Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rock Chip Properties of TBM Penetration in Jointed Rock Masses Based on an Improved DICE2D Simulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most cases, TBM tunnels are constructed in jointed rock masses. Rock chip properties can be used to interpret the response of the rock mass to the TBM tunnelling. Engineering-scale simulations can help us to explain the relationship between rock chip properties and rock mass conditions. In this study, a GPU-based DICE2D programme is presented to meet the computation requirements of the engineering-scale simulation. The smooth joint model (SJM) was also incorporated into DICE2D via an improved joint side checking approach. Using the SJM-embedded DICE2D, a multiple-cutter penetration model was set up. The combined influence of joint spacing and angle on the rock breaking process and rock chip properties were analysed. Further, a rock chip extraction algorithm was proposed to quantify the shape and size distribution. The results showed that in the rock masses with the close joint spacing, the smaller the alpha angle, the blockier the rock chips were. As the joint spacing increase, the rock chips become flat. Both the joint spacing and alpha angle affected the size distribution. The overall size of rock chips decreased with the increasing joint spacing, and first increased with the increasing alpha angle and then decreased when the alpha angle was over 60°. The very closely jointed rock mass at the alpha angle of 90° was an exception because rock slabs would be produced. In addition, in the jointed rock mass with the joint spacing less than 250 mm and 60°–75° alpha angle, or in the highly jointed rock masses with 90° alpha angle, significant differences between the forces acting on the different cutters were revealed.

Highlights

  • An improved DICE2D was presented.

  • TBM penetration in the jointed rock masses at the engineering scale was simulated.

  • Rock chip properties under different joint configurations were analysed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aeberli U, Wanner W (1978) On the influence of discontinuities at the application of tunnelling machines. In: Proceedings of IIIrd International Congress, IAEG, pp 7–14

  • Alehossein H, Hood M (1996) State-of-the-art review of rock models for disc roller cutters. Rock mechanics tools and techniques. Springer, Cham, pp 693–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahaaddini M, Sharrock G, Hebblewhite BK (2013) Numerical direct shear tests to model the shear behaviour of rock joints. Comput Geotech 51:101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barla G, Pelizza S (2000) TBM tunnelling in difficult ground conditions. In: ISRM International Symposium, OnePetro

  • Barton NR (2000) TBM tunnelling in jointed and faulted rock. Crc Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejari H, Hamidi JK (2013) Simultaneous effects of joint spacing and orientation on TBM cutting efficiency in jointed rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:897–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejari H, Reza K, Ataei M, Javad K-H (2011) Simultaneous effects of joint spacing and joint orientation on the penetration rate of a single disc cutter. Min Sci Technol (china) 21:507–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski Z, Celada B, Galera J, Tardáguila I (2008) New applications of the excavability index for selection of TBM types and predicting their performance. In: World Tunnel Congress, pp 1618–1629

  • Bruland A (2000) Hard rock tunnel boring. Fakultet for ingeniørvitenskap og teknologi, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaia B (2001) Fracture mechanisms induced in a brittle material by a hard cutting indenter. Int J Solids Struct 38:7747–7768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook N, Hood M, Tsai F (1984) Observations of crack growth in hard rock loaded by an indenter. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences and geomechanics abstracts. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delisio A, Zhao J, Einstein HH (2013) Analysis and prediction of TBM performance in blocky rock conditions at the Lötschberg Base Tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 33:131–142

  • Ding X, Zhang L (2014) A new contact model to improve the simulated ratio of unconfined compressive strength to tensile strength in bonded particle models. Int J Rock Mech Min 69:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entacher M, Rostami J (2019) TBM performance prediction model with a linear base function and adjustment factors obtained from rock cutting and indentation tests. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 93:103085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entacher M, Schuller E (2018) Angular dependence of rock cutting forces due to foliation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 71:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entacher M, Winter G, Galler R (2013) Cutter force measurement on tunnel boring machines: implementation at Koralm tunnel. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 38:487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrokh E, Rostami J (2008) Correlation of tunnel convergence with TBM operational parameters and chip size in the Ghomroud tunnel, Iran. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23:700–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrokh E, Rostami J, Laughton C (2012) Study of various models for estimation of penetration rate of hard rock TBMs. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 30:110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong QM, Zhao J (2009) Development of a rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction. Int J Rock Mech Min 46:8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong QM, Zhao J, Jiao YY (2005) Numerical modeling of the effects of joint orientation on rock fragmentation by TBM cutters. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 20:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong QM, Jiao YY, Zhao J (2006) Numerical modelling of the effects of joint spacing on rock fragmentation by TBM cutters. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 21:46–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Q, She Q, Wang J, Hou Z, Wu S (2010) Influence of different thicknesses of marble layers on TBM excavation. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 7:1442–1449

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong Q, Yin L, Ma H, Zhao J (2016) TBM tunnelling under adverse geological conditions: An overview. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Q, Wu F, Wang D, Qiu H, Yin L (2021a) Development and application of cutterhead working status monitoring system for shield TBM tunnelling. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54:1731–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Q, Zhou X, Liu Y, Han B, Yin L (2021b) Development of a real-time muck analysis system for assistant intelligence TBM tunnelling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 107:103655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong Q, Xu H, Lu J, Wu F, Zhou X, Yin L (2022) Rock mass characteristics model for TBM penetration rate prediction–an updated version. Int J Rock Mech Min 149:104993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamidi JK, Shahriar K, Rezai B, Rostami J (2010) Performance prediction of hard rock TBM using Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 25:333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Khamehchiyan M, Bruland A, Tavakoli H (2010) TBM performance analysis in pyroclastic rocks: a case history of Karaj water conveyance tunnel. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:427–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour J, Rostami J, Zhao J (2011) A new hard rock TBM performance prediction model for project planning. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 26:595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innaurato N, Oggeri C, Oreste PP, Vinai R (2007) Experimental and numerical studies on rock breaking with TBM tools under high stress confinement. Rock Mech Rock Eng 40:429–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivars DM, Pierce ME, Darcel C, Reyes-Montes J, Potyondy DO, Young RP, Cundall PA (2011) The synthetic rock mass approach for jointed rock mass modelling. Int J Rock Mech Min 48:219–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang MJ, Liao YB, Wang HN, Sun Y (2018) Distinct element method analysis of jointed rock fragmentation induced by TBM cutting. Eur J Environ Civ En 22:s79–s98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XF, Li HB, Liu YQ, Zhou QC, Xia X (2016) Numerical simulation of rock fragmentation mechanisms subject to wedge penetration for TBMs. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 53:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhang Q, Li J, Zhao J (2018a) A numerical study of rock scratch tests using the particle-based numerical manifold method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 78:106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XF, Zhang QB, Li HB, Zhao J (2018b) Grain-based discrete element method (GB-DEM) modelling of multi-scale fracturing in rocks under dynamic loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:3785–3817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Jing L, Zheng X, Li P, Yang C (2019) Application and outlook of information and intelligence technology for safe and efficient TBM construction. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 93:103097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu HY, Kou SQ, Lindqvist PA, Tang CA (2002) Numerical simulation of the rock fragmentation process induced by indenters. Int J Rock Mech Min 39:491–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Liu J, Pan Y, Kong X, Hong K (2017) A case study of TBM performance prediction using a Chinese rock mass classification system–Hydropower Classification (HC) method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 65:140–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Wang J, Wan W (2018a) Numerical study of crack propagation in an indented rock specimen. Comput Geotech 96:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu QS, Jiang YL, Wu ZJ, Qian ZC, Xu XY (2018b) Numerical modeling of acoustic emission during rock failure process using a Voronoi element based - explicit numerical manifold method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 79:175–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Xu M, Qin P (2019) Joints and confining stress influencing on rock fragmentation with double disc cutters in the mixed ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 83:461–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Yang H, Haque E, Wang G (2021a) Effect of joint orientation on the breakage behavior of jointed rock mass loaded by disc cutters. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54:2087–2108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Liao S, Yang Y, Men Y, He J, Huang Y (2021b) Tunnel boring machine vibration-based deep learning for the ground identification of working faces. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma HS, Yin LJ, Ji HG (2011) Numerical study of the effect of confining stress on rock fragmentation by TBM cutters. Int J Rock Mech Min 48:1021–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mas Ivars D, Potyondy D, Pierce M, Cundall PA (2008) The Smooth-Joint Contact Model. In: 8th World Congress on Computational Mechanics (WCCM8), Venice, Italy

