Skip to main content
Log in

A New Contact Formulation for Large Frictional Sliding and Its Implement in the Explicit Numerical Manifold Method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modelling discontinuous systems involving large frictional sliding is one of the key requirements for numerical methods in geotechnical engineering. The contact algorithms for most numerical methods in geotechnical engineering is based on the judgement of contact types and the satisfaction of contact conditions by the open–close iteration, in which penalty springs between contacting bodies are added or removed repeatedly. However, the simulations involving large frictional sliding contact are not always convergent, particularly in the cases that contain a large number of contacts. To avoid the judgement of contact types and the open–close iteration, a new contact algorithm, in which the contact force is calculated directly based on the overlapped area of bodies in contact and the contact states, is proposed and implemented in the explicit numerical manifold method (NMM). Stemming from the discretization of Kuhn–Tucker conditions for contact, the equations for calculating contact force are derived and the contributions of contact force to the global iteration equation of explicit NMM are obtained. The new contact algorithm can also be implemented in other numerical methods (FEM, DEM, DDA, etc.) as well. Finally, five numerical examples are investigated to verify the proposed method and illustrate its capability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\({\varvec{\upsigma}}\text{, }\widehat{{\varvec{\upsigma}}}\) :

Cauchy stress and its corotational form

\({\dot{\mathbf{\varepsilon }}},\;\widehat{{{\dot{\mathbf{\varepsilon }}}}}\) :

Rate of deformation and its corotational form

b :

Body force vector

\({\mathbf{u}},{\dot{\mathbf{u}}},{\mathbf{\ddot{u}}}\) :

Displacement, velocity and acceleration vectors

D :

Constitutive equation

R :

Rotation matrix

\({\mathbf{t}}_{\text{c}}^{\left( i \right)}\) :

Contact traction between two bodies

\({\mathbf{p}}_{k}^{\left( i \right)} ,{\mathbf{p}}_{k,j}^{\left( i \right)}\) :

Normal contact force acted on the segment \(c_{k}^{\left( i \right)}\) or sub-segment \(c_{k,j}^{\left( i \right)}\)

\({\mathbf{P}}_{k}^{\left( i \right)} ,{\mathbf{P}}_{k,j}^{\left( i \right)} ,{\mathbf{x}}_{k}^{\left( i \right)} ,{\mathbf{x}}_{k,j}^{\left( i \right)}\) :

Equivalent normal point load of \({\mathbf{p}}_{k}^{\left( i \right)} ,{\mathbf{p}}_{k,j}^{\left( i \right)}\) and their point of force application

\({\mathbf{t}}_{k}^{\left( i \right)} ,{\mathbf{t}}_{k,j}^{\left( i \right)}\) :

Tangential contact force acted on the segment \(c_{k}^{\left( i \right)}\) or sub-segment \(c_{k,j}^{\left( i \right)}\)

\({\mathbf{n}}_{\text{c}}\) :

Equivalent normal direction \({\mathbf{n}}_{\text{c}}\) of the overlapped contact area

M :

Mass matrix

\({\mathbf{f}}_{\text{int}} ,{\mathbf{f}}_{\text{ext}} ,{\mathbf{f}}_{\lambda } ,{\mathbf{f}}_{c}\) :

Internal nodal force, external nodal force, boundary constraint nodal force and contact nodal forces

\(\rho\) :

Density of material

\(g_{\text{N}}\) :

Penetration of two contact bodies

\(p_{N} ,t_{T}\) :

Normal and tangential components of \({\mathbf{t}}_{\text{c}}^{\left( i \right)}\)

\(\alpha_{\text{N}} ,\alpha_{\text{T}}\) :

Normal and tangential penalty coefficient

M I :

Mathematical cover (MC) patch I

P i :

Physical cover (PC) patch i

\(w_{i}\) :

Weight function of PC patch Pi

\(c_{k}^{\left( i \right)}\) :

Contact segment k of body i

\(c_{k,j}^{\left( i \right)}\) :

Sub segment j of \(c_{k}^{\left( i \right)}\)

References

  • An XM, Li LX, Ma GW et al (2011) Prediction of rank deficiency in partition of unity-based methods with plane triangular or quadrilateral meshes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(5):665–674

    Google Scholar 

  • An X, Ning Y, Ma G et al (2014) Modeling progressive failures in rock slopes with non-persistent joints using the numerical manifold method. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 38(7):679–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao HR, Zhao Z (2010) An alternative scheme for the corner-corner contact in the two-dimensional discontinuous deformation analysis. Adv Eng Softw 41(2):206–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao H, Zhao Z, Tian Q (2014) On the Implementation of augmented Lagrangian method in the two-dimensional discontinuous deformation analysis. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 38(6):551–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Beskos DE (1987) Boundary element methods in dynamic analysis. Appl Mech Rev 40(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Beskos DE (1997) Boundary element methods in dynamic analysis: part II (1986–1996). Appl Mech Rev 50(3):149–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y, He T, Wang R (2000) Numerical simulation of dynamic process of the Tangshan earthquake by a new method—LDDA/microscopic and macroscopic simulation: towards predictive modelling of the earthquake process. Birkhäuser Basel 157:2083–2104

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen N, Kemeny J, Jiang QH, Pan ZW (2017) Automatic extraction of blocks from 3D point clouds of fractured rock. Comput Geosci 109:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Cundall P (1971) A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movement in block rock systems. Proc Int Symposium. Fracture, ISRM, Nancy. 11-8, pp 129–136

  • Doolin DM, Sitar N (2004) Time integration in discontinuous deformation analysis. J Eng Mech 130(3):249–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan H, Zheng H, He S (2016) S-R decomposition based numerical manifold method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 304:452–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemzadeh H, Ramezanpour MA, Bodaghpour S (2015) Dynamic high order numerical manifold method based on weighted residual method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 100(8):596–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli G, Lisjak A, Mahabadi OK et al (2015) Influence of pre-existing discontinuities and bedding planes on hydraulic fracturing initiation. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 19(5):580–597

    Google Scholar 

  • He L, Ma GW (2010) Development of 3D numerical manifold method. Int J Comput Methods 7(01):107–129

    Google Scholar 

  • He J, Liu Q, Wu Z et al (2017) Modelling transient heat conduction of granular materials by numerical manifold method. Eng Anal Bound Elem 86:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu M, Wang Y, Rutqvist J (2015) An effective approach for modeling fluid flow in heterogeneous media using numerical manifold method. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 77(8):459–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Itasca Consulting Group Inc (2013) UDEC (Universal Distinct Element Code). Itasca Consulting Group Inc., Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang W, Zheng H (2011) Discontinuous deformation analysis based on variational inequality theory. Int J Comput Methods 8(02):193–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang QH, Zhou CB (2017) A rigorous solution for the stability of polyhedral rock blocks. Comput Geotech 90:190–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang QH, Deng SS, Zhou CB et al (2010) Modeling unconfined seepage flow using three-dimensional numerical manifold method. J Hydrodyn 22(4):554–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing L (2003) A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modelling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(3):283–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisjak A, Grasselli G (2014) A review of discrete modeling techniques for fracturing processes in discontinuous rock masses. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6(4):301–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisjak A, Tatone BSA, Mahabadi OK et al (2016) Hybrid finite–discrete element simulation of the EDZ formation and mechanical sealing process around a microtunnel in opalinus clay. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(5):1849–1873

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclaughlin MM (1997) Kinematics and discontinuous deformation analysis of landslide movement. Panamerican Symposium on Landslides

  • Munjiza A (2004) The combined finite–discrete element method. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning YJ, An XM, Ma GW (2011) Footwall slope stability analysis with the numerical manifold method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(6):964–975

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrone N, Kao R (1975) A general finite difference method for arbitrary meshes. Comput Struct 5(1):45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp A, Gee MW, Wall WA (2010) A finite deformation mortar contact formulation using a primal–dual active set strategy. Int J Numer Meth Eng 79(11):1354–1391

    Google Scholar 

  • Rougier E, Knight EE, Broome ST et al (2014) Validation of a three-dimensional finite–discrete element method using experimental results of the split Hopkinson pressure bar test. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70(9):101–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi GH (1988) Discontinuous deformation analysis: a new numerical model for the statics and dynamics of block systems. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA

  • Shi GH (1992a) Manifold method of material analysis. In: Transactions of the Ninth Army Conference on Applied Mathematics and Computing, DTIC Document: Minneapolis, pp 51–76

  • Shi GH (1992b) Modeling rock joints and blocks by manifold method. In: Rock Mechanics Proceedings of the 33rd US Symposium, New Mexico, Santa Fe, pp 639–648

  • Shi GH (1997) Manifold method of material analysis. Transactions of the 9th Army Conf. on Applied Mathematics and Computing, Rep. No. 92-1, US Army Research Office, Minneapolis, MN, pp 57–76

  • Shi GH (2015) Contact theory. Sci China Technol Sci 58(9):1450–1496

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian R, Wen L (2015) Improved XFEM—an extra-doffree, well-conditioning, and interpolating XFEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 285(3):639–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsesarsky M, Hatzor YH (2006) Tunnel roof deflection in blocky rock masses as a function of joint spacing and friction—a parametric study using discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA). Tunnell Undergr Space Technol Inc Trenchless Technol Res 21(1):29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei W, Jiang Q (2017) A modified numerical manifold method for simulation of finite deformation problem. Appl Math Model 48:673–887

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei W, Jiang QH, Peng J (2017) New rock bolt model and numerical implementation in numerical manifold method. Int J Geomech 17(5):E4016004

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei W, Zhao Q, Jiang Q et al (2018) Three new boundary conditions for the seismic response analysis of geomechanics problems using the numerical manifold method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 105:110–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong LNY, Wu Z (2014) Application of the numerical manifold method to model progressive failure in rock slopes. Eng Fract Mech 119(3):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan C, Zheng H (2016) Three-dimensional hydromechanical model of hydraulic fracturing with arbitrarily discrete fracture networks using finite–discrete element method. Int J Geomech 17(6):04016133

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan C, Zheng H, Sun G et al (2016) Combined finite–discrete element method for simulation of hydraulic fracturing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(4):1389–1410

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Zheng H (2016) Direct approach to treatment of contact in numerical manifold method. Int J Geomech 17(5):E4016012

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HH, Han SY, Fan LF et al (2018) The numerical manifold method for 2D transient heat conduction problems in functionally graded materials. Eng Anal Bound Elem 88:145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Jiang W (2009) Discontinuous deformation analysis based on complementary theory. Sci China 52(9):2547–2554

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Li X (2015) Mixed linear complementarity formulation of discontinuous deformation analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 75:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng W, Zhuang X, Tannant DD et al (2014) Unified continuum/discontinuum modeling framework for slope stability assessment. Eng Geol 179:90–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Zhang P, Du X (2016) Dual form of discontinuous deformation analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 305:196–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (2000) The finite element method, 5th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work reported in this paper has received financial support from National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC1505005), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2042018kf0028), and Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No. 2016CFA083). These supports are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinghui Jiang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, W., Zhao, Q., Jiang, Q. et al. A New Contact Formulation for Large Frictional Sliding and Its Implement in the Explicit Numerical Manifold Method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53, 435–451 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01914-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01914-5

Keywords

Navigation