Skip to main content
Log in

Cavity Expansion in Rock Masses Obeying the “Hoek–Brown” Failure Criterion

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An unified approach is presented for the analysis of the expansion of both cylindrical and spherical cavities in an infinite elastic–perfectly plastic “Hoek–Brown” (H–B) material. The H–B failure criterion expressed in scaled form is adopted with a plastic flow rule characterized by a constant dilatancy angle \(\psi\). Closed form expressions are given for the extent of the plastic region and the related stress. Solutions of the displacement field in the plastic region are provided based on both small-strain and large-strain theories. An original relationship between the cavity pressure and its expansion is derived. The developed closed-form solutions are validated employing the finite element method. For comparison purposes, an approximate solution is presented by neglecting the elastic strains in the plastic region which reveals that the assumption of no elastic strains does not influence the results for strong rocks in contrast with weak rocks. For practical purposes, design charts are provided allowing easy and accurate estimates of the limit pressure for cavity expansion in rock masses. The cavity expansion solution is finally validated against results obtained using the Finite Element modelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(r_{i}\) :

Instant cavity radius

\(r_{i0}\) :

Original cavity radius

\(r\) :

Radial coordinate

\(r_{p}\) :

Plastic radius

\(u\) :

Radial displacement

\(u_{\text{EPB}}\) :

Radial displacement at the elastic plastic boundary

\(P_{i}\) :

Internal cavity pressure

\(P_{y}\) :

Yield pressure

\(P_{0}\) :

Far field pressure

\(P_{ \lim }\) :

Limit pressure

\({\text{GSI}}\) :

Geological strength index of the rock

\(m_{i}\) :

Strength parameter of the intact rock

\(D\) :

Disturbance factor of the rock

\(s, a, m_{b}\) :

Hoek–Brown-derived parameters

\(E_{i}\) :

Deformation modulus of the intact rock

\(E_{rm}\) :

Deformation modulus of the rock

\(G\) :

Shear modulus

\(I_{r}\) :

Rigidity index

\(\varepsilon_{r}^{e}\) :

Elastic radial strain

\(\varepsilon_{\theta }^{e}\) :

Elastic circumferential strain

\(\varepsilon_{r}^{p}\) :

Plastic radial strain

\(\varepsilon_{\theta }^{p}\) :

Plastic circumferential strain

\(\sigma^{\prime}_{1}\) :

Major principal stress

\(\sigma^{\prime}_{3}\) :

Minor principal stress

\(\sigma_{r}\) :

Radial stress

\(\sigma_{\theta }\) :

Circumferential stress

\(\sigma_{ci}\) :

Uniaxial compressive stress of the intact rock

\(\sigma_{c}\) :

Uniaxial compressive strength

\(\sigma_{t}\) :

Uniaxial tensile stress of the intact rock

\(\nu\) :

Poison ratio

\(\psi\) :

Dilatancy angle of the rock mass

\(\omega\) :

Dilatancy coefficient

References

  • Brown Edwin T, Bray John W, Ladanyi Branko, Hoek Evert (1983) Ground response curves for rock tunnels. J Geotechn Eng 109(1):15–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burd HJ, Houlsby GT (1990) Finite element analysis of two cylindrical expansion problems involving nearly incompressible material behaviour. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 14(5):351–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza-Torres C (2004) Elasto-plastic solution of tunnel problems using the generalized form of the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza-Torres C, Fairhurst C (1999) The elasto-plastic response of underground excavations in rock masses that satisfy the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(6):777–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick P (1959) The quasi-static expansion of a spherical cavity in metals and ideal soils. Q J Mech Appl Mech 12(1):52–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RE, Anderson WF (1961) In situ measurement of soil properties with the pressuremeter. Civil Eng Public Works Rev 56(658):615–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdi S (2016) Pipe pile driving into rock. UCLouvain

  • Hoek E (2006) Practical-rock-engineering

  • Hoek E, Brown E (1980) Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 106(GT9):1013–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ETT (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Diederichs MS (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(2):203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek Evert, Carranza Carlos, Corkum Brent (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion—2002 Edition. Narms-Tac 1:267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Londe Pierre (1988) Discussion of ‘determination of the shear failure envelope in rock masses’ by Roberto Ucar (March, 1986, Vol. 112, No. 3). J Geotech Eng 114(3):374–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph MF, Wroth CP (1979) An analytical solution for the consolidation around a driven pile. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 3(3):217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojat Fabrice, Labiouse Vincent, Mestat Philippe (2015) Improved analytical solutions for the response of underground excavations in rock masses satisfying the generalized Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 79:193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado R, Mitchell JK, Jamiolkowski M (1997) Cavity expansion and penetration resistance in sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(4):344–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano A, Olalla C, Reig I (2011) Convergence of circular tunnels in elastoplastic rock masses with non-linear failure criteria and non-associated flow laws. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(6):878–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharan SK (2003) Elastic–Brittle–Plastic analysis of circular openings in Hoek–Brown media. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(6):817–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharan SK (2005) Exact and Approximate Solutions for Displacements around Circular Openings in Elastic–Brittle–Plastic Hoek-Brown Rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42(4):542–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharan SK (2008) Analytical Solutions for Stresses and Displacements around a Circular Opening in a Generalized Hoek-Brown Rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(1):78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suryasentana SK, Lehane BM (2014) Numerical derivation of CPT-based p–y curves for piles in sand. Géotechnique 64(3):186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki Y, Lehane BM (2015) Analysis of CPT end resistance at variable penetration rates using the spherical cavity expansion method in normally consolidated soils. Comput Geotech 69(69):141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vásárhelyi B (2009) A possible method for estimating the Poisson’s rate values of the rock masses. Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica 44(3):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesic AS (1973) Expansion of cavities in infinite soil mass (closure). J Soil Mech Found Div 99(sm5):409

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Yarlong (1996) Ground response of circular tunnel in poorly consolidated rock. J Geotech Eng 122(9):703–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X (2007) Investigation of the end bearing performance of displacement piles in sand. The University of Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Lehane BM (2008) Pile and penetrometer end bearing resistance in two-layered soil profiles. Géotechnique 58(3):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasufuku N, Hyde AFL (1995) Pile end-bearing capacity in crushable sands. Géotechnique 45(4):663–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ypma Tjalling J (1995) Historical development of the newton-raphson method. SIAM Rev 37(4):531–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu HS (2000) Elastic-perfectly plastic solutions. Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 32–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haythem Gharsallaoui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gharsallaoui, H., Jafari, M. & Holeyman, A. Cavity Expansion in Rock Masses Obeying the “Hoek–Brown” Failure Criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53, 927–941 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01920-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01920-7

Keywords

Navigation