Advertisement

A Prognosis Methodology for Underground Infrastructure Damage in Sublevel Cave Mining

  • Mikael Svartsjaern
Original Paper
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

In sublevel caving (SLC), the caving of the hangingwall due to ore extraction emphasises placement of the mining infrastructure in the footwall. While the footwall in general is less affected by ground settlement compared to the hangingwall, the changes in stress field from mining are significant. The footwall infrastructure must thus be positioned sufficiently far into the footwall to avoid damage from the mining-induced stress; however, placing the infrastructure farther into the footwall increases costs associated with additional drifting and operational distances. This paper presents a case study in which a robust prognosis tool for predicting infrastructure damage associated with SLC mining is developed. The concept of the proposed methodology was developed for the Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara Aktiebolag Kiirunavaara SLC mine. Initial steps are data collection through systematic damage mapping followed by conceptual modelling of the general rock mass response to mining. The results of the conceptual models are used as the basis for refined calibrated models detailing the damage development and failure mechanisms. The main system behaviour, failure mechanism and associated damage evolution are incorporated into a bilinear equation using the studied depth and local ore width as input to estimate the final horizontal damage extent from the footwall contact after mining of any specific level. The proposed relationship accurately replicates the current damage pattern within 40 m for more than 70% of the recorded observations up until current mining. The anticipated future damage extent is also shown to be well correlated with current micro-seismic event locations. The connection between seismic rock mass damage and subsequent infrastructure damage during de-confinement suggests that current seismic records from operations, which currently experience no stability issues, might become important at later mining stages.

Keywords

Sublevel caving Numerical modelling Case study Kiirunavaara 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The author acknowledges the funding and right to publish granted for this study by LKAB. Thanks are also due to Centre of Mining and Metallurgy (CAMM) at Luleå University of Technology (LTU. The author also acknowledges the on-site and review contributions by LKAB research staff, in particular Karola Mäkitaavola, Åke Öhrn, Erik Swedberg (formerly LKAB), Mirjana Boskovic, Håkan Krekula (formerly LKAB), Britt-Mari Stöckel, and Dr. Ulf B Andersson. Finally, thanks are due to Dr. Andreas Eitzenberger (LTU), Associate Professor David Saiang (LTU) and Adjunct Professor Jonny Sjöberg (Itasca Consultants AB) for valuable comments throughout the study underlying this paper.

