Advertisement

Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp 1729–1737 | Cite as

A Micromechanics-Based Elastoplastic Damage Model for Rocks with a Brittle–Ductile Transition in Mechanical Response

  • Kun Hu
  • Qi-zhi Zhu
  • Liang Chen
  • Jian-fu Shao
  • Jian Liu
Original Paper

Abstract

As confining pressure increases, crystalline rocks of moderate porosity usually undergo a transition in failure mode from localized brittle fracture to diffused damage and ductile failure. This transition has been widely reported experimentally for several decades; however, satisfactory modeling is still lacking. The present paper aims at modeling the brittle–ductile transition process of rocks under conventional triaxial compression. Based on quantitative analyses of experimental results, it is found that there is a quite satisfactory linearity between the axial inelastic strain at failure and the confining pressure prescribed. A micromechanics-based frictional damage model is then formulated using an associated plastic flow rule and a strain energy release rate-based damage criterion. The analytical solution to the strong plasticity-damage coupling problem is provided and applied to simulate the nonlinear mechanical behaviors of Tennessee marble, Indiana limestone and Jinping marble, each presenting a brittle–ductile transition in stress–strain curves.

Keywords

Brittle–ductile transition Effect of confining pressure Critical damage Micromechanical model Quasi-brittle rocks 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1501102), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51679068) and the 111 Project (B13024).

References

  1. Andrieux S, Bamberger Y, Marigo JJ (1986) Un modèle de matériau microfissureé pour les roches et les bétons. J Mec Theor Appl 5(3):471–513Google Scholar
  2. Benveniste Y (1987) A new approach to the application of mori-tanaka’s theory in composite materials. Mech Mater 6(2):147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bieniawski ZT (1967) Mechanism of brittle fracture of rock: part ii—experimental studies. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci Geomech Abstr 4(4):407–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen L, Wang CP, Liu JF, Liu J, Wang J, Jia Y, Shao JF (2015) Damage and plastic deformation modeling of beishan franite under compressive stress conditions. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(4):1623–1633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cundall PA, Potyondy D, Lee CA (1986) Micromechanics-based models for fracture and breakout around the mine-by tunnel. In: International Conference on Deep Geological Disposal of Radioactive WasteGoogle Scholar
  6. Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. Proc R Soc Lond 241(1226):376–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans B, Fredrich JT, Wong TF (1990) The brittle-ductile transition in rocks: recent experimental and theoretical progress. In: Duba AG, Durham WB, Handin JW, Wang HF (eds) The brittle-ductile transition in rocks. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  8. Handin J, Hager RV, Friedman M, Feather J (1963) Experimental deformation of sedimentary rocks under confining pressure: pore pressure tests. Bull Am Assoc Petr Geol 47(5):717–755Google Scholar
  9. Heard HC (1960) Transition from brittle fracture to ductile flow in solenhofen limestone as a function of temperature, confining pressure, and interstitial fluid pressure. Chapter 7. Geol Soc Am Mem 79:193–226Google Scholar
  10. Kachanov ML (1982) A microcrack model of rock inelasticity part I: frictional sliding on microcracks. Mech Mater 1(1):19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu ZB, Shao JF (2017) Strength behavior, creep failure and permeability change of a tight marble under triaxial compression. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(3):529–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mogi K (1966) Pressure dependence of rock strength and transition from brittle fracture to ductile flow. Bull Earthq Res Inst Univ Tokyo 44:215–332Google Scholar
  13. Mori T, Tanaka K (1973) Averages stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions. Acta Metall 21:571–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Paterson MS (1958) Experimental deformation and faulting in wombeyan marble. Geol Soc Am Bull 69(4):465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pensée V, Kondo D, Dormieux L (2002) Micromechanical analysis of anisotropic damage in brittle materials. J Eng Mech 128(8):889–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Qi M, Shao JF, Giraud A, Zhu QZ, Colliat JB (2016) Damage and plastic friction in initially anisotropic quasi brittle materials. Int J Plast 82:260–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Read RS (2004) 20 years of excavation response studies at AECL’s underground research laboratory. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(8):1251–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Song J, Zhou CR (2008) The brittle-plastic transition in experimentally deformated quartzite. Chin J High Press Phys 22(2):167–174Google Scholar
  19. Walton G, Hedayat A, Kim E, Labrie D (2017) Post-yield strength and dilatancy evolution across the brittle–ductile transition in indiana limestone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(7):1691–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang S (1993) Brittle–ductile transition and plastic-flow networks in rocks. Progr Geophys 8(4):25–37Google Scholar
  21. Wawersik WR, Fairhurst C (1970) A study of brittle rock fracture in laboratory compression experiments. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 7(5):561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wei YJ, Anand L (2008) On micro-cracking, inelastic dilatancy, and the brittle-ductile transition in compact rocks: a micro-mechanical study. Int J Solids Struct 45(10):2785–2798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wong TF, Baud P (2012) The brittle–ductile transition in porous rock: a review. J Struct Geol 44(11):25–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang SQ, Ju Y, Gao F, Gui YL (2016) Strength, deformability and X-ray micro-CT observations of deeply buried marble under different confining pressures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(11):4227–C4244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yao XX, Geng NG, Chen Y (1980) The effect of stress path on brittleness and ductile of rocks. Chin J Geophys 23(3):313–319Google Scholar
  26. Zhu QZ (2016) Strength prediction of dry and saturated brittle rocks by unilateral damage-friction coupling analyses. Comput Geotech 73:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhu QZ (2017) A new rock strength criterion from microcracking mechanisms which provides theoretical evidence of hybrid failure. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50(2):341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhu QZ, Shao JF (2015) A refined micromechanical damage-friction model with strength prediction for rock-like materials under compression. Int J Solids Struct 60–61:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhu QZ, Shao JF (2017) Micromechanics of rock damage: advances in the quasi brittle field. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 9(1):29–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhu QZ, Shao JF, Kondo D (2011) A micromechanics-based thermodynamic formulation of isotropic damage with unilateral and friction effects. Eur J Mech A Solids 30(3):316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhu QZ, Zhao LY, Shao JF (2016) Analytical and numerical analysis of frictional damage in quasi brittle materials. J Mech Phys Solids 92:137–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment EngineeringHohai UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.CNNC Key Laboratory on Geological Disposal of High-Level Radioactive WasteBeijing Research Institute of Uranium GeologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Laboratory of Mechanics of Lille, UMR8107 CNRSUniversity of LilleVilleneuve d’AscqFrance

Personalised recommendations