Skip to main content
Log in

The Effective Stress Coefficient of Coal: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effective stress coefficient (ESC) is a key parameter in the linear poroelastic effective stress formulation. In fluid-bearing porous media, the effective stress is the difference between total stress and a fraction of the pore fluid pressure controlled by the ESC. The ESC is either measured in the laboratory or estimated by empirical models using field data. Among different techniques, sonic velocity measurements are widely used to estimate the ESC. The structure of coal, however, has some inherent differences to other porous rocks which in turn affect its hydromechanical behavior. For instance, there is no clear definition of grains and matrix in coal making it unclear whether coal, even when saturated by a non-sorbing gas, follows the same principles of sonic-based estimation of the ESC applicable to other rocks. In this study, we develop a model based on the percolation theory and ultrasonic measurements of coal samples saturated with non-sorbing gases to obtain the ESC. To assess the assumptions used in the development of this model, we measured the ESC of different coal samples through two independent, extensive sets of hydromechanical experiments: static and dynamic (ultrasonic). We then compared the results of these experiments with each other and with some of the existing models and evaluated the performance of the percolation-based model in depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Obtained data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Abbreviations

\(\sigma\) :

Total stress

\(\sigma^{\prime}\) :

Effective stress

p :

Pore pressure

\(P_{{\text{d}}}\) :

The differential pressure between the confinement and pore pressure

\(\gamma\) :

Effective stress coefficient (ESC) from the static (hydromechanical) experiment

\(\gamma^{{{\text{dyn}}}}\) :

Effective stress coefficient (ESC) from the dynamic (ultrasonic) experiment

K :

Bulk modulus from the static (hydromechanical) experiment

\(K^{{{\text{dyn}}}}\) :

Bulk modulus from the dynamic (ultrasonic) experiment

K s :

Solid bulk modulus from the static (hydromechanical) experiment

\(K_{{\text{s}}}^{{{\text{dyn}}}}\) :

Solid bulk modulus from the dynamic (ultrasonic) experiment

G :

Shear modulus from the static (hydromechanical) experiment

\(G^{{{\text{dyn}}}}\) :

Shear modulus from the dynamic (ultrasonic) experiment

G s :

Shear modulus of solid from the static (hydromechanical) experiment

\(G_{{\text{s}}}^{{{\text{dyn}}}}\) :

Shear modulus of solid from the dynamic (ultrasonic) experiment

\(\rho_{{\text{b}}}\) :

Bulk density

\(\rho_{{\text{s}}}\) :

Solid density

E :

Young’s modulus

\(\phi\) :

Porosity

\(\phi_{{\text{N}}}\) :

Critical porosity

V p :

Compressional (P) wave velocity

\(V_{{\text{p}}}^{{\text{s}}}\) :

Compressional (P) wave velocity of the solid phase

V s :

Shear (S) wave velocity

\(V_{{\text{s}}}^{{\text{s}}}\) :

Shear (S) wave velocity of the solid phase

References

  • Agudo ÒC, da Silva NV, Warner M, Morgan J (2018) Acoustic full-waveform inversion in an elastic world. Geophysics 83:R257–R271

    Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Amiri M, Lashkaripour GR, Ghabezloo S, Moghaddas NH, Tajareh MH (2019) 3D spatial model of Biot’s effective stress coefficient using well logs, laboratory experiments, and geostatistical method in the Gachsaran oil field, southwest of Iran. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78:4633–4646

    Google Scholar 

  • Avseth P, Mukerji T, Mavko G, Dvorkin J (2010) Rock-physics diagnostics of depositional texture, diagenetic alterations, and reservoir heterogeneity in high-porosity siliciclastic sediments and rocks—a review of selected models and suggested work flows. Geophysics 75:75A31-75A47

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer A, Bhuiyan MH, Fjær E, Holt RM, Lozovyi S, Pohl M, Szewczyk D (2016) Frequency-dependent wave velocities in sediments and sedimentary rocks: laboratory measurements and evidences. Lead Edge 35:490–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Boadu FK (2018) Regression models to estimate critical porosity of soils from basic soil properties based on percolation theory. Geotech Geol Eng 36:1207–1216

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulanger P, Hayes M (1995) Waves in elastic media. In: Galdi GP (ed) Stability and wave propagation in fluids and solids. Springer Vienna, Vienna, pp 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-3004-9_1

  • Bourbié T, Coussy O, Zinszner B, Junger MC (1992) Acoustics of porous media. Acoustical Society of America

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutéca M, Sarda J-P, Laurent J (1991) Rock mechanics contribution to the determination of fluid flow properties. In: Second European core analysis symposium (Eurocas II), Bruxelles

  • Broadbent SR, Hammersley JM (1957) Percolation processes: I. Crystals and mazes. In: Mathematical proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol 3. Cambridge University Press, pp 629–641

  • Cheadle M, Elliott M, McKenzie D (2004) Percolation threshold and permeability of crystallizing igneous rocks: the importance of textural equilibrium. Geology 32:757–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Liu J, Pan Z, Connell LD, Elsworth D (2012) Influence of the effective stress coefficient and sorption-induced strain on the evolution of coal permeability: model development and analysis. Int J Greenh Gas Control 8:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng AH-D (2016) Poroelasticity, vol 27. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen N, Wang H (1985) The influence of pore pressure and confining pressure on dynamic elastic properties of Berea sandstone. Geophysics 50:207–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Detournay E, Cheng AHD (1988) Poroelastic response of a borehole in a non-hydrostatic stress field. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 25:171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorkin J, Nur A (1996) Elasticity of high-porosity sandstones: theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics 61:1363–1370

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart-Phillips D, Han D-H, Zoback M (1989) Empirical relationships among seismic velocity, effective pressure, porosity, and clay content in sandstone. Geophysics 54:82–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Engstrøm F (1992) Rock mechanical properties of Danish North Sea chalk. In: Fourth north sea chalk symposium, Deauville

  • Fabre D, Gustkiewicz J (1998) Influence of rock porosity on the Biot’s coefficient. In: Poromechanics-a tribute to Maurice A. Biot”, Proc. of the Biot Conf. on Poromech., Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium), pp 14–16

  • Fang Y, Shi Y, Sheng Y, Zhang Z (2018) Modeling of Biot’s coefficient for a clay-bearing sandstone reservoir. Arab J Geosci 11:302

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjær E (2019) Relations between static and dynamic moduli of sedimentary rocks. Geophys Prospect 67:128–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche H (1974) Electronic properties of amorphous semiconductors. In: Amorphous and liquid semiconductors. Springer, pp 221–312

  • Gholami A, Aghighi MA, Rahman SS (2017) Effect of non-uniform pore pressure fields on hydraulic fracture propagation. J Petrol Sci Eng 159:889–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1961) Note on a variational approach to the theory of composite elastic materials. J Franklin Inst 271:336–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornby BE (1996) An experimental investigation of effective stress principles for sedimentary rocks. In: SEG Technical program expanded abstracts 1996. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 1707–1710

  • Hovem JM (1995) Acoustic waves in finely layered media. Geophysics 60:1217–1221

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt A (2005) Percolation theory for flow in porous media. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasinge D, Ranjith P, Choi S (2011) Effects of effective stress changes on permeability of latrobe valley brown coal. Fuel 90:1292–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkan E (2016) An automatic P-phase arrival-time picker. Bull Seismol Soc Am 106:971–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaksar A, Griffiths C, McCann C (1999) Effective stress coefficient for P- and S-wave velocity and quality factor in sandstone, example from Cooper Basin-Australia. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 1999. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 192–195

  • Kováčik J (2001) Correlation between shear modulus and porosity in porous materials. J Mater Sci Lett 20:1953–1955

    Google Scholar 

  • Kováčik J, Emmer Š (2013) Correlation between shear wave velocity and porosity in porous solids and rocks. J Powder Technol 2013:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Krief M, Garat J, Stellingwerff J, Ventre J (1990) A petrophysical interpretation using the velocities of P and S waves (full-waveform sonic) The Log Analyst. 31

  • Küperkoch L, Meier T, Lee J, Friederich W, Group EW (2010) Automated determination of P-phase arrival times at regional and local distances using higher order statistics. Geophys J Int 181:1159–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee MW (2002) Biot-Gassmann theory for velocities of gas hydrate-bearing sediments. Geophysics 67:1711–1719

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Chen Z, Elsworth D, Qu H, Chen D (2011) Interactions of multiple processes during CBM extraction: a critical review. Int J Coal Geol 87:175–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2011.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q, Cheng Y, Zhou H, Guo P, An F, Chen H (2015) A mathematical model of coupled gas flow and coal deformation with gas diffusion and Klinkenberg effects. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1163–1180

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo X, Were P, Liu J, Hou Z (2015) Estimation of Biot’s effective stress coefficient from well logs Environ. Earth Sci 73:7019–7028

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv A, Ramandi HL, Masoumi H, Saadatfar M, Regenauer-Lieb K, Roshan H (2019b) Analytical and experimental investigation of pore pressure induced strain softening around boreholes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 113:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv A, Masoumi H, Walsh SD, Roshan H (2019a) Elastic-softening-plasticity around a borehole: an analytical and experimental study. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:1149–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Zoback MD (2017) Laboratory experiments simulating poroelastic stress changes associated with depletion and injection in low-porosity sedimentary rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 122:2478–2503

    Google Scholar 

  • Mari J-L, Coppens F, Gavin P (1994) Full waveform acoustic data processing. Editions Technip

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion DP, Coudin P (1992) Fram ray to effective medium theories in stratified media: an experimental study. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 1992. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 1341–1343

  • Martin LP, Dadon D, Rosen M (1996) Evaluation of ultrasonically determined elasticity-porosity relations in zinc oxide. J Am Ceram Soc 79:1281–1289

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller MN (1969) Bounds for effective bulk modulus of heterogeneous materials. J Math Phys 10:2005–2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Morcote A, Mavko G, Prasad M (2010) Dynamic elastic properties of coal. Geophysics 75:E227–E234

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy W, Reischer A, Hsu K (1993) Modulus decomposition of compressional and shear velocities in sand bodies. Geophysics 58:227–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Njiekak G, Schmitt DR (2019) Effective stress coefficient for seismic velocities in carbonate rocks: effects of pore characteristics and fluid types. Pure Appl Geophys 176:1467–1485

    Google Scholar 

  • Nur A, Byerlee JD (1971) An exact effective stress law for elastic deformation of rock with fluids. J Geophys Res 76:6414–6419

    Google Scholar 

  • Nur A, Mavko G, Dvorkin J, Galmudi D (1998) Critical porosity: a key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks. Lead Edge 17:357–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen C, Hedegaard K, Fabricius IL, Prasad M (2008) Prediction of Biot’s coefficient from rock-physical modeling of North Sea chalk. Geophysics 73:E89–E96

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovshinsky SR, Fritzsche H (1973) Amorphous semiconductors for switching, memory, and imaging applications. IEEE Trans Electron Dev 20:91–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan J, Meng Z, Hou Q, Ju Y, Cao Y (2013) Coal strength and Young’s modulus related to coal rank, compressional velocity and maceral composition. J Struct Geol 54:129–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappalardo G (2015) Correlation between P-wave velocity and physical–mechanical properties of intensely jointed dolostones, Peloritani mounts, NE Sicily. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:1711–1721

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott L, Patel R, Killoh D, Jennings H (1984) Effect of age on diffusion in hydrated alite cement. J Am Ceram Soc 67:233–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett GR (1963) Acoustic character logs and their applications in formation evaluation. J Pet Technol 15:659–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirzada MA, Zoorabadi M, Ramandi HL, Canbulat I, Roshan H (2018) CO2 sorption induced damage in coals in unconfined and confined stress states: a micrometer to core scale investigation. Int J Coal Geol 198:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Plapous C, Marro C, Scalart P (2006) Improved signal-to-noise ratio estimation for speech enhancement. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process 14:2098–2108

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers TC (1958) Structure and physical properties of hardened Portland cement paste. J Am Ceram Soc 41:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Radke M, Schaefer RG, Leythaeuser D, Teichmüller M (1980) Composition of soluble organic matter in coals: relation to rank and liptinite fluorescence. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 44:1787–1800

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymer L, Hunt E, Gardner JS An improved sonic transit time-to-porosity transform. In: SPWLA 21st annual logging symposium, 1980. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts

  • Roshan H, Aghighi MA (2012) Formation of plastic zone and resulted stresses around a borehole drilled in chemically active rock from 2D and 3D finite element modeling. Int J Geomech (Under revision)

  • Roshan H, Masoumi H, Hagan P (2016) On size-dependent uniaxial compressive strength of sedimentary rocks in reservoir geomechanics. In: 50th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association

  • Roshan H, Masoumi H, Regenauer-Lieb K (2017) Frictional behaviour of sandstone: a sample-size dependent triaxial investigation. J Struct Geol 94:154–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshan H, Lv A, Xu Y, Masoumi H, Regenauer-Lieb K (2019) New generation of hoek cells geotechnical testing journal. Geotech Test J 42:747–760. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakurovs R, He L, Melnichenko YB, Radlinski AP, Blach T, Lemmel H, Mildner DF (2012) Pore size distribution and accessible pore size distribution in bituminous coals. Int J Coal Geol 100:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Sang G, Elsworth D, Liu S, Harpalani S (2017) Characterization of swelling modulus and effective stress coefficient accommodating sorption-induced swelling in coal. Energy Fuels 31:8843–8851

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarker R, Batzle M (2008) Effective stress coefficient for North Sea shale: an experimental study. In: SEG technical program expanded abstracts 2008. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 1620–1624

  • Saurabh S, Harpalani S, Singh V (2016) Implications of stress re-distribution and rock failure with continued gas depletion in coalbed methane reservoirs. Int J Coal Geol 162:183–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidler R (2015) A porosity-based Biot model for acoustic waves in snow. J Glaciol 61:789–798. https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG15J040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggins AF, Dewhurst DN (2003) Saturation, pore pressure and effective stress from sandstone acoustic properties. Geophys Res Lett 30:61-1–61-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Skempton A, Bishop A (1954) Building materials: their elasticity and inelasticity edited by M. Reiner. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley RA, Jackson HL (2016) Chemistry and the chemical industry: a practical guide for non-chemists. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadtmuller M, Lis-Śledziona A, Słota-Valim M (2018) Petrophysical and geomechanical analysis of the Lower Paleozoic shale formation, North Poland. Interpretation 6:SH91–SH106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulem J, Ouffroukh H (2006) Shear banding in drained and undrained triaxial tests on a saturated sandstone: Porosity and permeability evolution. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:292–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1923) Die brechnung der durchlassigkeitsziffer des tones aus dem verlauf der hydrodynamischen spannungserschinungen Sitz Akad Wissen. Wien Math Naturwiss Kl, Abt IIa 132:105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd T, Simmons G (1972) Effect of pore pressure on the velocity of compressional waves in low-porosity rocks. J Geophys Res 77:3731–3743

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardakis JC, Chou D, Tully BJ, Hung CC, Lee TH, Tsui P-H, Ventikos Y (2016) Investigating cerebral oedema using poroelasticity. Med Eng Phys 38:48–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth B, Sobey I (2006) An axisymmetric and fully 3D poroelastic model for the evolution of hydrocephalus. Math Med Biol J IMA 23:363–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyllie MRJ, Gregory AR, Gardner LW (1956) Elastic wave velocities in heterogeneous and porous media. Geophysics 21:41–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu H (2015) Dynamic effective pressure coefficient calibration. Geophysics 80:D65–D73

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Zhang R, Wu S, Deng J, Zhang Z, Xie J (2019) The stress sensitivity and porosity sensitivity of coal permeability at different depths: a case study in the Pingdingshan mining area. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:1539–1563

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu M, Wang L, Liu X, Zhao J (2018) Accurate identification of microseismic P- and S-phase arrivals using the multi-step AIC algorithm. J Appl Geophys 150:284–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW (1990) Compressibility of sandstones. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman RW, Somerton WH, King MS (1986) Compressibility of porous rocks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 91:12765–12777

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP), project number C27027. Adelina Lv acknowledges the Australian Government Research Training Program for the PhD scholarship.

Funding

Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP), project number C27027.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hossein Masoumi or Hamid Roshan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lv, A., Aghighi, M.A., Masoumi, H. et al. The Effective Stress Coefficient of Coal: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 3891–3907 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02476-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02476-1

Keywords

Navigation