Skip to main content
Log in

Scaling of Fracture Patterns in Three Deep Boreholes and Implications for Constraining Fractal Discrete Fracture Network Models

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a methodology for generating fractal fracture networks in one, two and three dimensions that respects the dual power-law model, in which the scaling characteristics are set by the two independent parameters: (1) the correlation dimension that pertains to separation of fracture centers, and (2) the length exponent that governs the distribution of fracture lengths. Synthetic fracture distributions were generated to evaluate the stereological relationships between the scaling parameters of 2D and 3D networks, and the scaling of fracture intersection points along a scanline through the network. The results showed that it is not possible to estimate the 2D and 3D fractal scaling parameters of the correlation dimension from the 1D correlation dimension of fracture spacing from scanlines through the network, even if the length exponent is known a priori. Synthetic 1D distributions of fracture spacing of known correlation dimension were used as a benchmark to test the consistency of estimates of fractal dimension derived from box-counting, two-point correlation, and power-law fitting. The results showed that the correlation dimension obtained from the two-point correlation method provided the most stable and reliable estimate of the fractal dimension of fractures on 1D scanlines or boreholes. Application of the two-point correlation function to the observed fracture distributions along three deep boreholes in crystalline rock at Basel, Switzerland and Soultz-sous-Forêts, France showed that the distribution was fractal over more than two orders of magnitude in scale, and in all cases the fractal dimensions was in the range 0.86–0.88. Similar results were obtained for fracture sets of common orientation within the wells, although the fractal dimension ranged between 0.65 and 0.75. This constitutes strong evidence that fracturing in rock masses penetrated by the wells follows a fractal organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D :

Correlation dimension

a :

Fracture length exponent

r :

Distance between fracture centers (m)

l :

Fracture length (m)

C(r):

Correlation function

\({N_{\text{p}}}\left( r \right)\) :

Number of pairs of fractures whose center-to-center distance is less than r

\({N_{\text{t}}}\) :

Total number of fractures

L :

Domain length in 1D, 2D and 3D (m)

m :

Number of equal-sized sub-domains in a Multiplicative Cascade process

\({l_{{\text{min}}}}\) :

Minimum fracture length (m) in DFN generation

\({l_{{\text{ratio}}}}\) :

The ratio of sub-domain side length to the domain side length in Multiplicative Cascade process

P :

Probability of having a fracture in a sub-domain in Multiplicative Cascade process

U :

Fracture assignment vector

CumP:

Cumulative probability density vector

t :

Ruler length in 1D box-counting technique

\({N_{\text{b}}}(t)\) :

Number of rulers of length t containing at least one fracture

D b :

Box-dimension

s :

Fracture spacing

\({N_{\text{s}}}\) :

Number of spacings greater than or equal to a specific spacing s

D s :

Power-law exponent of fracture spacing

κ :

Fischer coefficient

References

  • Afshari Moein MJ (2018) Linkage between fracture network, stress heterogeneities and induced seismicity in deep geothermal reservoirs (Doctoral Dissertation). Zurich: ETH Zurich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000294223

  • Afshari Moein MJ, Somogyvári M, Valley B, Jalali M, Loew S, Bayer P (2018a) Fracture network characterization using stress-based tomography. J Geophys Res Solid Earth,123. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016438

  • Afshari Moein MJ, Tormann T, Valley B, Wiemer S (2018b) Maximum magnitude forecast in hydraulic stimulation based on clustering and size distribution of early microseismicity. Geophys Res Lett 45:6907–6917. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alghalandis YF, Dowd PA, Xu C (2013) The RANSAC method for generating fracture networks from micro-seismic event data. Math Geosci 45:207–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alghalandis YF, Dowd PA, Xu C (2015) connectivity field: a measure for characterising fracture networks. Math Geosci 47:63–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-014-9520-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allegre CJ, Lemouel JL, Provost A (1982) Scaling rules in rock fracture and possible implications for earthquake prediction. Nature 297:47–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/297047a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baecher GB, Lanney NA (1978) Trace length biases in joint surveys. In: Proceedings of the 19th U. S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, vol 1, pp 56–65

  • Baghbanan A, Jing LR (2007) Hydraulic properties of fractured rock masses with correlated fracture length and aperture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:704–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bak P, Tang C, Wiesenfeld K (1988) Self-organized criticality. Phys Rev A Gen Phys 38:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton CC (1995) Fractal analysis of scaling and spatial clustering of fractures. Fractals in the earth sciences. Springer, Berlin, pp 141–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton CA, Zoback MD (1992) Self-similar distribution and properties of macroscopic fractures at depth in crystalline rock in the Cajon Pass Scientific Drill Hole. J Geophys Res Solid Earth (1978–2012) 97:5181–5200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Hadad A (1997) Fractal and multifractal measures of natural and synthetic fracture networks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth (1978–2012) 102(B6):12205–12218. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB00304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadu FK, Long LT (1994) The fractal character of fracture spacing and RQD. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 31(2):127 ± 134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet E, Bour O, Odling NE, Davy P, Main I, Cowie P, Berkowitz B (2001) Scaling of fracture systems in geological media. Rev Geophys 39:347–383. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bour O, Davy P (1997) Connectivity of random fault networks following a power law fault length distribution. Water Resour Res 33:1567–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bour O, Davy P (1999) Clustering and size distributions of fault patterns: Theory and measurements. Geophys Res Lett 26(13):2001–2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bour O, Davy P, Darcel C, Odling N (2002) A statistical scaling model for fracture network geometry, with validation on a multiscale mapping of a joint network (Hornelen Basin, Norway). J Geophys Res Solid Earth 107

  • Chilès J (1988) Fractal and geostatistical methods for modeling of a fracture network. Math Geol 20:631–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemo T, Smith L (1997) A hierarchical model for solute transport in fractured media. Water Resour Res 33:1763–1783. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie P, Knipe R, Main I (1996) Scaling laws for fault and fracture populations-Analyses and applications-Introduction. J Struct Geol 18:R5–R11

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcel C (2002) Corrélations dans les réseaux de fractures: caractérisation et conséquences sur les propriétés hydrauliques. Doctoral Dissertation. Université Rennes 1. Rennes

  • Darcel C, Bour O, Davy P (2003a) Cross-correlation between length and position in real fracture networks. Geophys Res Lett 30(12):1650. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darcel C, Bour O, Davy P (2003b) Stereological analysis of fractal fracture networks. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002091

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcel C, Bour O, Davy P, De Dreuzy JR (2003c) Connectivity properties of two-dimensional fracture networks with stochastic fractal correlation. Water Resour Res 39(10)

  • Davy P (1993) On the frequency-length distribution of the San Andreas fault system. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 98:12141–12151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davy P, Sornette A, Sornette D (1990) Some consequences of a proposed fractal nature of continental faulting. Nature 348:56–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davy, Le Goc R, Darcel C, Bour O, De Dreuzy J-R, Munier R (2010) A likely universal model of fracture scaling and its consequence for crustal hydromechanics. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 115

  • Davy P, Darcel C, Le Goc R, Munier R, Selroos JO, Ivars MD (2018) DFN, why, how and what for, concepts, theories and issues. In: 2nd international discrete fracture network engineering conference. American Rock Mechanics Association

  • Day-Lewis AD (2008) Characterization and modeling of in situ stress heterogeneity. (PhD thesis), Stanford University, California, USA

  • de Dreuzy J-R, Davy P, Bour O (2001) Hydraulic properties of two-dimensional random fracture networks following a power law length distribution: 1. Effective connectivity. Water Resour Res 37:2065–2078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Dreuzy JR, Davy P, Bour O (2002) Hydraulic properties of two-dimensional random fracture networks following power law distributions of length and aperture. Water Resour Res 38

