Microchimica Acta

, 185:315 | Cite as

Electrochemical determination of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol using a hybrid film composed of a copper-based metal organic framework and electroreduced graphene oxide

  • Yong Wang
  • Wei Cao
  • Luyao Wang
  • Qianfen Zhuang
  • Yongnian Ni
Original Paper
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

A metal organic framework (MOF) of the type copper(II)-1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (Cu-BTC) was electrodeposited on electroreduced graphene oxide (ERGO) placed on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The modified GCE was used for highly sensitive electrochemical determination of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP). The fabrication process of the modified electrode was characterized by scanning electron microscopy and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) demonstrates that the Cu-BTC/ERGO/GCE gives stronger signals for TNP reduction than Cu-BTC/GCE or ERGO/GCE alone. DPV also shows TNP to exhibit three reduction peaks, the first at a potential of −0.42 V (vs. SCE). This potential was selected because the other three similarly-structured compounds (2-nitrophenol, 4-nitrophenol, 2,4-dinitrophenol) do not give a signal at this potential. Response is linear in the 0.2 to 10 μM TNP concentration range, with a 0.1 μM detection limit (at S/N = 3) and a 15.98 μA∙μM−1∙cm−2 sensitivity under optimal conditions. The applicability of the sensor was evaluated by detecting TNP in spiked tap water and lake water samples. Recoveries ranged between 95 and 101%.

Graphical abstract

Schematic presentation of an electrochemical sensor that was fabricated by electrodeposition of the metal-organic framework (MOF) of copper(II)-1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (Cu-BTC) onto the surface of electroreduced graphene oxide (ERGO) modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE). It was applied to sensitive and selective detection of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP).

Keywords

Coordination polymers Nitroaromatic compounds Picric acid Nanocomposites Electrodeposition Electrocatalysis Differential pulse voltammetry 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol Environmental analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC−21305061), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20171BAB203018 and 20151BAB203021), the Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (GJJ160006 and GJJ160204), the Open Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry (SKLEAC-201802), the State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics of Hunan University (SKLCBC−2013010), and the Graduate Student Innovation Program of Nanchang University (CX2017040).

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

604_2018_2857_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.8 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1798 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Akhavan J (2004) Chemistry of explosive, second ed. Royal Society of Chemistry, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Copper P (1996) Explosive engeneering. Wiley VCH, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rong MC, Lin LP, Song XH, Zhao TT, Zhong YX, Yan JW, Wang YR, Chen X (2015) A label-free fluorescence sensing approach for selective and sensitive detection of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (TNP) in aqueous solution using graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets. Anal Chem 87:1288–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agrawal JP (2010) High energy materials: propellants explosives and pyrotechnics. Wiley VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hakonen A, Wang FC, Andersson PO, Wingfors H, Rindzevicius T, Schmidt MS, Soma VR, Xu SC, Li YQ, Boisen A, Wu HA (2017) Hand-held femtogram detection of hazardous picric acid with hydrophobic Ag nanopillar SERS substrates and mechanism of elasto-capillarity. ACS Sensors 2:198–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cameron M (1995) Picric acid hazards. American industrial hygiene association, FairfaxGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang Y, Ni YN (2014) Molybdenum disulfide quantum dots as a photoluminescence sensing platform for 2,4,6-trinitrophenol detection. Anal Chem 86:7463–7470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cascio O, Trettene M, Bortolotti F, Milana G, Tagliaro F (2004) Analysis of organic components of smokeless gunpowders: high-performance liquidchromatogaphy vs. micellar electrokinetic capillarychromatography. Electrophoresis 25:1543–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ivanova OM, Raks VA, Zaitsev VN (2014) Highly-effective liquid chromatographic determination of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol in surface waters after its selective solid phase extraction. J Water Chem Technol 36:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burdel M, Sandrejova J, Balogh IS, Vishnikin A, Andruch V (2013) A comparison of various modes of liquid-liquid based microextraction techniques: determination of picric acid. J Sep Sci 36:932–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parham H, Zargar B, Rezazadeh M (2012) Removal, preconcentration and spectrophotometric determination of picric acid in water samples using modified magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as an efficient adsorbent. Mater Sci Eng C 32:2109–2114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giribabu K, Oh SY, Suresh R, Kumar SP, Manigandan R, Munusamy S, Gnanamoorthy G, Kim JY, Huh YS, Narayanan V (2016) Sensing of picric acid with a glassy carbon electrode modified with CuS nanoparticles deposited on nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide. Microchim Acta 183:2421–2430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tall OE, Beh D, Jaffrezic-Renault N, Vittori O (2010) Electroanalysis of some nitro-compounds using bulk bismuth electrode. Int J Environ Anal Chem 90:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Prchal V, Vyskocil V, Barek J (2010) Voltammetric determination of environmental pollutant 2,4,6-Trinitrophenol using a bismuth bulk electrode. J Electrochem Soc 164:H316–H320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacobsen M, Duwensee H, Wachholz F, Adamovski M, Flechsig GU (2010) Determination of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol by differential pulse voltammetry at a bismuth bulk working electrode. Electroanalysis 22:1483–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vyskocil V, Navratil T, Danhel A, Dedik J, Krejcova Z, Skvorova L, Tvrdikova J, Barek J (2011) Voltammetric determination of selected nitro compounds at a polished silver solid amalgam composite electrode. Electroanalysis 23:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Junqueira JR, Araujo WR, Salles MO, Paixao TR (2013) Flow injection analysis of picric acid explosive using a copper electrode as electrochemical detector. Talanta 104:162–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang JR, Wang LY, Shi CC, Dai YJ, Gu CP, Liu JH (2014) Selective detection of picric acid using functionalized reduced graphene oxide sensor device. Sensors Actuators B Chem 196:567–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mahyari M (2016) Electrochemical determination of picric acid based on platinum nanoparticles-reduced graphene oxide composite. Int J Environ Anal Chem 96:1455–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhu L, Liu XQ, Jiang HL, Sun LB (2017) Metal-organic frameworks for heterogeneous basic catalysis. Chem Rev 117:8094–8128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    James SL (2003) Metal organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev 32:276–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Odoh SO, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG, Gagliardi L (2015) Quantum-chemical characterization of the properties and reactivities of metal-organic frameworks. Chem Rev 115:6051–6111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yuan BQ, Zhang RC, Jiao XX, Li J, Shi HZ, Zhang DJ (2014) Amperometric determination of reduced glutathione with a new co-based metal-organic coordination polymer modified electrode. Electrochem Commun 40:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang DJ, Zhang