References

  1. Agliardi F, Crosta GB, Meloni F, Valle C, Rivolta C (2013) Structurally-controlled instability, damage and slope failure in a porphyry rock mass. Tectonophysics 605:34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson UB, Rutanen H (2016) Geological features in and around the Kiirunavaara ore body, northernmost Sweden, and some implications. In: International geological congress, Cape Town, p Paper 2989Google Scholar
  3. Bäckström A, Andersson UB, Haapala H, Simelius C, Magnor B, von Weisz F. et al. (2015) Strukturgeologisk kartering: U-ortar på nivå 1375 drivna fram till augusti 2014 (In Swedish). LKAB internal report, KirunaGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai M, Kaiser PK, Martin CD (2001) Quantification of rock mass damage in underground excavations from microseismic event monitoring. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:1135–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai M, Kaiser PK, Morioka H, Minami M, Maejima T, Tasaka Y et al (2007) FLAC/PFC coupled numerical simulation of AE in large-scale underground excavations. Inte J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:550–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavieres P, Gaete S, Lorig L, Gomez P (2003) Three-dimensional analysis of fracturing limits induced by large scale underground mining at el Teniente Mine. In: 12th panamerican conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering and 39th US symposium on rock mechanics. Verlag Glückauf GMBH, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Essen, pp 893–900Google Scholar
  7. Cifuentes CM, Zepeda RA, Parraguez RA, Gaete BS (2012) Implementation of systematic damage mapping for geotechnical evaluation, El Teniente Mine. In: 6th international conference & exhibition on mass mining, Sudbury, p. 6Google Scholar
  8. Dight PM (2006) Pit wall failures on “unknown” structures. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 106:451–458Google Scholar
  9. Eberhardt E, Stead D, Coggan JS (2004) Numerical analysis of initiation and progressive failure in natural rock slopes—the 1991 Randa rockslide. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edelbro C, Sjöberg J, Malmgren L, Dahner-Lindqvist C (2012) Prediction and follow-up of failure and fallouts in footwall drifts in the Kiirunavaara mine. Can Geotech J 49:546–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eniro (2016) Website and map service. http://kartor.eniro.se: http://kartor.eniro.se. Accessed 08 Apr 2016
  12. Geijer P (1960). The Kiruna iron ores. In: International geological congress: sulphide and iron ores of Västerbotten and Lappland, Northern Sweden. The Geological survey of Sweden, p 8Google Scholar
  13. Hazzard JF, Young RP (2000) Simulating acoustic emissions in bonded-particle models of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:867–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hazzard JF, Young RP (2004) Dynamic modelling of induced seismicity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:1365–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henry E, Dahnér-Lindqvist C (2000) Footwall stability at the LKAB’s Kiruna sublevel caving operation, Sweden. Massmin 2000. The Australasian institute of mining and metallurgy, Brisbane, pp 527–532Google Scholar
  16. Hoek E, Carter TG, Diedrerichs MS (2013) Quantification of the Geological Strength Index Chart. In: 47th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. ARMA, San Francisco, p 9Google Scholar
  17. Itasca Consulting Group Inc (2011) UDEC User’s guide version 5. ICG, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  18. Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2015) PFC 5.0 Documentation. ICG, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  19. Lupo JF (1996) Evaluation of deformations resulting from mass mining of an inclined orebody. Doctoral Thesis, Colorado School of MinesGoogle Scholar
  20. Mendecki AJ, Lynch AR, Malovichko DA (2010) Routine micro-seismic monitoring in mines. In: Australian earthquake engineering society 2010 conference, Perth, p 33Google Scholar
  21. Moss A, Diachenko S, Townsend P (2006) Interaction between the block cave and the pit slopes at Palabora mine. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 106:479–484Google Scholar
  22. Nilsson M, Saiang D, Eitzenberger A, Nordlund E (2014) Fracturing in the footwall at the Kiirunavaara mine, Sweden. In: 3rd international symposium on block and sublevel caving. Universidad de Chile, Santiago, pp 63–71Google Scholar
  23. Pardo C, Villaescusa E (2012) Methodology for back analysis of intensive rock mass damage at the el Teniente Mine. In: 6th international conference & exhibition on mass mining, Sudbury, p 9Google Scholar
  24. Sainsbury B, Pierce M, Mas Ivars D (2008) Analysis of caving behaviour using a synthetic rock mass (SRM)—ubiquitous joint rock mass (UJRM) modelling technique. In: 1st Southern hemisphere international rock mechanics symposium (SHIRMS), Perth, pp 243–252Google Scholar
  25. Sainsbury DP, Sainsbury BL, Paetzold H-D, Lourens P, Vakili A (2016) Caving-induced subsidence behaviour of lift 1 at the palabora block cave mine. In: Massmin 2016, Sydney, pp 415–426Google Scholar
  26. Salvoni M, Dight PM (2016) Rock damage assessment in a large unstable slope from microseismic monitoring—MMG Century mine (Queensland, Australia) case study. Eng Geol 210:45–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sand NS, Trinh QN (2011) Rana Gruber rock mechanics challenges connection with the establishment of a new main level and the transition to new mining method. In: 45th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. ARMA, San Francisco, p paper 233Google Scholar
  28. Sandström D (2003) Analysis of the virgin state of stress at the Kiirunavaara mine. Licentiate thesis, 02, Luleå University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  29. Shen B, Stephansson O, Einstein HH, Ghahrema B (1995) Coalescence of fractures under shear stresses in experiments. J Geophys Res 100:5975–5990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Singh UK, Stephansson OJ, Herdocia A (1993) Simulation of progressive failure in hangingwall and footwall for mining with sub-level caving. Trans Inst Min Metall A102:A188–A194Google Scholar
  31. Sitharam TG, Madhavi Latha G (2002) Simulation of excavations in jointed rock masses using a practical equivalent continuum approach. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sjöberg J (1999) Analysis of large scale rock slopes. Doctoral Thesis 01, Luleå University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  33. Snelling PE, Godin L, McKinnon SD (2013) The role of geologic structure and stress in triggering remote seismicity in Creighton mine, Sudbury, Canada. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 58:166–179Google Scholar
  34. Stephansson O, Bortg T, Bäckholm G (1978) Fracture Development in Hanging Wall of North Kiruna Mine. Luleå, Sweden: Technical Report 1978:51T Division of Rock Mechanics, Luleå University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  35. Stöckel B-M, Mäkitaavola K, Sjöberg J (2013) Hangingwall and footwall slope stability issues in sublevel caving. Slope stability 2013. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Brisbane, pp 1045–1060Google Scholar
  36. Svartsjaern M (2016) Status of the Footwall. LKAB internal document, KirunaGoogle Scholar
  37. Svartsjaern M, Eitzenberger A (2017) Determination of magnitude completeness from convex Gutenberg-Richter graphs in the central portion of the Kiirunavaara mine. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 117(6):545–560.  https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/2017/v117n6a5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Svartsjaern M, Saiang D (2017) Discrete element modelling of footwall rock mass damage induced by sub-level caving at the Kiirunavaara mine. Minerals 7(7):20.  https://doi.org/10.3390/min7070109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Svartsjaern MA, Saiang D, Nordlund E, Eitzenberger A (2016a) Conceptual numerical modeling of large scale footwall behavior at the Kiirunavaara mine, and implications for deformation monitoring. Rock Mech Rock Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0750-x Google Scholar
  40. Svartsjaern M, Saiang D, Mäkitaavola K (2016). Underground footwall monitoring at the Kiirunavaara SLC mine, Sweden. In: Seventh international conference and exhibition on mass mining. Ausimm, Sydney, pp 773–780Google Scholar
  41. Vatcher J, McKinnon SD, Sjöberg J (2016) Developing 3-D mine-scale geomechanical models in complex geological environments, as applied to the Kiirunavaara Mine. Eng Geol 203:140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Villegas T, Nordlund E (2008) Numerical simulation of the hangingwall subsidence using PFC2D. In: Massmin 2008 : proceedings of the 5th international conference and exhibition on mass mining. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, pp 907–916Google Scholar
  43. Villegas T, Nordlund E (2013) Numerical analyses of the hangingwall failure due to sublevel caving: study case. Int J Min Min Eng 4(3):201–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Villegas T, Nordlund E, Dahnér-Lindqvist C (2011) Hangingwall surface subsidence at the Kiirunavaara Mine, Sweden. Eng Geol 121:18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vyazmensky A, Stead D, Elmo D, Moss A (2010) Numerical analysis of block caving-induced instability in large open pit slopes: a finite element/discrete element approach. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Young RP, Collins DS, Reyes-Montes JM, Baker C (2004) Quantification and interpretation of seismicity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:1317–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang Y, Mitri H (2008) Elastoplastic stability analysis of mine haulage drift in the vicinity of mined stopes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:574–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Itasca Consultants ABLuleåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources EngineeringLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations