Skip to main content
Log in

FracProp: Stochastic Fracture Propagation Model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a geometric, mechanics-based, stochastic model—FracProp—that was developed to predict fracture initiation and propagation in rock. FracProp is capable of quantifying uncertainties associated with the point of fracture initiation and direction of fracture propagation. The current version of FracProp uses compounded probability distributions that are continuously fitted based on mechanical principles (stress distribution and material properties). The model assumes that fracture initiation and propagation depend on the stress profiles around the fracture (flaw) tip in a rock block subjected to vertical, horizontal, and internal loading. To develop the model, we studied the mechanics of a rock block containing one single flaw (pre-existing opening) with the Finite Element (FE) software ABAQUS. Stress profiles obtained in the modeling were used with the model’s probabilistic processes to dynamically simulate (model) crack/fracture propagation. FracProp was validated with the results of experiments under various loading conditions done at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) geomechanics laboratory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The center of the tip of the ith propagation step is \({c}_{i}\). Any point on the semicircular path is mathematically described based on the center coordinates (\({c}_{i}\)), radius (\({r}_{i}\)) and angle (\({\widehat{\psi }}_{i}\)) as in Eq. (8). This equation is used extensively in FracProp to transform polar coordinates to Cartesian coordinates (See Fig. 16).

References

  • Abdulla M, Sousa RL (2018) EllipFrac: Stochastic DFN reservoir characterization software. 2nd International Discrete Fracture Network Engineering Conference, 20–22 June, Seattle, WA, USA

  • Agwai A, Guven I, Madenci E (2011) Predicting crack propagation with peridynamics: a comparative study. Int J Fract 171:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobet A (1997) Fracture coalescence in rock materials: experimental observations and numerical predictions, Sc. D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Bobet A (2000) The initiation of secondary cracks in compression. Eng Fract Mech 66:187–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan M (1986) Automatic two-dimensional multi-fracture propagation modeling of brittle solids with particular application to rock. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  • Dershowitz WS (1998) FracMan interactive discrete feature data analysis, geometric modeling and exploration simulation. User documentation.

  • Erdogan F, Sih GC (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Basic Eng 85:305–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerström M, Larsson R (2008) Approaches to dynamic fracture modelling at finite deformations. J Mech Phys Solids 56:613–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiechter S (2004) Defect formation energies and homogeneity ranges of rock salt-, pyrite, chalcopyrite-and molybdenite-type compound semiconductors. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 83(4):459–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao F, Chia KS, Krantz I, Nordin P (2006) Machin D (2006) On the application of the von Mises distribution and angular regression methods to investigate the seasonality of disease onset. Stat Med 25(9):1593–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves da Silva B (2009) Modeling of crack initiation, propagation and coalescence in rocks. S.M. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  • Gonçalves da Silva B, Einstein HH (2013) Modeling the crack propagation and coalescence in rocks. Int J Fract 182(2):167–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves da Silva B, Einstein HH (2014) Finite Element study of fracture initiation in flaws subject to internal fluid pressure and vertical stress. Int J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith AA (1921) The phenomenon of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans Ser A 221:163–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith AA (1924) The theory of rupture, Proc Ist Int Congr Appl Mech. 56–63.

  • Guo ZK, Kobayashi AS (1995) Dynamic mixed mode fracture of concrete. Int J Solids Struct 32:2591–2607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglis CE (1913) Stresses in a plate due to the presence of cracks and sharp comers. Inst Naval Archit London 55:219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraffea AR, Heuze FE (1980) Finite element models for rock fracture mechanics. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 4:25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson P, Stdhle P (2002) Prediction of shear crack growth direction under compressive loading and plane strain conditions. Int J Fract 113:175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanova VM, Sousa R, Murrihy B, Einstein HH (2014) Mathematical algorithm development and parametric studies with the GEOFRAC three-dimensional stochastic model of natural rock fracture systems. Comput Geosci 67:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi AS (1999) Hybrid method in elastic and elastoplastic fracture mechanics. Opt Lasers Eng 32:299–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Wathugala DN, Poulton M, Stephansson O (1990) Analysis of structural homogeneity of rock masses. Eng Geol 29(3):195–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Fiedler R, Panda BB (1997) Box fractal dimension as a measure of statistical homogeneity of jointed rock masses. Eng Geol 48(3–4):217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZL, Menouillard T, Belytschko T (2011) An XFEM/Spectral element method for dynamic crack propagation. Int J Fract 169:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV, Hughes G, Taylor CC (2008) Singh H (2008) A multivariate von mises distribution with applications to bioinformatics. Can J Stat 36(1):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan S (2015) An experimental and numerical study on the fracturing processes in Opalinus Shale. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  • Reyes O (1991) Experimental Study and Analytical Modeling of Compressive Fracture in Brittle Materials, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  • Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech. 379–386

  • Shen B, Stephansson O (1993) Numerical analysis of mixed mode I and mode II fracture propagation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 30(7):861–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih GC (1974) Strain-energy-density factory applied to mixed mode crack problems. Int J Fract 10(3):305–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83:1526–1535

  • Tester JWB, Anderson J, Batchelor AS, Blackwell DD, DiPippo R, Drake EM, Garnish J, Livesay B, Moore MC, Nichols K, Petty S, Toksoz MN, Veatch RW (2006) The future of geothermal energy: impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

  • Wong NY (2008) Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara marble. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

  • Wunsch C (2006) Discrete inverse and state estimation problems: with geophysical fluid applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vásárhelyi B, Bobet A (2000) Modeling of crack initiation, propagation and coalescence in uniaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 33(2):119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Yuan H (2011) Applications of normal stress dominated cohesive zone models for mixed-mode crack simulation based on the extended finite element methods. Eng Fract Mech 78:544–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C, Kobayashi A (1994) Fracture process zone associated with mixed mode fracture of SiCW/Al2O3. J Non-Cryst Solids 177:26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita L. Sousa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdulla, M., Sousa, R.L., Arzuaga, I. et al. FracProp: Stochastic Fracture Propagation Model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 2513–2531 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02377-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02377-3

Keywords

Navigation