JC, Zhang RC, Shi HZ, Guo YY, Guo XL, Li SJ, Yuan BQ (2015) 3D porous metal-organic framework as an efficient electrocatalyst for nonenzymatic sensing application. Talanta 144:1176–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Deep A, Bhardwaj SK, Paul A, Kim KH, Kumar P (2015) Surface assembly of nanometal organic framework on amine functionalized indium tin oxide substrate for impedimetric sensing of parathion. Biosens Bioelectron 65:226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kung CW, Chang TH, Chou LY, Hupp JT, Farha OK, Ho KC (2015) Porphyrin-based metal-organic framework thin films for electrochemical nitrite detection. Electrochem Commun 58:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ji LD, Cheng Q, Wu KB, Yang XF (2016) Cu-BTC frameworks-based electrochemical sensing platform for rapid and simple determination of sunset yellow and tartrazine. Sensors Actuators B Chem 231:12–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roushani M, Valipour A, Saedi Z (2016) Electroanalytical sensing of Cd2+ based on metal-organic framework modified carbon paste electrode. Sensors Actuators B Chem 233:419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang YF, Bo XJ, Luhana C, Wang H, Li M, Guo LP (2013) Facile synthesis of a Cu-based MOF confined in macroporous carbon hybrid material with enhanced electrocatalytic ability. Chem Commun 49:6885–6887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM, Sinitskii A, Sun ZZ, Slesarev A, Alemany LB, Lu W, Tour JM (2010) Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4:4806–4814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang Y, Zhaung QF, Ni YN (2015) Fabrication of riboflavin electrochemical sensor based on homoadenine single-stranded DNA/molybdenum disulfide-graphene nanocomposite modified gold electrode. J Electroanal Chem 736:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang YF, Nsabimana A, Zhu LD, Bo XJ, Han C, Li M, Guo LP (2014) Metal organic frameworks/macroporous carbon composites with enhanced stability properties and good electrocatalytic ability for ascorbic acid and hemoglobin. Talanta 129:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mutyala S, Mathiyarasu J (2016) A reagentless non-enzymatic hydrogen peroxide sensor presented using electrochemically reduced graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode. Mater Sci Eng C 69:398–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhou J, Li X, Yang LL, Yan SL, Wang MM, Cheng D, Chen Q, Dong YL, Liu P, Cai WQ, Zhang CC (2015) The Cu-MOF-199/single-walled carbon nanotubes modified electrode for simultaneous determination of hydroquinone and catechol with extended linear ranges and lower detection limits. Anal Chim Acta 899:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang Y, Cao W, Zhaung QF, Ni YN (2018) Electrochemical determination of hydrogen peroxide using a glassy carbon electrode modified with three-dimensional copper hydroxide nanosupercages and electrochemically reduced graphene oxide. Anal Lett in press:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2018.1428986
  36. 36.
    Niu XL, Chen W, Wang XL, Men YL, Wang Q, Sun W, Li GJ (2018) A graphene modified carbon ionic liquid electrode for voltammetric analysis of the sequence of the Staphylococcus aureus nuc gene. Microchim Acta 185:167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dong SY, Suo GC, Li N, Chen Z, Peng L, Fu YL, Yang Q, Huang TL (2016) A simple strategy to fabricate high sensitive 2,4-dichlorophenol electrochemical sensor based on metal organic framework Cu3(BTC)2. Sensors Actuators B Chem 222:972–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang QX, Yang YZ, Gao F, Ni JC, Zhang YH, Lin ZY (2016) Graphene oxide directed one-step synthesis of flowerlike graphene@HKUST-1 for enzyme-free detection of hydrogen peroxide in biological samples. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:32477–32487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Biemmi E, Darga A, Stock N, Bein T (2008) Direct growth of Cu3(BTC)2(H2O)3 · xH2O thin films on modified QCM-gold electrodes -water sorption isotherms. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 114:380–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yang J, Zhao FQ, Zeng BZ (2015) One-step synthesis of a copper-based metal-organic framework-graphene nanocomposite with enhanced electrocatalytic activity. RSC Adv 5:22060–22065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Song HY, Ma CH, You LY, Cheng ZY, Zhang XH, Yin BS, Ni YN, Zhang KQ (2015) Electrochemical hydrogen peroxide sensor based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with nanosheets of copper-doped copper(II) oxide. Microchim Acta 182:1543–1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Arvinte A, Mahosenaho M, Pinteala M, Sesay A-M, Virtanen V (2011) Electrochemical oxidation of p-nitrophenol using graphene-modified electrodes, and a comparison to the performance of MWNT-based electrodes. Microchim Acta 174:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yin H, Zhou Y, Ai S, Liu X, Zhu L, Lu L (2010) Electrochemical oxidative determination of 4-nitrophenol based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with a hydroxyapatite nanopowder. Microchim Acta 169(1–2):87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ahmed GHG, Laíño RB, Calzón JAG, García MED (2015) Highly fluorescent carbon dots as nanoprobes for sensitive and selective determination of 4-nitrophenol in surface waters. Microchim Acta 182:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ChemistryNanchang UniversityNanchangChina

Personalised recommendations