Skip to main content

Mapping Fracture Complexity of Fractured Shale in Laboratory: Three-dimensional Reconstruction From Serial-section Images

Abstract

The intrinsic anisotropy of sedimentary rocks such as shale, together with the presence of natural fractures and bedding planes, make it possible for hydraulic fracturing to generate complex fracture networks in unconventional hydrocarbon formations. However, it remains unclear how the fluid driven fractures propagate and how those newly created fractures interact with the pre-existing ones. A laboratory approach is presented in this paper to three-dimensionally (3D) map the fracture complexity of a hydraulically fractured shale sample. The 3D fracture model created using the serial-section reconstruction approach has a high spatial resolution of 39 × 39 × 50 µm3, and is considered trustworthy based on the geometrical similarity to the fracture network reconstructed from the accessible X-ray micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) at a lower resolution. According to the 3D fracture model, the fracture network predominately comprises of pre-existing fractures further opened by hydraulic fracturing testing, which significantly affects the whole network geometry. The opened natural fractures appear rougher than the opened bedding planes, indicating different mechanical influences on fracture propagation. This high-resolution fracture dataset is valuable not only for the investigation of hydraulic fracturing mechanisms, but also for fracture aperture quantification and evaluation of the fluid transmissivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tigris yellow D-043, DAYGLO Color Corp., 4515 St. Clair Ave., Cleveland, Ohio, 44,103 USA.

  2. 2.

    Fluorescent Red ADA3225, H.W. Sands Corp., 1003 W. Indiantown Rd., Suite 215, Jupiter, Florida, 33,458 USA.

  3. 3.

    Dragonfly 4.1 software. Object Research Systems (ORS) Inc, Montreal, Canada, 2018.

References

  1. Abdelaziz A, Ha J, Abul Khair H, Adams M, Tan CP, Musa IH, Grasselli G (2019) Unconventional shale hydraulic fracturing under true triaxial laboratory conditions, the value of understanding your reservoir. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Society of Petroleum Engineers

  2. Fisher MK, Warpinski NR (2012) Hydraulic-fracture-height growth: real data. SPE Prod Oper 27:8–19

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frangi AF, Niessen WJ, Vincken KL, Viergever MA (1998) Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Berlin, pp 130–137

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gale JFW, Laubach SE, Olson JE, Eichhubl P, Fall A (2014) Natural fractures in shale: a review and new observations. AAPG Bull 98:2165–2216. https://doi.org/10.1306/08121413151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gale JF, Elliott SJ, Laubach SE (2018) Hydraulic fractures in core from stimulated reservoirs: core fracture description of HFTS slant core, Midland Basin, West Texas. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston Texas. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp 1340–1357

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levinthal C, Ware R (1972) Three dimensional reconstruction from serial sections. Nature 236:207–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li K (2008) The image stabilizer plugin for ImageJ. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kangli/code/Image_Stabilizer.html

  8. Li C, Lafollette R, Sookprasong A, Wang S (2013) Characterization of hydraulic fracture geometry in shale gas reservoirs using early production data. In: International petroleum technology conference. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, pp cp-350–00353

  9. Lombos L, Roberts D, King M (2013) Design and development of integrated true triaxial testing system. True triaxial testing of rocks. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Magsipoc E (2018) Surface roughness calculator version 0.5. https://geogroup.utoronto.ca/software/

  11. Magsipoc E, Li M, Abdelaziz A, Ha J, Peterson K, Grasselli G (2020) Analysis of the fracture morphologies from a laboratory hydraulic fracture experiment on montney shale. In: ARMA/DGS/SEG international geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association

  12. Malek S, Mosleh M, Dhillon SK, Milow P (2019) Bioimage informatics. Encycl Bioinform Comput Biol 2:993–1010

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maxwell SC, Urbancic T, Steinsberger N, Zinno R (2002) Microseismic imaging of hydraulic fracture complexity in the Barnett shale. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers

  14. Nasseri M, Rezanezhad F, Young R (2011) Analysis of fracture damage zone in anisotropic granitic rock using 3D X-ray CT scanning techniques. Int J Fract 168:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramandi HL, Mostaghimi P, Armstrong RT (2017) Digital rock analysis for accurate prediction of fractured media permeability. J Hydrol 554:817–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schindelin J et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmid B, Schindelin J, Cardona A, Longair M, Heisenberg M (2010) A high-level 3D visualization API for Java and ImageJ. BMC Bioinformatics 11:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sengur A, Budak U, Akbulut Y, Karabatak M, Tanyildizi E (2019) A survey on neutrosophic medical image segmentation. Neutrosophic set in medical image analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 145–165

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Shrivastava K, Hwang J, Sharma M (2018) Formation of complex fracture networks in the wolfcamp shale: calibrating model predictions with core measurements from the hydraulic fracturing test site. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. society of petroleum engineers

  20. Tan P, Jin Y, Han K, Hou B, Chen M, Guo X, Gao J (2017) Analysis of hydraulic fracture initiation and vertical propagation behavior in laminated shale formation. Fuel 206:482–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tatone BS, Grasselli G (2009) A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials. Rev Sci Instrum 80:125110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thevenaz P, Ruttimann UE, Unser M (1998) A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans Image Process 7:27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tseng Q, Duchemin-Pelletier E, Deshiere A, Balland M, Guillou H, Filhol O, Théry M (2012) Spatial organization of the extracellular matrix regulates cell–cell junction positioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:1506–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Voorn M, Exner U, Rath A (2013) Multiscale Hessian fracture filtering for the enhancement and segmentation of narrow fractures in 3D image data. Comput Geosci 57:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Young R, Nasseri M, Lombos L (2012) Imaging the effect of the intermediate principal stress on strength, deformation and transport properties of rocks using seismic methods. True triaxial testing of rocks. Balkema, Taylor and Francisco Group, pp 167–179

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yushi Z, Shicheng Z, Tong Z, Xiang Z, Tiankui G (2016) Experimental investigation into hydraulic fracture network propagation in gas shales using CT scanning technology. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported through the Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grants 341275, and NSERC/Energi Simulation Industrial Research Chair program. The authors would like to acknowledge Petronas Canada for providing the full-diameter core samples, Dr. M.H.B Nasseri and the Rock Fracture Dynamics Facility laboratory for their assistance in conducting the true triaxial hydraulic fracturing experiment, Aflah Ahmad Zul Kamal at University of Toronto for the assistance in serial sectioning, and acknowledge the contribution of NVIDIA Corporation with the donation of one GPU used for this work. The authors would also like to thank the team at the STTARR Innovation Centre in Princess Margaret Cancer Centre at the University Health Network.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., Magsipoc, E., Abdelaziz, A. et al. Mapping Fracture Complexity of Fractured Shale in Laboratory: Three-dimensional Reconstruction From Serial-section Images. Rock Mech Rock Eng (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02540-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hydraulic fracture imaging
  • Serial-section reconstruction
  • Fracture complexity
  • Fracture classification
  • Fracture roughness