram. and Pinus sylvestris L Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 21 241–247 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK3sXisFWnu7s%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/0305-1978(93)90041-O

  20. E. Marcet (1967) ArticleTitleÜber den Nachweis spontaner Hybriden von Pinus mugo Turra und Pinus sylvestris auf Grund von Nadelmerkmalen Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 77 314–361

  21. P. Marchelli L. Gallo F. Scholz B. Ziegenhagen (1998) ArticleTitleChloroplast DNA markers revealed a geographical divide across Argentinean southern beech Nothofagus nervosa (Phil.) Dim. et Mil. distribution area Theor. Appl. Genet 97 642–646 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s001220050940 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXntFOgt74%3D

  22. G.H. Melchior F.W. Seitz (1968) ArticleTitleInterspezifische Kreuzungssterilität innerhalb der Pappelsektion Aigeiros Silvae Genet. 17 88–93

  23. D.B. Neale R.R. Sederoff (1988) ArticleTitlePaternal inheritance of chloroplast and maternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in loblolly pine Theor. Appl. Genet. 77 212–216

  24. C. Neet-Sarqueda (1994) ArticleTitleGenetic differentiation of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus mugo aggr. populations in Switzerland Silvae Genet. 43 207–215

  25. R.J. Petit C. Bodénès A. Ducousso G. Roussel A. Kremer (2003) ArticleTitleHybridization as a mechanism of invasion in oaks New Phytologist 161 151–164 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00944.x Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmsVWltw%3D%3D

  26. W. Prus-Głowacki J. Szweykowski J. Sadowski (1978) ArticleTitleStudies on serological similarity of Pinus sylvestris L., P. mugo Turra and individuals from a hybrid swarm population Genet. Polon. 19 321–338

  27. W. Prus-Głowacki J. Szweykowski (1983) ArticleTitleStudies on isoenzyme variability in populations of Pinus sylvestris L., Pinus mugo Turra, Pinus uliginosa Neumann and individuals from a hybrid swarm population Bull. Sci. Amis. Poznań 22 107–122

  28. W. Prus-Głowacki B.R. Stephan (1998) ArticleTitleImmunochemical and isoenzymatic characterization of hybrids from controlled crosses between Pinus montana var. rostrata and Pinus sylvestris Forest Genet. 5 155–163

  29. B.H. Song X.Q. Wang X.R. Wang K.Y. Ding D.Y. Hong (2003) ArticleTitleCytoplasmic composition in Pinus densata and population establishment of the diploid hybrid pine Molec. Ecol. 12 2995–3001

  30. J. Staszkiewicz M. Tyszkiewicz (1969) ArticleTitleNatural hybrids of Pinus mugo Turra x Pinus silvestris L. in Kotlina Nowotarska (in Polish) Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 15 187–212

  31. R. Streiff T. Labbe R. Bacilieri H. Steinkellner J. Glössl A. Kremer (1998) ArticleTitleWithin- population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites Molec. Ecol. 7 317–328

  32. A.E. Szmidt X.R. Wang (1991) DNA markers in forest genetics G. Müller-Starck M. Ziehe (Eds) Genetic variation in European populations of forest trees Sauerländer's Verlag Frankfurt am Main 79–94

  33. P. Taberlet L. Gielly G. Pauton J. Bouvet (1991) ArticleTitleUniversal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA Pl. Molec. Biol. 17 1105–1109 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK38Xhslel

  34. G.G. Vendramin L. Lelli P. Rossi M. Morgante (1996) ArticleTitleA set of primers for the amplification of 20 chloroplast microsatellites in Pinaceae Molec. Ecol. 5 111–114

  35. J. Viewegh H. Cambalowa (1993) ArticleTitleVariableness of hybrid swarm Pinus celekovskiorum A. et Gr. processed with some cluster analyses methods Biol. Bratislava 48 39–44

  36. W. Wachowiak K. Leśniewicz I. Odrzykoski H. Augustyniak W. Prus-Głowacki (2000) ArticleTitleSpecies specific cpDNA markers useful for studies on the hybridisation between Pinus mugo and P. sylvestris Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 69 273–276 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXmsFGntL8%3D

  37. W. Wachowiak A. Lewandowski W. Prus-Głowacki (2005) ArticleTitleReciprocal controlled crosses between Pinus sylvestris and P. mugo verified by a species-specific cpDNA marker J. Appl. Genet. 46 IssueID1 41–43 Occurrence Handle15741663

  38. D.B. Wagner G.R. Furnier M.A. Saghai-Maroof S.M. Wiliams P.B. Dancik R.W. Allard (1987) ArticleTitleChloroplast DNA polymorphism in lodgepole and jack pines and their hybrids Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84 2097–2100 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL2sXhvFaqtLY%3D Occurrence Handle3470779

  39. D.B. Wagner (1992) ArticleTitleNuclear, chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism as biochemical markers in population genetic analyses of forest trees New Forests 6 373–390 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00120653

  40. Y. Watano M. Imazu T. Shimizu (1995) ArticleTitleChloroplast DNA typing by PCR-SSCP in the Pinus pumilaP. parviflora var. pentaphylla complex (Pinaceae) J. Plant. Res. 108 493–499 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK28XhtVagtrc%3D

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to W. Wachowiak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wachowiak, W., Stephan, B.R., Schulze, I. et al. A critical evaluation of reproductive barriers between closely related species using DNA markers - a case study in Pinus . Plant Syst. Evol. 257, 1–8 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-005-0363-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pinus mugo
  • Pinus sylvestris
  • Scots pine
  • artificial hybridisation
  • chloroplast microsatellites
  • trnL-trnF
  • PCR-RFLP
  • reproductive barrier