Abstract
We propose Hausdorff distance as a 3D aperture metric for the rough-walled 3D rock fracture. To verify its plausibility, we construct a fracture model from a 3D scanned crystalline rock sample. Comparison with the commonly used vertical aperture reveals significant advantages in imaging of the possible aperture bottlenecks present in the fracture volume. Another advantage stems from the omnidirectional nature of the Hausdorff distance as opposed to the directional true aperture estimation techniques developed previously. Furthermore, we compute aperture distributions for non-sheared and sheared fracture models, highlighting the differences and similarities between both aperture metrics. A parallel can be drawn with the surface roughness estimation method proposed by Grasselli, which also operates on the surface mesh constructed from the 3D scan point cloud. Hausdorff distance is shown to perform best in the highly sloped regions, where the full dip of the mesh polygon becomes significant and vertical aperture inevitably overestimates the true geometric aperture of the fracture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown SR (1987) Fluid flow through rock joints: the effect of surface roughness. J Geophys Res 92:1337–1347. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB092iB02p01337
Cignoni P, Rocchini C, Scopigno R (1998) Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. Comput Graph Forum 17:167–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.00236
El-Soudani SM (1978) Profilometric analysis of fractures. Metallography 11:247–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0800(78)90045-9
Ge S (1997) A governing equation for fluid flow in rough fractures. Water Resour Res 33:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR02588
Koyama T, Li B, Jiang Y, Jing L (2008) Numerical simulations for the effects of the normal loading on particle transport in rock fractures during shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:1403–1419. https://doi.org/10.11187/ijjcrm.6.13
Mourzenko VV, Thovert J-F, Adler PM (1995) Permeability of a single fracture: validity of the reynolds equation. J Phys II Fr 5:465–482. https://doi.org/10.1051/jp2:1995133
Oron AP, Berkowitz B (1998) Flow in rock fractures: the local cubic law assumption reexamined. Water Resour Res 34:2811–2825. https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR02285
Patir N, Cheng HS (1978) An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication. J Lubr Technol 100:12–17. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3453103
Tatone B, Grasselli G (2009a) Use of a stereo-topometric measurement system for the characterization of rock joint roughness in-situ and in the laboratory. Rock engineering in difficult conditions. In: Proc. of 3rd Canada–US rock mechanics symposium. pp 1–14
Tatone B, Grasselli G (2009b) A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials. Rev Sci Instrum 80:125110. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266964
Tatone B, Grasselli G (2010) A new 2D discontinuity roughness parameter and its correlation with JRC. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1391–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.006
Zimmerman RW, Bodvarsson GS (1996) Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures. Transp Porous Media 23:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00145263
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Finenko, M., Konietzky, H. Hausdorff Distance as a 3D Fracture Aperture Metric. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 2355–2367 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02367-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02367-5