Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

, Volume 50, Issue 10, pp 2563–2584 | Cite as

Features of the Energy Balance and Fragmentation Mechanisms at Spontaneous Failure of Class I and Class II Rocks

Original Paper
  • 315 Downloads

Abstract

Practically, all types of rockbursts are accompanied by release of seismic energy, rock bulking (due to fracturing and fragmentation), and ejection of fragmented rocks in the opening. Principles of the energy redistribution during rockbursts in some regards are comparable with principles taking place at spontaneous failure of rock specimens under compression in loading systems. In both cases, the total potential elastic energy accumulated in the failing material and in the loading system (or surrounding rock mass) is converted into such components of dynamic energy as rupture energy, seismic energy (or energy of oscillation of the loading system due to dynamic energy release), and kinetic energy of flying fragments of the failed material. It is known that spontaneous failure takes place at the post-peak failure stage and is determined by the ratio between stiffness of the loading system and stiffness (or brittleness) of the failing material. However, principles of the energy redistribution between different components of the energy balance are still unclear. The paper discusses results of laboratory experiments conducted on rock specimens of different brittleness (including Class I and Class II) that were loaded in testing machines of different loading stiffness. The most brittle of the tested specimens are represented by quartzite and glass, and the less brittle by salt. The loading stiffness of testing machines used in experiments was variable within three decimal orders of magnitude. The specific variations of the dynamic energy balance depending on rock brittleness and loading stiffness were established. The role of each portion of elastic energy stemming from the specimen and from the loading system in determining the dynamic energy balance and fragmentation mechanisms operating at spontaneous failure is analysed. The results obtained contribute to the understanding of dynamic processes taking place during rockbursts.

Keywords

Spontaneous rock failure Dynamic energy balance Fragmentation mechanism Material brittleness Class I and Class II failure mode 

List of symbols

E

Elastic modulus

M

Post-peak modulus

σ

Axial stress

ε

Axial strain

F

Axial force

d

Axial displacement

We

Elastic energy stored in the specimen at the peak stress

Wr

Total post-peak rupture energy

Wr.in

Internal component of static post-peak rupture energy

Wr.ex

External component of static post-peak rupture energy

Wr(d)

Dynamic increment of the post-peak rupture energy

Wd

Surplus elastic energy responsible for dynamics

Wk

Kinetic energy of rock fragments

Wse

Seismic energy

dWe

Total elastic energy withdrawn from the specimen during post-peak failure

dWa

Elastic energy released during spontaneous failure

mo

Inertial mass of the specimen

mH

Inertial mass of the loading system

K1

Brittleness index

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems (COFS) at the University of Western Australia.

References

  1. Andreev GE (1995) Brittle failure of rock materials. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Aubertin M, Gill DE, Simon R (1994) On the use of the brittleness index modified (BIM) to estimate the post-peak behaviour of rocks. In: Proceedings of the 1st North American rock mechanics symposium, Balkema, pp 945–952Google Scholar
  3. Bergman SGA, Stille H (1983) Rockburst problems in a 2.6 million m3 underground crude oil storage in granite. In: Proceedings of the fifth congress ISRM, pp D302–D309Google Scholar
  4. Bieniawski ZT (1970) Time-dependent behaviour of fractured rock. Rock Mech 2:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bless SJ, Brar NS, Kanel G, Rosenberg Z (1992) Failure waves in glass. J Am Ceram Soc 75(4):1002–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clucklich J, Cohen LJ (1967) Size as a factor in the brittle–ductile transition and the strength of some materials. Int J Fract Mech 3:278–289Google Scholar
  7. Coates DF (1966) Experimental criteria for classification of rock substances. Int J Rock Min Sci 3:181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook NGW (1965) The failure of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2:389–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dight PM, Tarasov BG, O’Hare AW (2013) Determining the proneness of rock to strainburst. In: Malovichko, A, Malovichko, D (eds) 8th international symposium on rockbursts and seismicity in mines. ISBN: 978-5-903258-28-4Google Scholar
  10. Drescher A, Vardoulakis I (1982) Geometric softening in triaxial tests on granular material. Geotechnique 32:291–3003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galin LA, Cherepanov GI (1966) On self-supporting failure of a stressed brittle solid. Dokl AN SSSR 167(3):543–546 (in Russian) Google Scholar
  12. Grady DE (1981) Fragmentation of solids under impulsive stress loading. J Geophys Res 86(B2):1047–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He C, Okubo A, Nishimatsu Y (1990) A study on the class II behaviour of rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 32:261–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horii H, Nemat-Nasser S (1985) Compression-induced micro-crack growth in brittle solids: axial splitting and shear failure. J Geophys Res 90:3105–3125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hucka V, Das B (1974) Brittleness determination of rocks by different methods. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 11:389–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hudson JA, Crouch SL, Fairhurst C (1972) Soft, stiff and servo-controlled testing machines: a review with reference to rock failure. Eng Geol 6:155–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inoue A, Shen BL, Chang CT (2004) Super-high strength of over 4000 MPa for Fe-based bulk glassy alloys. Acta Mater 52:4093–4099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacobsson L (2007) Forsmark site investigation—Borehole KFM01C—UCS. SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute, BorasGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaiser PK, Cai M (2013) Critical review of design principles for rock support in burst-prone ground-time to rethink!. In: Potvin Y, Brady B (eds) Proceedings of the seventh international symposium on ground support in mining and underground construction, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp 3–37 Google Scholar
  20. Kanel GI, Razorenov SV, Fortov VE (2005) A failure wave phenomenon in brittle materials. In: Joint 20th AIRAPT–43th EHPRG, Karlsruhe/GermanyGoogle Scholar
  21. Kidybinski A (1981) Bursting liability indices of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 18:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King GCP, Sammis CG (1992) The mechanisms of finite brittle strain. PAGEOPH 138(4):611–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Labuz JF, Biolzi L (1991) Class I vs Class II stability: a demonstration of size effect. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 28(2/3):199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lockner DA, Byerlee JD, Kuksenko V, Ponomarev A, Sidorin A (1992) Observations of quasi-static fault growth from acoustic emissions. In: Evans B, Wong T-F (eds) Fault mechanics and transport properties of rocks. Academic, San Diego, pp 3–31Google Scholar
  25. McGarr A (1997) A mechanism for high wall-rock velocities in rockbursts. Pure appl Geophys 150:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Okubo S, Nishimatsu Y, He C (1990) Loading rate dependence of Class II rock behaviour in uniaxial and triaxial compression tests—an application of a proposed new control method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 27(6):559–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ortlepp WD, Stacey TR (1994) Rockburst mechanisms in tunnels and shafts. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 9(1):59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peng S, Johnson AM (1972) Crack growth and faulting in cylindrical specimens of Chelmsford granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 9:37–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petoukhov IM, Linkov AM (1983) Mechanics of rockburst and outburst. Nedra, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  30. Raith MM, Raase P, Reinhardt J (2012) Guide to thin section microscopy, 2nd edn. ISBN: 978-3-00-037671-9 Google Scholar
  31. Read HE, Hegemier GA (1984) Strain softening of rock, soil and concrete—a review article. Mech Mater 3:271–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reches Z, Lockner DA (1994) Nucleation and growth of faults in brittle rocks. J Geophys Res 99(B9):18159–18173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rinehart JS (1965) Dynamic fracture strengths of rocks. In: Proceedings of the seventh symposium on rock mechanics. Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosakis AJ (2002) Intersonic shear cracks and fault ruptures. Adv Phys 51(4):1189–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stavrogin AN (1968) Strength and deformation of rocks. Highest doctoral degree of technical science. The USSR State Geomechanical Institute, LeningradGoogle Scholar
  36. Stavrogin AN, Protossenia AG (1985) Rock strength and excavation stability in great depth. Nedra, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  37. Stavrogin AN, Tarasov BG (2001) Experimental physics and rock mechanics. Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  38. Stipp M, Stunitz H, Heilbronner R, Schmid SM (2002) The eastern Tonale fault zone: a ‘natural laboratory’ for crystal plastic deformation of quartz over a temperature range from 250 to 700°C. J Struct Geol 24:1861–1884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tarasov BG (2010) Superbrittleness of rocks at high confining pressure. Keynote lecture In: Van Sint Jan M, Potvin Y (eds) Fifth international seminar on deep and high stress mining, Santiago, Chile, pp 119–133Google Scholar
  40. Tarasov BG (2014) Hitherto unknown shear rupture mechanism as a source of instability in intact hard rocks at highly confined compression. Tectonophysics 621:69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tarasov BG, Potvin Y (2013) Universal criteria for rock brittleness estimation under triaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 59:57–69Google Scholar
  42. Wawersik WR, Fairhurst C (1970) A study of brittle rock fracture in laboratory compression experiments. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 7:561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu FF, Zhang ZZ, Shen BL, Mao SXY, Eckert J (2008) Size effect on shear fracture and fragmentation of a bulk metallic glass. Adv Eng Mater 10(8):727–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu YH, Cai M (2017) Influence of loading system stiffness on post-peak stress-strain curve of stable rock failures. Rock Mech Rock Eng. doi: 10.1007/s00603-017-1231-1 Google Scholar
  45. Yang B, Liaw PK, Wang G, Morrison M, Liu CT, Buchanan RA, Yokoyama Y (2004) In-situ thermographic observation of mechanical damage in bulk-metallic glasses during fatigue and tensile experiments. Intermetallics 12:1265–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang ZF, Zhang H, Shen BL, Inoue A, Eckert J (2006) Shear fracture and fragmentation mechanisms of bulk metallic glasses. Philos Mag Lett 86(10):643–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Offshore Foundation SystemsThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.School of Mining EngineeringUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations