Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Curing Time on Tensile Mechanical Properties of Thin Spray-on Liners

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of curing time on tensile elastic material properties of thin spray-on liners (TSLs) were investigated in this study. Two different TSL products supplied by two manufacturers were tested comparatively. The “dogbone” tensile test samples that were prepared in laboratory conditions with different curing times (1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days) were tested based on ASTM standards. It was concluded that longer curing times improves the tensile strength and the Young’s Modulus of the TSLs but decreases their elongation at break. Moreover, as an additional conclusion of the testing procedure, it was observed that during the tensile tests, the common malpractice of measuring sample displacement from the grips of the loading machine with a linear variable displacement transducer versus the sample’s gauge length had a major impact on modulus and deformation determination of TSLs. To our knowledge, true stress–strain curves were generated for the first time in TSL literature within this study. Numerical analyses of the laboratory tests were also conducted using Particle Flow Code in 2 Dimensions (PFC2D) in an attempt to guide TSL researchers throughout the rigorous PFC simulation process to model support behaviour of TSLs. A scaling coefficient between macro- and micro-properties of PFC was calculated which will help future TSL PFC modellers mimic their TSL behaviours for various tensile loading support scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibald JF (2001) Assessing acceptance criteria for and capabilities of liners for mitigating ground falls. MASHA. In: Health and safety conference. Sudbury

  • Archibald JF, Degagne DO (2000) Recent Canadian advances in the application of spray-on polymeric linings. In: Mining health and safety conference, Sudbury, Ontario

  • ASTM D638-10 (2010) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SVL, McCreath DR (1995) Shotcrete support design in blocky ground: towards a deterministic approach. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 10(1):79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai W (2013) Discrete element modelling of constant strain rate and creep tests on a graded asphalt mixture. Dissertation, University of Nottingham

  • Carstens R (2005) Thin sprayed liners-adding or destroying value. In: 1st international seminar on strategic versus tactical approaches in mining. Symposium Series 40. SAIMM. Johannesburg, pp 327--335

  • Carstens R, Oosthuizen AO (2004) Application of a thin sprayed liner (TSL) in VCR gullies behind advancing stope panels at Savuka Gold Mine. In: South African national institute for rock engineering (SANIRE) symposium, the miner’s guide through the earth’s crust, pp 89--94

  • Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Gotechnique 29(1):47–65. doi:10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirige APE, Archibald JF (2009) Numerical modeling simulations of spray-on liners support potential in highly stressed and rockburst prone rock conditions. In: Grasselli G, Diederichs M (ed) Proceedings of 3rd Canada-US rock mechanics symposium. Toronto

  • EFNARC (2008) Specification and guidelines on thin spray-on liners for mining and tunneling. ENC 250TSL v7.2 25-07-08

  • Espley S, Tannant DD, Baiden G, Kaiser PK (1999) Design criteria for thin spray-on membrane support for underground hardrock mining. Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Annual Meeting, Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Espley SJ, Gustas R, Heilig J, Moreau LH (2001) Thin spray-on liner research and field trials at INCO. In: Section 25 international seminar and field trials on surface support liners: membrane, shotcrete and mesh. Perth

  • Finn D (2001) Polymer membrane test. surface support liners: membranes, shotcrete and mesh, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Australia. (Sect. 20)

  • Fowkes N, Teixeira JA, Stacey TR (2008) Crack repair using an elastic filler. J Mech Phys Solids 56(9):2749–2758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S, Saydam S, Mitra R (2010) Laboratory investigation of the potential use of thin spray-on liners in underground coal mines, the symposium of extracting the science: a century of mining research. Littleton

  • Guner D (2014) Experimental and numerical analysis of effect of curing time on tensile strength and elastic material properties of thin spray-on liners. Dissertation, Middle East Technical University

  • Hamstad MA, Gillis PP (1966) Effective strain rates in low-speed uniaxial tension tests. Mater Res Stand 6(11):569–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawker R (2001) Tekflex—new areas of application. Surface support liners: membranes, shotcrete and mesh. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth (Sect. 17)

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 527 (2012) Plastics—determination of tensile properties. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Itasca (2008) PFC2D (particle flow code in 2 dimensions) manual, Version 4.0 edn. ICG, Minneapolis, Minnesota

  • Jensen P (2013) Managing the engineering, health & safety aspects of thin spray-on liner application. Dissertation, Luleå University of Technology

  • Kias CM (2013) Investigation of unstable failure in underground coal mining using the discrete element method. Dissertation, Colorado School of Mines

  • Komurlu E, Kesimal A (2014) Improved performance of rock bolts using sprayed polyurea coating. Rock Mech Rock Eng. doi:10.1007/s00603-014-0696-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijpers J (2001) Evaluation of membrane support behaviour. Surface Support Liners: Membranes, shotcrete and Mesh. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth (Sect. 21)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijpers JS, Sellers EJ, Toper AZ, Rangasamy T, Ward T, Van Rensburg AJ, Yilmaz H, Stacey R (2004) Required technical specifications and standard testing methodology for thin sprayed linings. SIMRAC Final Report. Research agency: CSIR Division of Mining Technology. Project No: SIM 020206, Report No: 2004-0404

  • Lacerda L, Rispin M (2002) Current ground support membrane applications in North American underground mines. In: 2nd international seminar on surface support liners: thin sprayed liners, shotcrete, mesh. Johannesburg

  • Lau V, Saydam S, Cai Y, Mitra R (2008) Laboratory investigation of support mechanism for thin spray-on liners. In: 12th international conference of international association for computer methods and advances in geomechanics (IACMAG) Goa, India, pp 1381--1388

  • Lewis B (2001) Mondi rock-HoldTM the development of this structural membrane support. Surface support liners: membranes, shotcrete and mesh. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth (Sect. 18)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Saydam S, Mitra R, Chalmers D (2015) Investigation on adhesion strength of thin spray-on liners in an underground coal mine. In: Coal operators’ conference, pp 191--197

  • Maidl B, Thewes M, Maidl U (2013) Handbook of tunnel engineering volume I: structures and methods, 1st edn. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mason DP, Abelman H (2009) Support provided to rock excavations by a system of two liners. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1197–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason DP, Stacey TR (2008) Support to rock excavations provided by sprayed liners. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:773–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MasterRoc TSL 865 Safety Data Sheet. http://assets.master-builders-solutions.basf.com/Shared%20Documents/PDF/English%20(United%20Kingdom)/basf-masterroc-tsl865-(meyco-tsl865)-sds.pdf. Accessed Dec 2015

  • Mpunzi M (2012) The properties and performance of selected thin spray on liners for rock support. Dissertation, University of Witwatersrand

  • Mpunzi P, Masethe R, Rizwan M, Stacey TR (2015) Enhancement of the tensile strengths of rock and shotcrete by thin spray-on liners. Tunn Undergr Space Technol. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2015.05.013

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk H (2005) Adhesion between thin spray-on liners and rock or concrete. Dissertation. University of Alberta

  • Ozturk H (2012a) Work of adhesion of thin spray-on liners. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(6):1095–1102. doi:10.1007/s00603-012-0238-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk H (2012b) Fracture mechanics interpretation of thin spray-on liner adhesion tests. Int J Adhes Adhes Sci 34:17–23. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk H, Tannant DD (2003) Influence of rock properties and environmental conditions on adhesive bond to a thin liner. In: 3rd international seminar on surface support liners: thin spray­on liners, shotcrete and mesh, Quebec City, Canada. (Sect. 12)

  • Ozturk H, Tannant DD (2010) Thin spray-on liner adhesive strength test method and effect of liner thickness on adhesion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:808–815. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk H, Tannant DD (2011) Influence of rock properties and environmental conditions on thin spray-on liner adhesive bond. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(7):1196–1198. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas DM, Barton TM, Eric SW (2003) The long-term performance of surface support liners for ground control in a underground limestone mine. In: 3rd International seminar on surface support liners: thin spray-on liners, shotcrete and mesh, Quebec City, Canada. (Sect. 22)

  • Pickett A, Thomas A (2013) Where are we now with sprayed concrete lining in tunnels? http://shotcrete.org/media/Archive/2013Fal_GoinUnderground.pdf. Accessed 16.06.2015

  • Potvin Y, Stacey TR, Hadjigeorgiou J (eds) (2004) Thin spray-on liners (TSLs), surface support in mining. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Potyondy DO (2012) A flat-jointed bonded-particle material for hard rock. In: 46th U.S. Rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, 24--27 June, Chicago

  • Qiao Q, Nemcik J, Porter I, Baafi E (2014) Laboratory investigation of support mechanism of thin spray-on liner for pillar reinforcement. Geotech Lett. doi:10.1680/geolett.14.00076

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiao Q, Nemcik J, Porter I, Baafi E (2015) Compressive strength testing of toughskin thin spray-on liner. In: Coal operators’ conference, pp 198-203

  • Saydam S, Yilmaz H, Stacey TR (2004) A new testing approach for thin spray-on liners: double-sided shear strength (DSS) test. In: Potvin Y, Stacey TR, Hadjigeorgiou J (eds) Surface support in mining. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, pp 151–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearing AJS, Gelson J (2002) Developments and the future of thin reactive liners since the previous conference in Australia. In: 2nd international seminar on surface support liners: thin sprayed liners, shotcrete, mesh. SAIMM, Sandton, RSA. (Sect. 13)

  • Spearing AJS, Ohler J, Attogbe E (2001) The effective testing of thin support membranes for use in underground mines. In: Surface Support Liners: Membranes, Shotcrete and Mesh, Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Australia

  • Spearing AJS, Borejszo G, Campoli A (2009) The application of a structural thin support liner (TSL) on mines. In: 43rd U.S. rock mechanics symposium

  • Stacey TR (2001) Review of membrane support mechanisms, loading mechanisms, desired membrane performance, and appropriate test methods. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 101(7):343–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey TR, Kasangula M (2003) Results from testing of TSL’s using a simple, low cost laboratory test. In: 3rd international seminar on surface support liners: thin spray-on liners, shotcrete and mesh, Quebec City, Canada. (Sect. 17)

  • Stacey TR, Yu X (2004) Investigations into mechanisms of rock support provided by sprayed liners. Ground support in mining and underground construction. In: Villaescusa E, Potvin Y (eds) Proceedings of 5th international symposium on ground support, Perth, Australia. A A Balkema, Avereest, pp 563–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey TR, Mason DP, Fowkes N (2009) A review of mechanisms of shotcrete and thin spray-on liner support, and recent investigations. In: Proceedings of conference “Shotcrete for Africa”. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., pp 237--249

  • Swan G, Spencer EJ, Graham C, Hastings D, Rayner TJ, Livingstone D, McDonald NW, Bond B (2012) Towards proving the feasibility of a new, composite polymer liner. Eurock, Stockholm

  • Tannant DD (2001) Thin spray-on liners for underground rock support—testing and design issues. In: International seminar and field trials on surface support liners: membrane, shotcrete and mesh, Perth, Australia, pp 1--18

  • Tannant DD, Ozturk H (2003) Evaluation of test methods for measuring adhesion between a liner and rock. In: 3rd international seminar on surface support liners: thin spray-on liners, shotcrete and mesh, Quebec City, Canada. (Sect. 13)

  • Tannant DD, Wang C (2002) Thin rock support liners modeled with particle flow code. In: Discrete, element methods, pp 346--352. doi: 10.1061/40647(259)61

  • Tannant DD, Swan G, Espley S, Graham C (1999) Laboratory test procedures for validating the use of thin sprayed-on liners for mesh replacement. CIM AGM, Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnelguard http://www.smsconstruct.com/brochure/TunnelGuard.pdf. Accessed Dec 2015

  • Villaescusa E (2014) Geotechnical design for sublevel open stoping. CRC Press, London. doi:10.1201/b16702-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CG, Tannant DD (2002) Rock fracture around a highly stressed tunnel and the impact of a thin tunnel liner for ground control. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:676–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz H (2007) Shear-bond strength testing of thin spray-on liners. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 107(8):519–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz H, (2011) Development of testing methods for comparative assessment of Thin Spray-on Liner (TSL) shear and tensile properties. Dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand

  • Yilmaz H, Saydam S, Henderson D (2003) Torque testing of thin spray-on liner coated cores. international workshop and seminar surface support liners: thin spray-on liners, shotcrete and mesh, August 25--26 2003, Quebec City, Canada

  • Zhenjun S, Porter I, Nemcik J, Baafi E (2014) Comparing the reinforcement capacity of welded steel mesh and a thin spray-on liner using large scale laboratory tests. Int J Min Sci Technol. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.03.015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by METU Scientific Research Projects Coordination Center (BAP-08-11-2012-104). Constructive suggestions from Dr. Giovanni Barla and anonymous reviewers are acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Guner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guner, D., Ozturk, H. Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Effects of Curing Time on Tensile Mechanical Properties of Thin Spray-on Liners. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49, 3205–3222 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0997-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0997-x

Keywords

Navigation