Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, Volume 183, Issue 8, pp 2361–2368 | Cite as

Gold nanoparticle modified screen-printed carbon arrays for the simultaneous electrochemical analysis of lead and copper in tap water

  • Prosper KanyongEmail author
  • Sean Rawlinson
  • James Davis
Original Paper

Abstract

Disposable screen-printed carbon arrays modified with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are described. The AuNP-modified screen-printed carbon arrays, designated as AuNP-SPCE arrays, were characterized by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The AuNP-SPCE arrays display excellent electrocatalytic activity towards lead and copper. Two well-defined and fully resolved anodic stripping peaks, at 20 mV for Pb(II) and at 370 mV for Cu(II), both vs. Ag/AgCl, can be seen. Square wave anodic stripping voltammetry was used to simultaneously analyze Pb(II) and Cu(II) in their binary mixtures in tap water. The linear working range for Pb(II) extends from 10 μg.L−1 to 100 μg.L−1 with a sensitivity of 5.94 μA.μg−1.L.cm−2. The respective data for Cu(II) are a working range from 10 μg.L−1 to 150 μg.L−1 with a sensitivity of 3.52 μA.μg−1.L.cm−2. The limits of detection (based on 3× the baseline noise) are 2.1 ng.L−1 and 1.4 ng.L−1, respectively. In our perception, this array is particularly attractive because Pb(II) and Cu(II) can be determined at rather low working potentials which makes the method fairly selective in that it is not significantly interfered by other electroactive species that require higher reduction potentials.

Graphical abstract

Fabrication, characterization and electrochemical behavior of gold nanoparticles modified screen-printed carbon arrays towards lead and copper in tap water.

Keywords

Nanomaterial-based sensing Screen-printed electrodes Heavy metal analysis Disposable sensor Hexacyanoferrate Cyclic voltammetry Square wave anodic stripping voltammetry Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy Electrode coverage Dual sensing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Department of Employment and Learning Ireland (Grant No.: USI035) and the National Institutes of Health (Grant No.: 5R01ES003154-30) for the funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Goyer RA (1995) Nutrition and metal toxicity. Am J Clin Nutr 611:640S–650SGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patrick L (2006) Lead toxicity, a review of the literature part I: exposure, evaluation and treatement. Altern Med Rev 11:2–22Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goyer RA (1997) Toxic and essential metal interactions. Annu Rev Nutr 17:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaetke LM, Chow CK (2003) Copper toxicity, oxidative stress and antioxidant nutrients. Toxicol 189:147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bulut Y, Tez Z (2007) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by sawdust adsorption. J Environ Sci 19:160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bailey SE, Olin TJ, Bricka RM, Adrian DD (1999) A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res 33:2469–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurmar SR, Agrawal M, Marshall F (2007) Heavy metal contamination of soil and vegetables in surburban areas of Varranasi. India; Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 66:258–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghaedi M, Ahmadi F, Shokrollahi A (2007) Simultaneous preconcentration and determination of copper, nickel, cobalt and lead ions content by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. J Hazard Mater 142:272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ammann AA (2002) Speciation of heavy metals in environment water by ion chromatography coupled to ICP-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 372:448–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Welch CW, Compton RG (2006) The use of nanoparticles in electroanalysis: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 384:601–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fei Y, Lv ZY, Wang AJ, Chen YH, Chen JR, Feng JJ (2014) Simultaneous determination of trace levels of lead (II) and copper (II) by square wave stripping voltammetry using a glassy carbon electrode modified with hierarchical gold dendrites. Microchim Acta 181:389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang L, Chen Z, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2014) Anodic stripping voltammetric determination of traces of Pb (II) and Cd (II) using a glassy carbon electrode modified with bismuth nanoparticles. Microchim Acta 181:1199–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hart JP, Wring SA (1994) Screen-printed voltammetric and amperometric electrochemical sensors for decentralized testing. Electroanal 6:617–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bernalte E, Sánchez CM, Gil EP (2011) Determination of mercury in ambient water samples by anodic stripping voltammetry on screen-printed gold electrodes. Anal Chim Acta 689:60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rueda-Holgado F, Bernalte E, Paomo-Martin M, Calvo-Blácquez L, Cereceda-Balic F, Pinilla-Gil E (2012) Miniaturized voltammetric stripping on screen printed gold electrodes for field determination of copper in atmospheric deposition. Talanata 101:435–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laschi S, Palchetti I, Mascini M (2006) Gold-based screen-printed sensor for detection of trace lead. Sensors Actuators B Chem 114:460–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kanyong P, Rawlinson S, Davis J (2016) Simultaneous electrochemical determination of dopamine and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in urine using a screen-printed graphite electrode modified with gold nanoparticles; anal Bioanal Chem 1-9, doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-9351-0.
  18. 18.
    Fisher LM, Tenje M, Heiskanen AR, Masuda N, Castillo J, Bentien A, et al. (2009) Gold cleaning methods for electrochemical detection applications. Microelectron Eng 86:1282–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Renedo OD, Martinez MJA (2007) Anodic stripping voltammetry of antimony using gold nanoparticle-modified carbon screen-printed electrodes. Anal Chim Acta 589:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang J, Tian B, Nascimento VB, Angnes L (1998) Performance of screen-printed carbon electrodes fabricated from different carbon inks. Electrochim Acta 43:3459–3465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gosser DK (1993) Cyclic voltammetry; simulation and analysis of reaction mechanisms. VCH, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suni II (2008) Impedance methods for electrochemical sensors using nanomaterials. Trends Anal Chem 27:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bard AJ, Faulkner LR (2001) Electrochemical methods; fundamentals and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Echabaane M, Rouis A, Bonnamour I, Ben Quada H (2013) Electrical and electrochemical properties of the MEH-PPV and MEH-PPV doped calix[4]arene derivative layers for the detection of Cu2+ and Na + ions. Measurement 46:2411–2422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kuralay F, Erdem A, Abaci S, Ozyoruk (2013) Electrochemical characterization of redox polymer modified electrode developed for monitoring of adenine; Colloid Surface B 105:1–6.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nolan MA, Kounaves SP (1999) Microfabricated array of iridium microdisks as a substrate for direct determination of Cu2+ or Hg2+ using square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Chem 71:3567–3573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Luther GW III, Swartz CB, Ullman WJ (1988) Direct determination of iodide in seawater by cathodic stripping square wave voltammetry. Anal Chem 60:1721–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wan H, Sun Q, Li H, Sun F, Hu N, Wang P (2015) Screen-printed gold electrode with gold nanoparticles modification for simultaneous electrochemical determination of lead and copper. Sensors Actuators B Chem 209:336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringUlster UniversityJordanstownUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations