Abstract
Tunneling in karstic geology confronts numerous challenges due to unpredictable occurrence of voids. The current approach of karstic void risk assessment is qualitative or semi-quantitative and lacks consideration of the spatial variability and distribution of voids. This often influences the pricing strategies, and design and construction activities on tunnel projects. This paper presents a geostatistical modeling-based methodology to develop a quantitative assessment of karstic void risk for a tunnel project in a karstic geological setting. The methodology is applied on an actual mixed-ground tunnel project situated in a karstic geological environment in Malaysia. The geology at the tunnel project site consists of sedimentary rock formations with limestone as the predominant rock type overlain by weak sedimentary residual soils. Pluri-Gaussian simulation (PGS) technique, a stochastic geostatistical-modeling algorithm, is applied to characterize the spatial distribution of voids in 3D along tunnel alignment. Simulations from PGS take into consideration the anisotropic distribution of voids on the tunnel project site. PGS utilizes void data from borehole investigations to model different void sizes (Vs) as categorical variables. The variability in multiple realizations from PGS technique is used to quantify the uncertainty in occurrence probabilities, number, and frequency of karstic voids. The proposed methodology demonstrates the ability to develop probabilistic estimates of occurrence frequency of different void sizes. Probabilistic assessments indicating 95% confidence interval (CI) on number of voids and respective occurrence probabilities are presented. The probabilistic assessment results are applied to estimate the grout quantity required for void treatment, while considering uncertainty in void occurrence. A minimum, mean, and maximum cumulative grout volume of about 2000 m3, 4000 m3, and 8000 m3 (for 95% CI), respectively, is estimated along the alignment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data used for this study are available from the corresponding author by reasonable request.
Code Availability
All code generated for this study is available from the corresponding author by reasonable request.
References
Armstrong M, Galli A, Beucher H, LeLoch G, Renard D, Doligez B, Eschard R, Geffroy F (2011) Plurigaussian simulations in geosciences, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Boon CW, Ooi LH, Tan JG, Goh CY (2020) Deep excavation of an underground metro station in karstic limestone: a case history in the Klang Valley SSP Line. Springer, Singapore
Carle SF, Fogg GE (1997) Modeling spatial variability with one and multidimensional continuous-Lag Markov chains. Math Geol 29:891–918. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022303706942
Cheng WC, Cui QL, Shen JSL, Arulajah A, Yuan DJ (2017) Fractal prediction of grouting volume for treating karst caverns along a shield tunneling alignment. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7070652
Chiles JP, Delfiner P (2009) Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York
Cressie N (1985) Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares. J Int Assoc Math Geol 17:563–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01032109
Cui QL, Wu HN, Shen SL, Xu YS, Ye GL (2015) Chinese karst geology and measures to prevent geohazards during shield tunnelling in karst region with caves. Nat Hazards 77:129–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1585-6
Day MJ (2004) Karstic problems in the construction of Milwaukee’s Deep Tunnels. Environ Geol 45:859–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0945-4
Dubrule O (2017) Indicator variogram models: do we have much choice? Math Geosci 49:441–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-017-9678-x
Duringer P, Bacon AM, Sayavongkhamdy T, Nguyen TKT (2012) Karst development, breccias history, and mammalian assemblages in Southeast Asia: a brief review. Comptes Rendus-Palevol 11:133–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2011.07.003
Einstein HH, Salazar GF, Kim YW, Ioannou PG (1987) Computer based decision support systems for underground construction. In: Proceeding of the rapid excavation tunneling conference, pp 1287–1307
Emery X (2007) Simulation of geological domains using the plurigaussian model: New developments and computer programs. Comput Geosci 33:1189–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.01.006
Eskesen SD, Tengborg P, Kampmann J, Holst Veicherts T (2004) Guidelines for tunnelling risk management: International Tunnelling Association, Working Group No. 2. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 19:217–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2004.01.001
Felletti F, Pietro BG (2009) Expectation of boulder frequency when tunneling in glacial till: a statistical approach based on transition probability. Eng Geol 108:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.06.006
Ford D, Williams PD (2013) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. Wiley, New York
Gangrade R, Mooney M, Trainor-Guitton W (2020) Incorporating spatial uncertainty into site investigations for tunneling applications. Geo-Congress 2020: engineering, monitoring, and management of geotechnical infrastructure. ASCE, Reston, pp 345–354
Gangrade R, Mooney MA (2020) Quantification of stratigraphic transition location uncertainty for tunneling projects. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng (In Review)
Grasmick JG (2019) Modeling spatial geotechnical parameter uncertainty and quantitative tunneling risks. Colorado School of Mines
Grasmick JG, Maxwell A, Gangrade R, Mooney MA (2020a) Probabilistic subsurface modelling in tunnelling applications: suggestions for use in practice. In: ITA-AITES world tunnel congress, WTC 2020 and 46th general assembly, Kuala Lumpur
Grasmick JG, Mooney MA, Trainor-Guitton WJ, Walton G (2020b) Global versus local simulation of geotechnical parameters for tunneling projects. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 146:04020048. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002262
