Microchimica Acta

, Volume 184, Issue 1, pp 315–321 | Cite as

Microchip HPLC separations monitored simultaneously by coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering and fluorescence detection

  • David Geissler
  • Josef J. Heiland
  • Carsten Lotter
  • Detlev BelderEmail author
Short Communication


Coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) was evaluated and applied to process monitoring in chip-based high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). By stimulating the C≡N-vibration of acetonitrile via laser excitation at 1064 nm and 858.3 nm, solvent gradients can be monitored in real-time. The approach can also be applied to indirect detection, which is exemplarily shown for the separation of short chain alcohols with an eluent containing acetonitrile. CARS was also combined with epi-fluorescence detection by integrating a 365 nm LED as a third excitation source. This allows fluorescent analytes to be detected in parallel to tracing the acetonitrile fraction of the eluent by CARS. This was applied to separate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons within 120 s on custom HPLC glass chips using gradient elution. In this proof of concept study, presenting the first application of CARS in chromatography, the percentage of acetonitrile in the eluent or rather high amounts of alcohols can be traced. If combined with fluorescence, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were detected at the 1 μg·mL−1 range.

Graphical abstract

Parallel coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) and epi-fluorescence detection is realized for microchip liquid chromatography (chip-HPLC) for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Solvent gradients and dead time (t0) can be monitored in real-time by stimulating the acetonitrile C≡N vibration.


CARS Raman Laser excitation Epi-fluorescence detection PAHs Nonlinear optics Liquid chromatorgraphy Microfluidics Separation science Coumarin 120 



We would like to thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the AIF for funding. The author Josef J. Heiland would like to thank the Studienstiftung des dt. Volkes for the financial support in form of a PhD-scholarship. The authors thank Dr. S. Nagl for his helpful support.

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

604_2016_2012_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.9 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1899 kb)


  1. 1.
    Schlücker S, Schaeberle MD, Huffman SW, Levin IW (2003) Raman microspectroscopy: a comparison of point, line, and wide-field imaging methodologies. Anal Chem 75:4312–4318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park T, Lee M, Choo J, Kim Y, Lee EK, Kim DJ, Lee SH (2004) Analysis of passive mixing behavior in a poly (dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic channel using confocal fluorescence and Raman microscopy. Appl Spectrosc 58:1172–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salmon JB, Ajdari A, Tabeling P, Servant L, Talaga D, Joanicot M (2005) In situ Raman imaging of interdiffusion in a microchannel. Appl Phys Lett 86:094106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen L, Choo J (2008) Recent advances in surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection technology for microfluidic chips. Electrophoresis 29:1815–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li DW, Zhai WL, Li YT, Long YT (2014) Recent progress in surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for the detection of environmental pollutants. Microchim Acta 181(1–2):23–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Syme CD, Martino C, Yusvana R, Sirimuthu NM, Cooper JM (2011) Quantitative characterization of individual microdroplets using surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering spectroscopy. Anal Chem 84:1491–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    März A, Ackermann KR, Malsch D, Bocklitz T, Henkel T, Popp J (2009) Towards a quantitative SERS approach–online monitoring of analytes in a microfluidic system with isotope-edited internal standards. J Biophotonics 2:232–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strehle KR, Cialla D, Rösch P, Henkel T, Köhler M, Popp J (2007) A reproducible surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy approach. Online SERS measurements in a segmented microfluidic system. Anal Chem 79:1542–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fleischmann M, Hendra PJ, McQuillan AJ (1974) Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode. Chem Phys Lett 26:163–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freeman RG, Grabar KC, Allison KJ, Bright RM, Davis JA, Guthrie AP, Hommer MB, Jackson MA, Smith PC, Walter DG, Natan MJ (1995) Self-assembled metal colloid monolayers: an approach to SERS substrates. Science 267:1629–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Joseph V, Gensler M, Seifert S, Gernert U, Rabe JP, Kneipp J (2012) Nanoscopic properties and application of mix-and-match plasmonic surfaces for microscopic SERS. J Phys Chem C 116:6859–6865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joseph V, Engelbrekt C, Zhang J, Gernert U, Ulstrup J, Kneipp J (2012) Characterizing the kinetics of nanoparticle-catalyzed reactions by surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:7592–7596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meier TA, Poehler E, Kemper F, Pabst O, Jahnke HG, Beckert E, Robitzki A, Belder D (2015) Fast electrically assisted regeneration of on-chip SERS substrates. Lab Chip 15:2923–2927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moore JS, Jensen KF (2014) “Batch” kinetics in flow: online IR analysis and continuous control. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:470–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ehlert S, Tallarek U (2007) High-pressure liquid chromatography in lab-on-a-chip devices. Anal Bioanal Chem 388:517–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    El-Diasty F (2011) Coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering: spectroscopy and microscopy. Vib Spectrosc 55:1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Evans CL, Xie XS (2008) Coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microscopy: chemical imaging for biology and medicine. Annu Rev Anal Chem 1:883–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang HW, Bao N, Le TL, Lu C, Cheng JX (2008) Microfluidic CARS cytometry. Opt Express 16:5782–5789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bao N, Le TT, Cheng JX, Lu C (2010) Microfluidic electroporation of tumor and blood cells: observation of nucleus expansion and implications on selective analysis and purging of circulating tumor cells. Integr Biol 2:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Camp CH, Yegnanarayanan S, Eftekhar AA, Sridhar H, Adibi A (2009) Multiplex coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering (MCARS) for chemically sensitive, label-free flow cytometry. Opt Express 17:22879–22889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Camp CH, Yegnanarayanan S, Eftekhar AA, Adibi A (2011) Label-free flow cytometry using multiplex coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering (MCARS) for the analysis of biological specimens. Opt Lett 36:2309–2311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bergner G, Chatzipapadopoulos S, Akimov D, Dietzek B, Malsch D, Henkel T, Schlücker S, Popp J (2009) Quantitative CARS microscopic detection of analytes and their isotopomers in a two-channel microfluidic chip. Small 5:2816–2818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bergner G, Albert CR, Schiller M, Bringmann G, Schirmeister T, Dietzek B, Niebling S, Schlücker S, Popp J (2011) Quantitative detection of C-deuterated drugs by CARS microscopy and Raman microspectroscopy. Analyst 136:3686–3693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Åkeson M, Brackmann C, Gustafsson L, Enejder A (2010) Chemical imaging of glucose by CARS microscopy. J Raman Spectrosc 41:1638–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schafer D, Squier JA, van Maarseveen J, Bonn D, Bonn M, Müller M (2008) In situ quantitative measurement of concentration profiles in a microreactor with submicron resolution using multiplex CARS microscopy. J Am Chem Soc 130:11592–11593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schafer D, Müller M, Bonn M, Marr DWM, van Maarseveen J, Squier J (2009) Coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microscopy for quantitative characterization of mixing and flow in microfluidics. Opt Lett 34:211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oshovsky GV, Rago G, Day JPR, Soudijn ML, Rock W, Parekh SH, Ciancaleoni G, Reek JNH, Bonn M (2013) Coherent anti-stokes Raman scattering microspectroscopic kinetic study of fast hydrogen bond formation in microfluidic devices. Anal Chem 85:8923–8927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lotter C, Heiland JJ, Stein V, Klimkait M, Queisser M, Belder D (2016) Evaluation of pressure stable chip-to-tube fittings enabling high-speed chip-hplc with mass spectrometric detection. Anal Chem 88:7481–7486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thurmann S, Dittmar A, Belder D (2014) A low pressure on-chip injection strategy for high-performance chip-based chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1340:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lotter C, Heiland JJ, Thurmann S, Mauritz L, Belder D (2016) HPLC-MS with glass chips featuring monolithically integrated electrospray emitters of different geometries. Anal Chem 88:2856–2863CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Analytical ChemistryUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations