Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanisms of Rockburst Triggered by Slip and Fracture of Coal–Parting–Coal Structure Discontinuities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The existence of parting in coal can contribute to unstable slip and shear failure, and even rockburst of mining faces and sidewalls. In this work, the rockburst triggered by the slip and fracture of coal–parting–coal structure (CPCS) discontinuities subjected to dynamic stress was visually investigated by numerical simulation, and the stress and displacement as well as the corresponding vibration characteristics surrounding the parting during the rockburst were comprehensively analyzed. Eventually, the rockburst triggering mechanism was summarized. As a field testimony for verifying the numerical results, the “11.20” rockburst in the first parting zone of the 1307 working face of the Zhaolou coal mine (ZCM) was investigated in detail by microseismic (MS) tomography. The following main conclusions were obtained: (1) rockburst may be triggered by the slip and fracture of a CPCS subjected to dynamic stress with a violent ejection of a large number of parting fragments at a high speed. The peak particle velocity (PPV) 10 m/s can be regarded as a critical vibration velocity for rockburst warning; (2) during rockburst, the vibration characteristics of different positions surrounding the parting are closely associated with the coal and rock failure caused by the slip and fracture of the parting; and (3) based on the clustering of many high-energy MS sources in the parting zone combined with a high P-wave velocity, velocity gradient, stress concentration and strain energy, it was fully verified that the “11.20” rockburst was triggered by the slip and fracture of the wedge-shaped parting. Additionally, the sudden and sharp rise of the fault total area (FTA) can be regarded as a precursory sign to warn rockburst. The in situ observations lend credence to the numerical simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(\Delta {\sigma _{\text{n}}}\) :

The normal effective stress increment

σ 1 :

The maximum principal stress

τ max :

The shear strength of contact

\({\tau _{\text{s}}}\) :

The shear stress

\(\phi\) :

The friction angle

k n :

The normal stiffness

\({k_{\text{s}}}\) :

The tangential stiffness

\(C\) :

The cohesion

G :

The shear modulus

K :

The bulk modulus

\(\Delta {u_{\text{n}}}\) :

The normal displacement increment

u s :

The tangential displacement

References

  • Bandopadhyay C, Sheorey PR, Singh B, Ghose AK (1988) Stability of parting rock between level contiguous coal pillar workings. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 25:307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (1976) The shear strength of rock and rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 13:255–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewick RP, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF (2014) Shear rupture under constant normal stiffness boundary conditions. Tectonophysics 634:76–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das AJ, Mandal PK, Bhattacharjee R, Tiwari S, Kushwaha A, Roy LB (2017) Evaluation of stability of underground workings for exploitation of an inclined coal seam by the ubiquitous joint model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 93:101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deb D, Das KC (2014) A new doubly enriched finite element for modelling grouted bolt crossed by rock joint. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 70:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama E, Xu S, Yamashita F, Mizoguchi K (2016) Cohesive zone length of metagabbro at supershear rupture velocity. J Seismol 20:1207–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazvinian AH, Azinfar MJ, Geranmayeh Vaneghi R (2012) Importance of tensile strength on the shear behavior of discontinuities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goebel THW, Schorlemmer D, Becker TW, Dresen G, Sammis CG (2013) Acoustic emissions document stress changes over many seismic cycles in stick-slip experiments. Geophys Res Lett 40:2049–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong WL, Peng YY, He MC, Wang J (2015) Thermal image and spectral characterization of roadway failure process in geologically 45°inclined rocks. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 49:156–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli G (2006) Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Rock Mech Rock Eng 39:295–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenoble A, Haycocks C (1985) Design factors in near seam interactions. In: 3dth Conference on Ground Control Mining, W. Virginia University. Morgantown, pp 166–177

  • Gu R, Ozbay U (2014) Distinct element analysis of unstable shear failure of rock discontinuities in underground mining conditions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 68:44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu R, Ozbay U (2015) Numerical investigation of unstable rock failure in underground mining condition. Comput Geotech 63:171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haycocks C, Karmis M, Ehgartner B (1982) Multiple seam mine design. State-of-the-art of ground control in longwall mining and mining subsidence. SME, New York, pp 59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat A, Pyrak NLJ, Bobet A (2014a) Precursors to the shear failure of rock discontinuities. Geophys Res Lett 41:5467–5475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedayat A, Pyrak-Nolte LJ, Bobet A (2014b) Precursors to the shear failure of rock discontinuities. Geophys Res Lett 41:5467–5475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazaei C, Hazzard J, Chalaturnyk R (2016) A discrete element model to link the microseismic energies recorded in caprock to geomechanics. Acta Geotech 11:1351–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake P, Shou G, Huang T, Morgan R (1995) New peak shear strength criteria for anisotropic rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32:673–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladanyi B, Archambault G (1969) Simulation of the shear behavior of a jointed rock mass. In: Proceedings of the 11th US symposium on rock mechanics. Berkeley, p 105–125

  • Li XM, Wang ZH, Zhang JW (2017) Stability of roof structure and its control in steeply inclined coal seams. Int J Min Sci Tech 27:359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Wang EY, Song DZ, Wang SH, Niu Y (2015) Effect of rock strength on failure mode and mechanical behavior of composite samples. Arab J Geosci 8:4527–4539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matcharashvili T, Chelidze T, Zhukova N, Mepharidze E (2011) Investigation of acoustic emission accompanying stick-slip movement of rock samples at different stiffnesses of spring–block system. Tribol Int 44:811–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaskey GC, Lockner DA (2016) Calibrated acoustic emission system records M -3.5 to M -8 events generated on a saw-cut granite sample. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4527–4536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrishal S, Sharifzadeh M, Shahriar K, Song JJ (2016) An experimental study on normal stress and shear rate dependency of basic friction coefficient in dry and wet limestone joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:4607–4629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng FZ, Zhou H, Wang ZQ, Zhang LM, Kong L, Li SJ, Zhang CQ (2016) Experimental study on the prediction of rockburst hazards induced by dynamic structural plane shearing in deeply buried hard rock tunnels. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 86:210–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naoi M, Nakatani M, Kgarume T et al (2015) Quasi-static slip patch growth to 20 m on a geological fault inferred from acoustic emissions in a South African gold mine. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:1692–1707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JW, Lee YK, Song JJ, Choi BH (2013) A constitutive model for shear behavior of rock joints based on three-dimensional quantification of joint roughness. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:1513–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng SS, Chandra U (1980) Getting the most from multiple seam reserves. Coal Min Process 17:78–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Petukhov IM, Linkov AM (1979) The theory of post failure deformations and the problem of stability in rock mechanics. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves MJ (1985) Rock surface roughness and frictional strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22:429–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder JA (1988) Excess shear stress in the assessment of geologically hazardous situations. J S Afr I Min Metall 88:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvadurai PA, Glaser SD (2015) Laboratory-developed contact models controlling instability on frictional faults. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 120:4208–4236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifzadeh M (2005) Experimental and theoretical research on hydro-mechanical coupling properties of rock joint. Ph.D. dissertation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

  • Suits LD, Sheahan TC, Seidel JP, Haberfield CM (2002) Laboratory testing of concrete-rock joints in constant normal stiffness direct shear. Geotech Test J 25:391–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JC, Jiang FX, Meng XJ, Wang XY, Zhu ST, Feng Y (2016) Mechanism of rock burst occurrence in specially thick coal seam with rock parting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:1953–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster S, Haycocks C, Karmis M (1984) Subsidence interaction effects in multi-seam mining. In: 2nd International Conference on Stability of Underground Mining. Lexington, pp 589–604

  • Williams TJ, Wideman CJ, Scott DF (1992) Case history of a slip-type rockburst. Pure Appl Geophys 139:627–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Zhao J (2014) A dynamic-induced direct-shear model for dynamic triggering of frictional slip on simulated granular gouges. Exp Mech 54:605–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia CC, Tang ZC, Xiao WM, Song YL (2014) New peak shear strength criterion of rock joints based on quantified surface description. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie HP, Chen ZH, Zhou HW, Yi C, Chen ZJ (2005) Study on two-body mechanical model based on interaction between structural body and geo-body. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 24:457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon JS, Zang A, Stephansson O (2012) Simulating fracture and friction of Aue granite under confined asymmetric compressive test using clumped particle model. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 49:68–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J (1997) Joint surface matching and shear strength part B, JRC-JMC shear strength criterion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZH, Wang WM, Wang LH, Dai CQ (2015) Compression-shear strength criterion of coal–rock combination model considering interface effect. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 47:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully wish to acknowledge the collaborative funding support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574225), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (YC150001), and a Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cai-Ping Lu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, CP., Liu, GJ., Liu, Y. et al. Mechanisms of Rockburst Triggered by Slip and Fracture of Coal–Parting–Coal Structure Discontinuities. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52, 3279–3292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01769-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01769-w

Keywords

Navigation