Huber M, Marconi F, Moscatelli M (2015) Risk-based characterisation of an urban building site. Georisk 9:49–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2015.1015574
Isaksson T (2002) Model for estimation of time and cost based on risk evaluation applied on tunnel projects. Byggvetenskap
Kovačević MS, Bačić M, Gavin K (2020) Application of neural networks for the reliability design of a tunnel in karst rock mass. Can Geotech J 467:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2019-0693
Li L, Lei T, Li S, Zhang Q, Xu Z, Shi S, Zhou Z (2015) Risk assessment of water inrush in karst tunnels and software development. Arab J Geosci 8:1843–1854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1365-3
Lichtenberg S (1990) Projekt Planlaegning–i en foranderlig verden. Polyteknisk Forlag, Denmark
Ma Z (2019) Quantitative geosciences: data analytics, geostatistics reservoir characterization and modeling. Springer, New York
Madani N, Emery X (2015) Simulation of geo-domains accounting for chronology and contact relationships: application to the Río Blanco copper deposit. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29:2173–2191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-0997-x
Madani N, Maleki M, Emery X (2019) Nonparametric geostatistical simulation of subsurface facies: tools for validating the reproduction of, and uncertainty in, facies geometry. Nat Resour Res 28:1163–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-9444-x
Maleki M, Emery X, Mery N (2017) Indicator variograms as an aid for geological interpretation and modeling of ore deposits. Minerals 7:241. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7120241
Medley EW (2002) Estimating block size distributions of melanges and similar block-in-matrix rocks (bimrocks). In: Proceeding of the 5th North American rock mechanics symposium, Toronto
Paraskevopoulou C, Benardos A (2013) Assessing the construction cost of Greek transportation tunnel projects. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 38:497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.08.005
Piccini L, Mecchia M (2009) Solution weathering rate and origin of karst landforms and caves in the quartzite of Auyan-tepui (Gran Sabana, Venezuela). Geomorphology 106:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.09.019
Pyrcz MJ, Deutsch CV (2014) Geostatistical reservoir modeling. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ren DJ, Shen SL, Cheng WC, Zhang N, Wang ZF (2016) Geological formation and geo-hazards during subway construction in Guangzhou. Environ Earth Sci 75:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5710-6
Shahriar K, Sharifzadeh M, Hamidi JK (2008) Geotechnical risk assessment based approach for rock TBM selection in difficult ground conditions. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 23:318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.06.012
Tang BW, Asce M, Quek ST (1986) Statistical model of boulder size and fraction. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 112:79–90
van der Pouw Kraan M (2014) Rockmass behavioural uncertainty: Implications for hard rock tunnel geotechnical baseline reports. Queens University, Canada
Waltham AC, Fookes PG (2003) Engineering classification of karst ground conditions. Quart J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 36:101–118. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/2002-33
Wang X, Lai J, He S, Garnes RS, Zhang Y (2020) Karst geology and mitigation measures for hazards during metro system construction in Wuhan, China. Nat Hazards 103:2905–2927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04108-3
Webster R, Oliver MA (1992) Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties. Eur J Soil Sci 43:177–192. https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2013-1-2-191
Xeidakis GS, Torok A, Skias S, Kleb B (2004) Engineering geological problems associated with Karst Terrains: Their Investigation. Monitoring, and Mitigation and Design of Engineering Structures on Karst Terrains. Bull Geol Soc Greece 36:1932. Doi: https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.16679
Yang J, Zhang C, Fu J, Wang S, Ou X, Xie Y (2020) Pre-grouting reinforcement of underwater karst area for shield tunneling passing through Xiangjiang River in Changsha. China Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 100:103380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103380
Yau K, Paraskevopoulou C, Konstantis S (2020) Spatial variability of karst and effect on tunnel lining and water inflow: a probabilistic approach. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103248
Zabidi H, De Freitas MH (2013) Geospatial analysis in identifying karst cavity distribution: the SMART Tunnel, Malaysia. Carbonates Evaporites 28:125–133
Zarei HR, Uromeihy A, Sharifzadeh M (2010) Identifying geological hazards related to tunneling in carbonate karstic rocks-Zagros. Iran Arab J Geosci 5:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0218-y
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the University Transportation Center for Underground Transportation Infrastructure (UTC-UTI) at the Colorado School of Mines for funding this research under Grant No. 69A3551747118 from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not of the DOT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RG: conceptualization, methodology, software, exploratory data analysis, visualization, and writing—original draft. JG: conceptualization, resources, writing-review, and editing. MAM: resources, supervision, funding acquisition, writing—review, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gangrade, R.M., Grasmick, J.G. & Mooney, M.A. Probabilistic Assessment of Void Risk and Grouting Volume for Tunneling Applications. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55, 2771–2786 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02528-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02528-6