Microchimica Acta

, 185:221 | Cite as

Gold nanorods for in-drop colorimetric determination of thiomersal after photochemical decomposition

  • Manuel Martín-Alonso
  • Francisco Pena-Pereira
  • Isela Lavilla
  • Carlos Bendicho
Original Paper
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

This work reports on the implementation of gold nanorods (AuNRs) in headspace solvent microextraction for colorimetric determination of volatile analyte derivatives in a single drop. The exposure of AuNRs to both H2Se and elemental mercury (Hg0) results in a shift of the longitudinal plasmonic band, unlike a number of volatiles. Accordingly, a method is reported for the determination of Hg0 with potential applicability to the determination of thiomersal (sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate). It is based on the photochemical decomposition of thiomersal into Hg(II) and subsequent exposure of AuNRs-containing microdrop to in situ generated Hg0. Colorimetric analysis of the enriched drop was carried out without dilution by means of a cuvetteless microvolume UV-vis spectrometer. Under optimal conditions, the limit of detection was 0.5 ng mL−1 (as Hg). The repeatability, expressed as relative standard deviation, was 8.4% (for n = 10). AuNRs exposed to increasing concentrations of the analyte were characterized by means of transmission electron microscopy and UV-vis spectrophotometry to ascertain the mechanism of detection. The method was finally applied to the determination of thiomersal in various pharmaceutical samples and showed quantitative recoveries.

Graphical abstract

Schematic illustration of a miniaturized colorimetric method based on the use of a microdrop of gold nanorods (AuNRs) for thiomersal determination in pharmaceuticals. It is based on the photochemical decomposition of thiomersal and subsequent Hg0 generation with in-drop amalgamation.

Keywords

Central composite design Mercury Microextraction Microvolume spectrometry Miniaturization Nanoparticles Pharmaceuticals Plackett-Burman design Sample preparation Thiomersal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project CTQ2015-68146-P) (MINECO/FEDER) is gratefully acknowledged. F. Pena-Pereira thanks Xunta de Galicia for financial support as a post-doctoral researcher of the I2C program. The CACTI facilities (University of Vigo) are also acknowledged for obtaining TEM and SEM images and performing EDS analyses.

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

604_2018_2760_MOESM1_ESM.docx (550 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 549 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Campanella B, Onor M, Mascherpa MC, D’Ulivo A, Ferrari C, Bramanti E (2013) Determination of thiomersal by flow injection coupled with microwave-assisted photochemical online oxidative decomposition of organic mercury and cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectroscopy. Anal Chim Acta 804:66–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, 6th ed. APhA Pharmaceutical Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    FDA (2018) Thiomersal and vaccines. https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/UCM096228. Accessed 27 Feb 2018
  4. 4.
    Gil S, Lavilla I, Bendicho C (2007) Greener analytical method for determination of thiomersal (sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate) in ophthalmic solutions using sono-induced cold vapour generation-atomic absorption spectrometry after UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation. J Anal At Spectrom 22:569–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jos E, Herrmann B, Baika M et al (2010) Determination of thimerosal in human and veterinarian vaccines by photochemical vapor generation coupled to ICP OES. J Anal At Spectrom 25:1627–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fredj A, Okbi H, Adhoum N, Monser L (2012) Gas diffusion flow injection determination of thiomersal in vaccines. Talanta 91:47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Procopio JR, da Silva MP, Asensio MC et al (1992) HPLC analysis of thiomersal and its degradation products in ophthalmic solutions with electrochemical detection. Talanta 39:1619–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Acosta G, Spisso A, Fernández LP, Martinez LD, Pacheco PH, Gil RA (2015) Determination of thimerosal in pharmaceutical industry effluents andriver waters by HPLC coupled to atomic fluorescence spectrometrythrough post-column UV-assisted vapor generation. J Pharm Biomed Anal 106:79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Acosta G, Torres S, Kaplan M, Fernández LP, Pacheco PH, Gil RA (2016) Liquid chromatography coupled to molecular fluorescence with postcolumn UV sensitization for thimerosal and derivative compounds monitoring in environmental samples. Electrophoresis 37:2531–2537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alex SA, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A (2016) State-of-the-art strategies for the colorimetric detection of heavy metals using gold nanorods based on aspect ratio reduction. Anal Methods 8:2131–2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pena-Pereira F (2014) From conventional to miniaturized analytical systems. In: Pena-Pereira F (ed) Miniaturization sample prep. De Gruyter open, Berlin, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pena-Pereira F, Lavilla I, Bendicho C (2010) Liquid-phase microextraction techniques within the framework of green chemistry. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 29:617–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pena-Pereira F, Costas-Mora I, Romero V, Lavilla I, Bendicho C (2011) Advances in miniaturized UV-vis spectrometric systems. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 30:1637–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pena-Pereira F, Lavilla I, Bendicho C (2017) Unmodified gold nanoparticles for in-drop plasmonic-based sensing of iodide. Sensors Actuators B Chem 242:940–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vigderman L, Khanal BP, Zubarev ER (2012) Functional gold nanorods: synthesis, self-assembly, and sensing applications. Adv Mater 24:4811–4841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scarabelli L, Sánchez-Iglesias A, Pérez-Juste J, Liz-Marzán LM (2015) A “ tips and tricks ” practical guide to the synthesis of gold nanorods. J Phys Chem Lett 6:4270–4279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bi N, Hu M, Xu J, Jia L (2017) Colorimetric determination of mercury (II) based on the inhibition of the aggregation of gold nanorods coated with 6-mercaptopurine. Microchim Acta 184:3961–3967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang X, Chen L, Chen L (2014) Colorimetric determination of copper ions based on the catalytic leaching of silver from the shell of silver-coated gold nanorods. Microchim Acta 181:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee S, Nam Y-S, Choi S-H, Lee Y, Lee KB (2016) Highly sensitive photometric determination of cyanide based on selective etching of gold nanorods. Microchim Acta 183:3035–3041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teo PS, Rameshkumar P, Pandikumar A, Jiang ZT, Altarawneh M, Huang NM (2017) Colorimetric and visual dopamine assay based on the use of gold nanorods. Microchim Acta 184:4125–4132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu S, Li D, Gao Z, Wang J (2017) Controlled etching of gold nanorods by the au (III)-CTAB complex, and its application to semi-quantitative visual determination of organophosphorus pesticides. Microchim Acta 184:4383–4391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Costas-Mora I, Romero V, Pena-Pereira F, Lavilla I, Bendicho C (2011) Quantum dot-based headspace single-drop microextraction technique for optical sensing of volatile species. Anal Chem 83:2388–2393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gil S, de Loos-Vollebregt MTC, Bendicho C (2009) Optimization of a single-drop microextraction method for multielemental determination by electrothermal vaporization inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry following in situ vapor generation. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 64:208–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Senra-Ferreiro S, Pena-Pereira F, Lavilla I, Bendicho C (2010) Griess micro-assay for the determination of nitrite by combining fibre optics-based cuvetteless UV-vis micro-spectrophotometry with liquid-phase microextraction. Anal Chim Acta 668:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gómez-Otero E, Costas M, Lavilla I, Bendicho C (2014) Ultrasensitive, simple and solvent-free micro-assay for determining sulphite preservatives (E220-228) in foods by HS-SDME and UV-vis micro-spectrophotometry microextraction techniques. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:2133–2140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cao G, Xu F, Wang S, Xu K, Hou X, Wu P (2017) Gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric assay for selenium detection via hydride generation. Anal Chem 89:4695–4700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rex M, Hernandez FE, Campiglia AD (2006) Pushing the limits of mercury sensors with gold nanorods. Anal Chem 78:445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    James JZ, Lucas D, Koshland CP (2013) Elemental mercury vapor interaction with individual gold nanorods. Analyst 138:2323–2328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zhang Q, Ni Y, Kokot S (2015) The use of DNA self-assembled gold nano-rods for novel analysis of lead and/or mercury in drinking water. Anal Methods 7:4514–4520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang R, Song D, Wang C, Zhu A, Xiao R, Liu J, Long F (2015) Etching of unmodified au@ag nanorods: a tunable colorimetric visualization for the rapid and high selective detection of Hg2+. RSC Adv 5:102542–102549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhu J, Zhao B, Qi Y, Li JJ, Li X, Zhao JW (2018) Colorimetric determination of hg (II) by combining the etching and aggregation effect of cysteine-modified au-ag core-shell nanorods. Sensors Actuators B Chem 255:2927–2935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bi N, Chen Y, Qi H, Zheng X, Chen Y, Liao X, Zhang H, Tian Y (2012) Spectrophotometric determination of mercury (II) ion using gold nanorod as probe. Sensors Actuators B Chem 166-167:766–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chemnasiri W, Hernandez FE (2012) Gold nanorod-based mercury sensor using functionalized glass substrates. Sensors Actuators B Chem 173:322–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bendicho C, Pena F, Costas M, Gil S, Lavilla I (2010) Photochemistry-based sample treatments as greener approaches for trace-element analysis and speciation. TrAC - Trends Anal Chem 29:681–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Analytical and Food Chemistry Department, Faculty of ChemistryUniversity of VigoVigoSpain

Personalised recommendations