Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of Fracture Initiation Pressure and Fracture Geometries in Elastic Isotropic and Anisotropic Formations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laminated formation structures in shale formations may have elastic anisotropic properties, including Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio, that impact hydraulic fracturing treatment execution. Fracture initiation pressures and geometries are affected by these properties, especially in cased and in perforated horizontal wells. After initiation, stress concentration around the wellbore may cause the creation of longitudinal fractures (LFs) in the near-wellbore zone that reorient to transverse fractures (TFs) beyond this region. In this case, severe fracture kinking may occur that may hinder the transport of proppants and reduce well productivity. We developed an analytical model based on linear fracture mechanics theory to study the effect of perforation geometries on the initiation fracture pattern. Elastic anisotropy and well deviations were incorporated into simulations. Our simulation results show that when the perforation depth is in a specific range under normal fault regime, the initiation pressures for LFs can be smaller than the maximum horizontal stress \(\sigma_{H}\). This behavior is significant for a smaller \(\sigma_{H} /\sigma_{v}\) ratio, but it vanishes for a larger \(\sigma_{H} /\sigma_{v}\) ratio. With increasing formation elastic anisotropy (\(K_{aniso}\)), the initiation pressures for both LFs and TFs increase, and the critical perforation depth is decreased. Considering the well deviation, the well azimuth and inclination angles affect initiation pressures for both longitudinal and transverse fractures. Results show how perforation depth, shale elastic anisotropy, and well orientation affect fracture initiation patterns. This paper provides a framework for well completion designs and well orientation designs to minimize the fracture kinking in the near-wellbore region in shale formations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(\sigma_{H}\) :

Maximum horizontal stress

\(\sigma_{h}\) :

Minimum horizontal stress

\(\sigma_{v}\) :

Overburden stress

\(K_{iso}\) :

Lateral stress coefficient for mechanical isotropic formations

\(K_{aniso}\) :

Lateral stress coefficient for mechanical transversely isotropic formations

\(E\) :

Young’s modulus

\(v\) :

Poisson’s ratio

\(E_{h}\) :

Young’s modulus in a horizontal direction

\(E_{v}\) :

Young’s modulus in a vertical direction

\(v_{h}\) :

Poisson’s ratio in a horizontal direction

\(v_{v}\) :

Poisson’s ratio in a vertical direction

\(G\) :

Shear modulus

\(g\) :

Gravity acceleration

\(\rho (z)\) :

Bulk density

\(z\) :

Formation depth

\(\alpha\) :

Biot’s poroelastic coefficient

\(P_{p}\) :

Pore pressure

\(\sigma_{H,Tectonic}\) :

Tectonic loading in maximum horizontal stress direction

\(\sigma_{h,Tectonic}\) :

Tectonic loading in minimum horizontal stress direction

\(\theta_{az}\) :

Well azimuth angle

\(\theta_{inc}\) :

Well inclination angle

\(\sigma_{\theta \theta }\) :

Hoop stress

\(r_{w}\) :

Wellbore radius

\(P_{b}\) :

Wellbore pressure

\(l_{0}\) :

Perforation depth

\(K_{I}\) :

Stress intensity factor for mode I cracks

\(p_{f} (x)\) :

Fracturing pressure

\(\sigma_{c} (x)\) :

Clamping stress

\(K_{IC}\) :

Fracture toughness for mode I cracks

\(k_{n}\) :

Normal stiffness

\(k_{s}\) :

Shear stiffness

\(u_{n}\) :

The displacement under compression stress

\(u_{s}\) :

The displacement under shear stress

\(\mu\) :

Fluid viscosity

L :

The block element size

\(F_{n}\) :

Normal force exerted on the matrix element interfaces

\(F_{s}\) :

Shear force exerted on the matrix element interfaces

Q :

The injection volumetric flow rate per unit length

\(q_{m}\) :

The leak-off rate per unit length into matrix rocks

\(s\) :

The distance along the fracture

t :

Time

\(w_{0}\) :

The initial (unbroken) fracture aperture

\(k_{f}\) :

Fracture permeability

\(\sigma_{ij}\) :

Cauchy stress tensor

\(b_{i}\) :

Body force

u i :

Displacement

\(a_{i}\) :

Damping factor

ε st :

Strain

\(D_{ijst}\) :

Elasticity tensor

S 0 :

Cohesion

\(\varphi\) :

Friction angle

\(T_{0}\) :