  • Deere DU, Deere DW (1988) The rock quality designation (RQD) index in practice. In: Kirakaldie L (ed) Rock classification systems for engineering purposes. ASTM special publication 984. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, pp 91–101

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dershowitz WS, Einstein HH (1988) Characterizing rock joint geometry with joint system models. Rock Mech Rock Eng 21:21–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01019674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dershowitz W, Lee G, Geier J, Hitchcock S, La Pointe P (1993) FracMan user documentation. Golder Associates Inc, Seattle

    Google Scholar 

  • Dezayes C, Genter A, Valley B (2010) Structure of the low permeable naturally fractured geothermal reservoir at Soultz. CR Geosci 342(7–8):517–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dèzes P, Schmid SM, Ziegler PA (2004) Evolution of the European Cenozoic Rift System: interaction of the Alpine and Pyrenean orogens with their foreland lithosphere. Tectonophysics 389(1–2):1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc R Soc Lond A 241(1226):376–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KF (2005) Permeability creation and damage due to massive fluid injections into granite at 3.5 km at Soultz: 2. Critical stress and fracture strength. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 110:B4

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans KF, Genter A, Sausse J (2005) Permeability creation and damage due to massive fluid injections into granite at 3.5 km at Soultz: 1. Borehole observations. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 110:B4

    Google Scholar 

  • Genter A, Evans KF, Cuenot N, Fritsch D, Sanjuan B (2010) Contribution of the exploration of deep crystalline fractured reservoir of Soultz to the knowledge of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). CR Geosci 342:502–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2010.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie P, Howard C, Walsh J, Watterson J (1993) Measurement and characterisation of spatial distributions of fractures. Tectonophysics 226:113–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häring MO, Schanz U, Ladner F, Dyer BC (2008) Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics 37(5):469–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harthong B, Scholtès L, Donzé F-V (2012) Strength characterization of rock masses, using a coupled DEM–DFN model. Geophys J Int 191:467–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel H, Procaccia I (1983) The infinite number of generalized dimensions of fractals and strange attractors. Physica D 8:435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirata T, Satoh T, Ito K (1987) Fractal structure of spatial distribution of microfracturing in rock. Geophys J Int 90:369–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1987.tb00732.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TH (2007) Fracture characterization and estimation of fracture porosity of naturally fractured reservoirs with no matrix porosity using stochastic fractal models. PhD Thesis. Texas A&M University, Texas

  • La Pointe P (1988) A method to characterize fracture density and connectivity through fractal geometry. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech, vol 6. Elsevier, pp 421–429

  • Ledésert B, Dubois J, Genter A, Meunier A (1993) Fractal analysis of fractures applied to Soultz-sous-Forêts hot dry rock geothermal program. J Volcanol Geoth Res 57:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei LQ, Gao K (2018) Correlation between fracture network properties and stress variability in geological media. Geophys Res Lett 45(9):3994–4006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei Q, Latham JP, Tsang CF, Xiang J, Lang P (2015) A new approach to upscaling fracture network models while preserving geostatistical and geomechanical characteristics. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:4784–4807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei Q, Latham JP, Tsang CF (2017) The use of discrete fracture networks for modelling coupled geomechanical and hydrological behaviour of fractured rocks. Comput Geotech 85:151–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy S, Schertzer D (1986) Scale invariance, symmetries, fractals, and stochastic simulations of atmospheric phenomena. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 67:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning CE (1994) Fractal clustering of metamorphic veins. Geology 22:335–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meakin P (1991) Fractal aggregates in geophysics. Rev Geophys 29:317–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merceron T, Velde B (1991) Application of Cantor’s method for fractal analysis of fractures in the Toyoha Mine, Hokkaido, Japan. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 96:16641–16650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moein MJA, Valley B, Ziegler M (2016) Preliminary fractal analysis of fracture spacing inferred from an acoustic televiewer log run in the Basel-1 geothermal well (Switzerland). Rock mechanics and rock engineering: from the past to the future. CRC Press, London, pp 103–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller J, Waagepetersen RP (2003) Statistical inference and simulation for spatial point processes. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, vol 100. Chapman and Hall, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling (1992) Network properties of a two-dimensional natural fracture pattern. Pure Appl Geophys 138:95–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odling NE, Gillespie P, Bourgine B, Castaing C, Chiles JP, Christensen NP, Fillion E, Genter A, Olsen C, Thrane L, Trice R (1999) Variations in fracture system geometry and their implications for fluid flow in fractured hydrocarbon reservoirs. Pet Geosci 5:373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard D, Segall P (1987) Theoretical displacements and stresses near fractures in rock: with applications to faults, joints, veins, dikes, and solution surfaces. Fract Mech Rock 277:277–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power WL, Tullis TE (1991) Euclidean and fractal models for the description of rock surface roughness. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 96:415–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw CE (1999) Connectivity of joint networks with power law length distributions. Water Resour Res 35:2661–2670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy A, Perfect E, Dunne WM, McKay LD (2014) A technique for revealing scale-dependent patterns in fracture spacing data. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 119:5979–5986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz CH (2002) The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sornette D (2006) Critical phenomena in natural sciences: chaos, fractals, selforganization and disorder: concepts and tools. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sornette D, Davy P, Sornette A (1990) Structuration of the lithosphere in plate tectonics as a self-organized critical phenomenon. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 95:17353–17361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spyropoulos C, Scholz CH, Shaw BE (2002) Transition regimes for growing crack populations. Phys Rev E 65:056105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valley B (2007) The relation between natural fracturing and stress heterogeneities in deep-seated crystalline rocks at Soultz-sous-Forêts (France). Doctoral Dissertation. ETH Zürich, Zürich

  • Valley B, Evans K (2014) Preliminary assessment of the scaling relationships of in-situ stress orientation variations indicated by wellbore failure data. In: The 2014 ISRM European Rock Mechanics Symposium (EUROCK 2014). rock engineering and rock mechanics: structure in and on rock masses. CRC Press, Vigo, pp 463–468

  • Valley B, Dezayes C, Genter A (2007) Multiscale fracturing in the Soultz-sous-Forêts basement from borehole image analyses. In: Proceedings EHDRA scientific conference, 28. Soultz-sous-Forêts, France

  • Valley B, Jalali MR, Ziegler M, Evans KF (2014) Constraining DFN characteristics for deep geothermal projects by considering the effects of fractures on stress variability. In: International discrete fracture network engineering conference DFNE 2014. Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Velde B, Dubois J, Touchard G, Badri A (1990) Fractal analysis of fractures in rocks: the Cantor’s Dust method. Tectonophysics 179:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verscheure M, Fourno A, Chilès J-P (2012) Joint inversion of fracture model properties for CO2 storage monitoring or oil recovery history matching. Oil Gas Sci Technol Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles 67:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe K, Takahashi H (1993) Fractal characterization of subsurface fracture network for geothermal energy extraction system. In: Proceedings, eighteenth workshop on geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Report No. SGP-TR-145-17

  • Ziegler M, Valley B, Evans F (2015) Characterisation of nature fractures and fracture zones of the Basel EGS reservoir inferred from geophysical logging of the Basel-1 well. In: Proceedings world geothermal congress 2015, Melbourne, Australia

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program under Grant agreement no. 608553 (Project IMAGE). We would like thank Simon Löw for his continuous support and constructive comments during this project. We are also thankful to the anonymous reviewers, associate editor and the editor for their valuable suggestions that led to improvements of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Javad Afshari Moein.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afshari Moein, M.J., Valley, B. & Evans, K.F. Scaling of Fracture Patterns in Three Deep Boreholes and Implications for Constraining Fractal Discrete Fracture Network Models. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52, 1723–1743 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-1739-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-1739-7

Keywords

Navigation