Skip to main content
Log in

An Analytical Model for Assessing Stability of Pre-Existing Faults in Caprock Caused by Fluid Injection and Extraction in a Reservoir

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Induced seismicity and fault reactivation associated with fluid injection and depletion were reported in hydrocarbon, geothermal, and waste fluid injection fields worldwide. Here, we establish an analytical model to assess fault reactivation surrounding a reservoir during fluid injection and extraction that considers the stress concentrations at the fault tips and the effects of fault length. In this model, induced stress analysis in a full-space under the plane strain condition is implemented based on Eshelby’s theory of inclusions in terms of a homogeneous, isotropic, and poroelastic medium. The stress intensity factor concept in linear elastic fracture mechanics is adopted as an instability criterion for pre-existing faults in surrounding rocks. To characterize the fault reactivation caused by fluid injection and extraction, we define a new index, the “fault reactivation factor” η, which can be interpreted as an index of fault stability in response to fluid pressure changes per unit within a reservoir resulting from injection or extraction. The critical fluid pressure change within a reservoir is also determined by the superposition principle using the in situ stress surrounding a fault. Our parameter sensitivity analyses show that the fault reactivation tendency is strongly sensitive to fault location, fault length, fault dip angle, and Poisson’s ratio of the surrounding rock. Our case study demonstrates that the proposed model focuses on the mechanical behavior of the whole fault, unlike the conventional methodologies. The proposed method can be applied to engineering cases related to injection and depletion within a reservoir owing to its efficient computational codes implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

D :

A homogeneous, isotropic infinite elastic medium

Ω:

A reservoir domain in D

D – Ω:

The surrounding rock (i.e., the caprock)

\( \varepsilon_{ij}^{*} \) :

An eigenstrain within the reservoir Ω

\( \delta_{ij} \) :

The Kronecker delta

α :

The Biot–Willis coefficient

T :

Temperature change

P :

Pore pressure change

ψ :

Coefficient of linear thermal expansion for the solid

µ :

Shear modulus for the solid

v :

Poisson’s ratio for the solid

λ :

Lame constant for the solid

C ijkl :

Elastic stiffness tensor for the solid

\( \Delta u_{i} ({\mathbf{x}}) \) :

Displacement field caused by the eigenstrain \( \varepsilon_{ij}^{*} \)

\( \Delta \varepsilon_{ij} ({\mathbf{x}}) \) :

Strain tensor caused by the eigenstrain \( \varepsilon_{ij}^{*} \)

\( \Delta \sigma_{ij} ({\mathbf{x}}) \) :

Stress tensor caused by the eigenstrain \( \varepsilon_{ij}^{*} \)

\( G_{ij} ({\mathbf{x}},{\mathbf{x}}^{{\prime }} ) \) :

The Green’s function

\( G_{ij,k} \) :

First derivation of the Green’s function

\( G_{ij,kp} \) :

Second derivative of the Green’s functions

γ ij :

Normalized stress arching ratios

x 10, x 20 :

Coordinates of the center of a fault

2l :

Length of the fault

θ :

Fault dip angle

x 1(t), x 2(t):

Coordinate of each point on fault surfaces

σ 11 :

In-situ horizontal principle stress

σ 22 :

In-situ vertical principle stress

σ p :

Compressive stress on the fault surfaces under in situ stress

τ p :

Absolute value of the shear stress on the fault surfaces under in situ stress

Δσ p :

Perturbed compressive stress on the fault surfaces

Δτ p :

Perturbed shear stress on the fault surfaces

f :

Friction coefficient

φ :

Reservoir tilt angle

K 0 :

Mode-II SIF under uniformly distributed in situ tectonic stress

ΔK up, ΔK down :

Disturbed mode-II SIFs for the upper and lower tips of a fault, respectively

ΔK :

Representative disturbed mode-II SIF for a fault [ΔK = max (ΔK up, ΔK down)]

η :

Fault reactivation factor

K c :

In-situ rock mode-II fracture toughness

PSC:

Pore pressure/stress coupling

SIF:

Stress intensity factor

LEFM:

Linear elastic fracture mechanics

∆CFS :

The Coulomb failure stress change

References

  • Altmann JB, Müller TM, Müller BI, Tingay MR, Heidbach O (2010) Poroelastic contribution to the reservoir stress path. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(7):1104–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann J, Müller B, Müller T, Heidbach O, Tingay M, Weißhardt A (2014) Pore pressure stress coupling in 3D and consequences for reservoir stress states and fault reactivation. Geothermics 52:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardainne T, Dubos-Sallée N, Sénéchal G, Gaillot P, Perroud H (2008) Analysis of the induced seismicity of the Lacq gas field (Southwestern France) and model of deformation. Geophys J Int 172:1151–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry NW, Raghu NS, Gexin S (1992) Rock fracture mechanics principles design and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12(2):155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee J (1978) Friction of rocks. Pure Appl Geophys 116(4–5):615–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui ZD, Liu DA, Zeng RS, Niu JR, Wang HJ, Shi XS (2013) Resistance of caprock to hydraulic fracturing due to CO2 injection into sand lens reservoirs. Eng Geol 164:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth WL (2013) Injection-induced earthquakes. Science 341(6142):1225942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelder T, Fischer MP (1994) Influence of poroelastic behavior on the magnitude of minimum horizontal stress, S h in overpressured parts of sedimentary basins. Geology 22(10):949–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshelby JD (1957) The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. Royal Soc 241:376–396

  • Eshelby JD (1959) The elastic field outside an ellipsoidal inclusion. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. Royal Soc 252:561–569

  • Feignier B, Grasso JR (1990) Seismicity induced by gas production: I. Correlation of focal mechanisms and dome structure. Pure appl Geophys 134:405–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertsma J (1973) Land subsidence above compacting oil and gas reservoirs. J Petrol Technol 25(6):734–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso JR, Feignier B (1990) Seismicity induced by gas production: II. Lithology correlated events, induced stresses and deformation. Pure appl Geophys 134:427–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasso JR, Wittlinger G (1990) Ten years of seismic monitoring over a gas field. B Seismol Soc Am 80:450–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Haekes C, McLellan P, Bachu S (2005) Geomechanical factors affecting geological storage of CO2 in depleted oil and gas reservoirs. J Can Petrol Technol 44(10):52–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy J, Rubey W, Griggs D, Raleigh C (1968) The denver earthquakes. Science 161(3848):1301–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillis R (2000) Pore pressure/stress coupling and its implications for seismicity. Explor Geophys 31(1/2):448–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillis RR (2001) Coupled changes in pore pressure and stress in oil fields and sedimentary basins. Petrol Geosci 7(4):419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitzman M (2013) Induced seismicity potential of energy technologies. In: APS March Meeting Abstracts, vol 1, pp 9002

  • Hsieh PA, Bredehoeft JD (1981) A reservoir analysis of the Denver earthquakes: A case of induced seismicity. J Geophys Res-Sol Ea (1978–2012) 86(B2):903–920

  • Lee J, Min KB, Rutqvist J (2012) Probabilistic analysis of fracture reactivation associated with deep underground CO2 injection. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(4):801–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li SY, He TM, Yin XC (2010) Introduction of rock fracture mechanics. University of Science and Technology of China Press, Hefei

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer EL, Baria R, Stark M, Oates S, Bommer J, Smith B, Asanuma H (2007) Induced seismicity associated with enhanced geothermal systems. Geothermics 36(3):185–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTigue D (1986) Thermoelastic response of fluid-saturated porous rock. J Geophys Res-Sol Ea (1978–2012) 91(B9):9533–9542

  • Mildren SD, Hillis RR, Kaldi I (2002) Calibrating predictions of fault seal reactivation in the Timor Sea. APPEA Journal

  • Mulders FMM (2003) Modelling of stress development and fault slip in and around a producing gas reservoir. Delft University of Technology, TU Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Mura T (1987) Micromechanics of defects in solids. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

  • Orlic B, Wassing B (2013) A study of stress change and fault slip in producing gas reservoirs overlain by elastic and viscoelastic caprocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46(3):421–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohmer J, Seyedi DM (2010) Coupled large scale hydromechanical modelling for caprock failure risk assessment of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers. Oil Gas Sci Technol-Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétrole 65(3):503–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudnicki JW (1986) Fluid mass sources and point forces in linear elastic diffusive solids. Mech Mater 5(4):383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist J, Birkholzer J, Cappa F, Tsang CF (2007) Estimating maximum sustainable injection pressure during geological sequestration of CO2 using coupled fluid flow and geomechanical fault-slip analysis. Energ Convers Manage 48(6):1798–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutqvist J, Birkholzer J, Tsang CF (2008) Coupled reservoir-geomechanical analysis of the potential for tensile and shear failure associated with CO2 injection in multilayered reservoir-caprock systems. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(2):132–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz CH (2002) The mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge University Press

  • Segall P (1985) Stress and subsidence resulting from subsurface fluid withdrawal in the epicentral region of the 1983 Coalinga earthquake. J Geophys Res-Sol Ea (1978–2012) 90(B8):6801–6816

  • Segall P (1989) Earthquakes triggered by fluid extraction. Geology 17(10):942–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall P, Fitzgerald SD (1998) A note on induced stress changes in hydrocarbon and geothermal reservoirs. Tectonophysics 289(1):117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall P, Grasso JR, Mossop A (1994) Poroelastic stressing and induced seismicity near the Lacq gas field, southwestern France. J Geophys Res-Sol Ea (1978–2012) 99:15423–15438

  • Shlyapobersky J (1985) Energy analysis of hydraulic fracturing. 26th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics. Rapid City, SD, pp 539–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltanzadeh H, Hawkes CD (2008) Semi-analytical models for stress change and fault reactivation induced by reservoir production and injection. J Petrol Sci Eng 60(2):71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltanzadeh H, Hawkes CD (2009) Assessing fault reactivation tendency within and surrounding porous reservoirs during fluid production or injection. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streit EE, Hillis RR (2004) Estimating fault stability and sustainable fluid pressures for underground storage of CO2 in porous rock. Energy 29(9–10):1445–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingay MR, Hillis RR, Morley CK, Swarbrick RE, Okpere EC (2003) Pore pressure/stress coupling in Brunei Darussalam-implications for shale injection. Special Publication-Geological Society of London 216:369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wees J, Buijze L, Van Thienen-Visser K, Nepveu M, Wassing B, Orlic B, Fokker P (2014) Geomechanics response and induced seismicity during gas field depletion in the Netherlands. Geothermics 52:206–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetmiller RJ (1986) Earthquakes near Rocky Mountain House, Alberta, and their relationship to gas production facilities. Can J Earth Sci 23:172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiprut D, Zoback MD (2000) Fault reactivation and fluid flow along a previously dormant normal fault in the northern North Sea. Geology 28(7):595–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoback MD (2012) Managing the seismic risk posed by wastewater disposal. Earth 57(4):38

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoback MD, Gorelick SM (2012) Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109(26):10164–10168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoback MD, Zinke JC (2002) Production-induced normal faulting in the Valhall and Ekofisk oil fields. In: The Mechanism of Induced Seismicity. Springer, pp 403–420

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11102218, and 41172285). Additionally, we would like to thank the reviewers for providing insightful comments and suggestions to the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lei Wang, Bing Bai or Xiaochun Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Bai, B., Li, X. et al. An Analytical Model for Assessing Stability of Pre-Existing Faults in Caprock Caused by Fluid Injection and Extraction in a Reservoir. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49, 2845–2863 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0933-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0933-0

Keywords

Navigation