Tensile strength

\(w_{m}^{(n)}\) :

Fracture width of the mth fracture element at the nth time step

\(P_{m}^{(n)}\) :

Fluid pressure in the mth fracture element at the nth time step

References

  • Abbas S, Lecampion B, Prioul R (2013) Competition between transverse and axial hydraulic fractures in horizontal wells. In: 2013 SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA

  • Ahmed IA, Ehlig-Economides C (2013) Investigation of created fracture geometry through hydraulic fracture treatment analysis. In: 2013 SPE Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA

  • Amadei B, Savage WZ, Swolfs HS (1987) Gravitational stresses in anisotropic rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 24(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor GK (1967) An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrmann LA, Elbel J (1991) Effect of perforations on fracture initiation. J Pet Tech 43(5):608–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueckner H (1970) A novel principle for the computation of stress intensity factors. Z Angew Math Mech 50(9):529–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Daneshy AA (2011) Hydraulic fracturing of horizontal wells: issues and insights. In: 2011 SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA

  • Daneshy AA, Herman DS, Tymko DW (2012) Investigation of horizontal well fracture extension pattern based on downhole pressure data. In: SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA

  • Hossain MM, Rahman MK, Rahman SS (2000) Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation: roles of wellbore trajectory, perforation and stress regimes. J Pet Sci Eng 27(3):129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JC, Cook NGW, Zimmerman RW (2007) Fundamental of rock mechanics, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey RG, Chen ZR, Zhang X et al (2015) Measurement and analysis of full-scale hydraulic fracture initiation and reorientation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(6):2497–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Williams RE, Ansari S, Khosravi N (2012) Impact of mechanical anisotropy on design of hydraulic fracturing in shales. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Lei X, Zhang S, Xu G, Zou Y (2015) Impact of perforation on hydraulic fracture initiation and extension in tight natural gas reservoirs. Energy Technol 3:618–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Zou YS, Valko PP, Ehlig-Economides C (2016) Hydraulic fracture height predictions in laminated shale formations using finite element discrete element method. In: SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA

  • Nilson R, Proffer W (1984) Engineering formulas for fractures emanating from cylindrical and spherical holes. J Appl Mech 51:929–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prioul R, Karpfinger F, Deenadayalu C, Suarez-Rivera R (2011) Improving fracture initiation predictions on arbitrarily oriented wells in anisotropic shales. In: SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference Calgary, Alberta, Canada

  • Rice J (1972) Some remarks on elastic crack-tip stress fields. Int J Sol Struct 8:757–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanchits S et al (2014) Onset of hydraulic fracture initiation monitored by acoustic emission and volumetric deformation measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47(5):1521–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Schechter D (2014) Optimization-based unstructured meshing algorithms for simulation of hydraulically and naturally fractured reservoirs with variable distribution of fracture aperture, spacing, length and strike. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  • Sun J, Huang CK, Schechter D (2015) Sensitivity analysis of unstructured meshing parameters on production forecast of hydraulically fractured horizontal wells. In: Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE

  • Thiercelin MJ, Plumb RA (1994) A core-based prediction of lithologic stress contrasts in east Texas formations. SPE Form Eval 9(04):251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters GA, Heinze JR, Jackson R, Ketter AA, Daniels JL, Bentley D (2006) Use of horizontal well image tools to optimize Barnett shale reservoir exploitation. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA

  • Weijers L, De Pater CJ, Owens KA, Kogsbøll HH (1994) Geometry of hydraulic fractures induced from horizontal wellbores. SPE Prod Facil 9(02):87–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yew CH (1997) Mechanics of Hydraulic fracturing. Elsevier Science, Burlington. ISBN 9780080536064

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H et al (2015) Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation from wellbore with oriented perforation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(2):585–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Y (2014) Investigation into the mechanism of fracture-network fracturing in shale gas reservoirs. Dissertation, China University of Petroleum, Beijing

  • Zou Y, Ma X, Zhang S, Zhou T, Ehlig-Economides C, Li H (2015) The origins of low-fracture conductivity in soft shale formations: an experimental study. Energy Technol 3:1233–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Apache for providing the field data for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Zou, Y.S., Liu, S. et al. Prediction of Fracture Initiation Pressure and Fracture Geometries in Elastic Isotropic and Anisotropic Formations. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50, 705–717 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1002-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1002-4

Keywords

Navigation