Skip to main content

Analysis of the Behavior of Sedimentary Rocks Under Impact Loading

Abstract

In multiple engineering fields such as rock drilling or building constructions or extreme events like earthquakes or impacts, the dynamic properties of rock play an important role. A way to model these events and define measures to minimize the damage derived from these events is created by means of numerical analysis. Hence, the knowledge of the dynamic material behavior is essential for studying the effects of such a loading scenario. Solid geological materials, from the family of the sedimentary rocks, have been analyzed under quasi-static loads. However, there is a lack of knowledge when high strain rate loadings are involved. Within this context, the paper focuses on the experimental characterization of two sedimentary rocks, sandstone and limestone, under impact loading using the Hopkinson-Bar spallation and compression tests. The analysis encompasses the determination of the tensile and compressive properties as well as the comparison between the quasi-static and dynamic behavior (dynamic increase factors). The paper fills the gap of information existing about dynamic behavior of sedimentary rocks under strain rates between 100 and 5.2 × 102 s−1. Furthermore, the fragmentation under different strain rates is investigated and conclusions with respect to energy absorption capacity are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

References

  • Ai HA, Ahrens TJ (2004) Dynamic tensile strength of terrestrial rocks and application to impact cratering. Meteorit Planet Sci 39:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MA, Chakraborty T, Matsagar V, Rao KS, Sharma P, Singh M (2014) Characterization of Kota Sandstone under different strain rates in uniaxial loading. Geotech Geol, Eng

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Baijat HM (2008) The use of basalt aggregates in concrete mixes in Jordan. Jordan J Civ Eng 2:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino C, Inoue M, Miura H, Mizuta M, Okamoto T (2010) The effects of limestone aggregate on concrete properties. Constr Build Mater 24:2363–2368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell PB, Farmer IW (1976) Principles of engineering geology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blanton TL (1981) Effect of strain rates from 10−2 to 10 sec−1 in triaxial compression tests on three rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 18:47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhl E (2013) Brittle deformation of porous sandstone in hypervelocity impact experiments. Dissertation, University of Potsdam

  • Chakraborty T (2013) Impact simulation of rocks under SHPB test. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 79:605–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Song B (2011) Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CS, Pan E, Amadei B (1998) Determination of deformability and tensile strength of anisotropic rock using Brazilian tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35:43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai F, Huang S, Xia K, Tan Z (2010a) Some fundamental issues in dynamic compression and tension test of rocks using split Hopkinson pressure bar. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai F, Xia K, Tang L (2010b) Rate dependence of the flexural tensile strength of Laurentian granite. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 49:469–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2001) A split Hopkinson bar technique to determine compressive stress-strain data for rock materials. Exp Mech 41:40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frew DJ, Akers SA, Chen W, Green ML (2010) Development of a dynamic triaxial Kolsky bar. Meas Sci Technol 21:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green SJ, Perkings RD (1972) Uniaxial compression tests at strain rates from 10−4–104 sec−1 on three geological materials. In: Basic and applied rock mechanics

  • Green SJ, Leasua JD, Perkings RD, Jones AH (1972) Triaxial stress behaviour of Solenhofen Limestone and Westerly Granite at high strain rates. J Geophys Res 77:3711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerth T, Schäfer F, Thoma K, Kenkmann T, Poelchau M, Lexow B (2013) Hypervelocity impacts on dry and wet sandstone: observations of ejecta dynamics and crater growth. Meteorit Planet Sci 48:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerth T, Schäfer F, Hupfer J, Millon O (2015) Momentum transfer in hypervelocity impact experiments on rock targets. In: Proceedings of 13th hypervelocity impact symposium, Colorado

  • Hopkinson B (1914) A method of measuring the pressure produced in the detonation of high explosives or by the impact of bullets. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 213:437–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Chen W, Xia K (2010a) Quantification of dynamic tensile parameters of rocks using a modified SHB apparatus. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 2:162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Xia K, Yan F, Feng X (2010b) An Experimental Study Of The Rate Dependence Of Tensile Strength Softening of Longyou Sandstone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43:677–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (1974) Suggested methods for determining shear strength of rock materials

  • ISRM (1978a) Suggested methods for determining the strength of rock materials in triaxial compression. pp 285–291

  • ISRM (1978b) Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials

  • ISRM (1979) Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials

  • Kimberley J, Ramesh KT (2011) The dynamic strength of an ordinary chondrite. Meteorit Planet Sci 46:1653–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleepmek M, Fuenkajorn K (2015) Strengths of rock fractures as affected by shear velocities and confinements. Vietrock, Hanoi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi R (1970) On mechanical behaviour of rocks under various loading-rates. Rock Mech Jpn 1:56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubota S, Ogata Y, Wada Y (2008) Estimation of dynamic tensile strength of sandstone. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam T, Martin D, McCreath D (2007) Characterising the geomechanics properties of the sedimentary rocks for the DGR excavations. OttawaGeo, pp 636–644

  • Laughlin GR (1960) Limestone fine aggregate in Portland cement concrete. Highways Materials Research Laboratory, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J-Z, Xu J-Y, Lv X-C, Zhao D-H, Leng B-L (2012) Experimental study on dynamic mechanical properties of amphibolites, sericite-quartz schist and sandstone under impact loadings. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 13:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Li D, Zhao F, Wang C (2014) Fragmentation characteristics analysis of sandstone fragments based on impact rockburst test. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan JM, Handin J (1971) Triaxial compression testing at intermediate strain rates. In: Clark GB (ed) Dynamic rock mechanics. Proceedings 12th symposium on rock mechanics, New York, pp 167–194

  • Millon O (2010) Charakterisierung eines hochfesten Stahlfaserbetons - statische und dynamische Materialparameterbestimmung. Fraunhofer Institut für Kurzzeitdynamik, Ernst-Mach-Institut (EMI), Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon O, Sauer M, Riedel W (2013) Beton unter hohen Belastungsgeschwindigkeiten. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • NZ Geotechnical Society Inc. (2005) Field description of soil and rock. In: Burns D, Farqhuar G, Mills M, Williams A (eds) Guideline for the field classification and description of soil and rock for engineering purposes. Wellington. Available online:http://www.nzgs/Publications/Guidelines/soil_and_rock.pdf

  • Poelchau M, Kenkmann T, Thoma K, Hoerth T, Dufresne A, Schäfer F (2013) The MEMIN research unit: scaling impact cratering experiments in porous sandstones. Meteorit Planet Sci 48:8–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Ripoll ML, Stolz A (2014) Structural integrity of tunnels under explosive threat scenarios. Anal Mec Fract 31:553–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Ripoll ML, Millon O, Hoerth T (2015) Dynamic behavior of brittle geological materials under high strain rates. Anal Mec Fract 32:178–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Salah H, Omar M, Shanableh A (2014) Estimating unconfined compressive strength of sedimentary rocks in United Arab Emirates from Point Load Strength Index. J Appl Math Phys 2:296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz A, Ruiz-Ripoll ML (2016) Experimental and computational characterization of dynamic loading and structural resistance of tunnels in blast scenarios. Fire Technol 52:1595–1618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoma K, Stolz A, Millon O (2012) Performance and suitability of ultra-high-performance concrete under a broad range of dynamic loading. In: Hoa H, Zhong-Xian L (eds) Advances in protective structures research. Taylor & Francis, Leiden, pp 65–98

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Xia K, Yao W (2015) Dynamic rock tests using split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar system—a review. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 7:27–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz M, Tuğrul A (2012) The effects of different sandstone aggregates on concrete strength. Constr Build Mater 35:294–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou YX, Xia K, Li XB, Li HB, Ma GW, Zhao J, Zhou ZL, Dai F (2012) Suggested methods for determining the dynamic strength parameters and mode-I fracture of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 49:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted in the framework of the NEOShield project which is funded by the Seventh Framework Program (FP7) of the European Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Luisa Ruiz-Ripoll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Millon, O., Ruiz-Ripoll, M.L. & Hoerth, T. Analysis of the Behavior of Sedimentary Rocks Under Impact Loading. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49, 4257–4272 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1010-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1010-4

Keywords

  • Impact
  • Sedimentary rocks
  • Dynamic behavior
  • Split-Hopkinson-Bar
  • DIF
  • Spallation
  • Compression