Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Toughness Anisotropy on Fracture Initiation Pressure and Morphology in Shale Rocks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 14 September 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Hydraulic Fracturing (HF) is the prime technology for enhanced production from shale plays. Due to their laminations at different scales, shales exhibit transverse isotropic (TI) properties. In most cases the lamination planes are nearly horizontal with the symmetry axis being vertical, therefore, shales are referred to as TI vertical (TIV) rocks. This significantly influences the initiation and propagation of the induced fractures during fracturing operation. However, many studies on HF modeling in shales assume isotropic medium to simplify the problem. The anisotropic toughness is a distinct feature of layered formations such as shales, and its modelling is important to estimate the hydraulic fracturing initiation pressure, as well as the fractures geometry. In this work, to address the effect of TIV properties of the rock, we used the anisotropic toughness to develop the analytical models for fracture initiation pressure (FIP) based on data from the Bakken Shale, as a case study. In particular, we used ResFrac for calculations, which is a fully 3D HF and reservoir numerical simulator. Different scenarios of radial fracture for cases of single and multiple fractures were simulated for isotropic and anisotropic toughness conditions. The results showed that the hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation are strongly affected by the toughness anisotropy. An increase in the magnitude of anisotropy in toughness leads to an increase in the FIP. We also observed that the FIP varies with direction and consequently the fracture becomes more elongated in the direction of the minimum toughness and contained in the direction of the maximum toughness. In the case of multiple HFs, the combined effect of the anisotropy and the stress shadow was observed. This effect was stronger in the anisotropic case compared to the isotropic case. Hence, the isotropic approximation for TIV shale rocks can lead to inaccurate prediction of FIP and incorrect fracture morphology that can possibly affect the HF design.

Highlights

  • A novel analytical model was developed to investigate the fracture initiation pressure and morphology in a medium with anisotropic toughness.

  • Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation showed a strong dependence on the transversely isotropic toughness.

  • The fracture initiation pressure varies with direction and consequently, the fracture becomes more elongated in the direction of the minimum toughness and contained in the direction of the maximum toughness.

  • The simultaneous propagation of multiple hydraulic fractures in anisotropic toughness was characterized by a stronger stress shadow effect compared to the case of isotropic toughness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Change history

Abbreviations

ρ :

Density

E :

Young’s modulus

UCS:

Uniaxial Compressive Strength

T 0 :

Tensile Strength

K IC-isotropic :

Isotropic fracture toughness

K C,1 , K C,2 :

Fracture toughness in the plan of isotropy

K C,3 :

Fracture toughness ⊥ to the plan of isotropy

K I :

Mode I stress intensity factor

:

Friction angle

v :

Poisson’s ratio

K :

Permeability

σ H :

Maximum Horizontal Stress

σ v :

Vertical Stress

σ :

External confining stress

P b :

Wellbore pressure

P p :

Pore pressure

P f :

Internal pressure within the fracture

α :

Local initiation direction angle

μ :

Fluid viscosity

Q :

Flow rate

a :

Borehole radius

x :

Position variable along the fracture

r :

Distance from the wellbore center

L :

Fracture length

f :

Configuration function depends on fracture geometry

X, Y and Z :

Rectangular coordinates

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the North Dakota Industrial Commission (NDIC) for their financial support. Also, we would like to acknowledge other ResFrac team members for providing the support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Benouadah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest in this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benouadah, N., Dontsov, E., Badrouchi, F. et al. Impact of Toughness Anisotropy on Fracture Initiation Pressure and Morphology in Shale Rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 56, 9149–9168 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03502-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03502-0

Keywords

Navigation