  • Mehranpour MH, Kulatilake PHSW (2017) Improvements for the smooth joint contact model of the particle flow code and its applications. Comput Geotech 87:163–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon T, Oh J (2012) A study of optimal rock-cutting conditions for hard rock TBM using the discrete element method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:837–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Wong LNY, Teh CI (2017a) Influence of grain size heterogeneity on strength and microcracking behavior of crystalline rocks. J Geophys Res 122:1054–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Wong LNY, Teh CI, Li Z (2017b) Modeling micro-cracking behavior of bukit timah granite using grain-based model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potyondy DO, Cundall PA (2004) A bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 41:1329–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rispoli A, Ferrero AM, Cardu M, Farinetti A (2017) Determining the particle size of debris from a tunnel boring machine through photographic analysis and comparison between excavation performance and rock mass properties. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:2805–2816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salimi A, Rostami J, Moormann C, Hassanpour J (2018) Examining feasibility of developing a rock mass classification for hard rock TBM application using non-linear regression, regression tree and generic programming. Geotech Geol Eng 36:1145–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Salimi A, Rostami J, Moormann C (2019) Application of rock mass classification systems for performance estimation of rock TBMs using regression tree and artificial intelligence algorithms. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 92:103046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanio H (1985) Prediction of the performance of disc cutters in anisotropic rock. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences and geomechanics abstracts. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Saouma VE, Kleinosky M-J (1984) Finite element simulation of rock cutting: a fracture mechanics approach. The 25th US symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association, Evanston, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapigni M, Berti M, Bethaz E, Busillo A, Cardone G (2002) TBM performance estimation using rock mass classifications. Int J Rock Mech Min 39:771–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schöpfer MP, Abe S, Childs C, Walsh JJ (2009) The impact of porosity and crack density on the elasticity, strength and friction of cohesive granular materials: Insights from DEM modelling. Int J Rock Mech Min 46:250–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su O, Akcin NA (2011) Numerical simulation of rock cutting using the discrete element method. Int J Rock Mech Min 48:434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teale R (1965) The concept of specific energy in rock drilling. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences & geomechanics abstracts. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 57–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Thuro K, Plinninger R (2003) Hard rock tunnel boring, cutting, drilling and blasting: rock parameters for excavatability. In: 10th ISRM Congress, OnePetro

  • Villeneuve MC (2017) Hard rock tunnel boring machine penetration test as an indicator of chipping process efficiency. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9:611–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve MC, Diederichs MS, Kaiser PK (2012) Effects of grain scale heterogeneity on rock strength and the chipping process. Int J Geomech 12:632–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Zhang P, Fan L, Liu Q (2019) Numerical study of the effect of confining pressure on the rock breakage efficiency and fragment size distribution of a TBM cutter using a coupled FEM-DEM method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 88:260–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Gong Q, Li Z, Qiu H, Jin C, Huang L, Yin L (2021) Development and application of cutterhead vibration monitoring system for TBM tunnelling. Int J Rock Mech Min 146:104887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao N, Zhou XP, Gong QM (2017) The modelling of rock breakage process by TBM rolling cutters using 3D FEM-SPH coupled method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 61:90–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Gong Q, Lu J, Yin L, Yang F (2021) Setting up simple estimating equations of TBM penetration rate using rock mass classification parameters. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 115:104065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue Y, Zhou J, Liu C, Shadabfar M, Zhang J (2021) Rock fragmentation induced by a TBM disc-cutter considering the effects of joints: a numerical simulation by DEM. Comput Geotech 136:104230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Liu J, Liu B (2018) Investigation on the cracking character of jointed rock mass beneath TBM disc cutter. Rock Mech Rock Eng 51:1263–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin L, Miao C, He G, Dai F, Gong Q (2016) Study on the influence of joint spacing on rock fragmentation under TBM cutter by linear cutting test. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai SF, Zhou XP, Bi J, Xiao N (2016) The effects of joints on rock fragmentation by TBM cutters using general particle dynamics. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 57:162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G-F (2015) High performance computing and the discrete element model: opportunity and challenge. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XG, Wang J, Chen F, Li PF, Ma LK, Xie JL, Liu YM (2016) Experimental investigations on the thermal conductivity characteristics of Beishan granitic rocks for China’s HLW disposal. Tectonophysics 683:124–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao G-F, Deng Z-Q, Zhang B (2019a) Multibody failure criterion for the four-dimensional lattice spring model. Int J Rock Mech Min 123:104126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao GF, Yin Q, Russell AR, Li Y, Wu W, Li Q (2019b) On the linear elastic responses of the 2D bonded discrete element model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 43:166–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Gong Q, Liu Y, Yin L (2021) Automatic segmentation of TBM muck images via a deep-learning approach to estimate the size and shape of rock chips. Automat Constr 126:103685

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41941019) and the State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering (No. 2021-KY-04). The authors gratefully acknowledge Professor Gaofeng Zhao at the School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University for his development in the open-source DICE2D software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of China, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

    Xiaoxiong Zhou, Qiuming Gong, Hongyi Xu & Lijun Yin

  2. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

    Xiaoxiong Zhou & Xiaoli Liu

Authors
  1. Xiaoxiong Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiuming Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoli Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongyi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lijun Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: QG; methodology: XZ; formal analysis and investigation: QG, XZ; writing—original draft preparation: XZ. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiuming Gong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Gong, Q., Liu, X. et al. Rock Chip Properties of TBM Penetration in Jointed Rock Masses Based on an Improved DICE2D Simulation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55, 7547–7568 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03025-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-03025-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation