Abstract
Reinforcement measures are often used in high-arch dams with complicated geological foundations. The geomechanical model test is an effective method to study the global stability of arch dams and to evaluate the reinforcement effects of foundation treatments. The block masonry technique was developed to simulate the jointed rock mass, tectonic discontinuities, and reinforcement measures. A tailor-made low-strength binder and small blocks were developed to simulate the strength and deformation of the jointed rock mass and discontinuities, respectively. We applied this technique to geomechanical model tests of the Dagangshan arch dam with and without foundation reinforcements. A rupture test was conducted, and the stress and displacement distribution of the dam and abutments were recorded; the failure mechanisms and processes were explored. The reinforcement effects of the foundation treatment were evaluated by comparing the test results of the models with and without foundation reinforcements. Our analysis indicates that foundation reinforcements can improve the stress distribution, decrease deformation, prevent slides, reduce fault movement, and improve the global stability of high-arch dams.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen J, Lai YQ (1993) Experimental study on the reinforcement scheme for the Geheyan gravity-arch dam on Qingjiang river by means of geomechanical model. J Yangtze River Sci Res Inst 10(1):36–43 (in Chinese)
Chen XH, Wang Z (1983) A research on stability of an arch dam abutments by geomechanical model tests. Chin J Geotech Eng 5(1):77–88 (in Chinese)
Chen XG, Zhang QY, Yang WD et al (2011) Comparative analysis of model tests and in situ monitoring of zonal disintegration of rock mass in deep tunnels. Chin J Geotech Eng 33(1):70–76 (in Chinese)
Chen Y, Zhang L, Yang GX et al (2012) Anti-sliding stability of a gravity dam on complicated foundation with multiple structural planes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 55:151–156. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.07.010
da Silveira AF, Azevedo MC, Esteves Ferreira MJ, Perreira da Costa CA (1979) High density and low strength material for geomechanical models. In: Proceeding of the international colloquium on geomechanical model. ISRM, Bergamo, pp 115–131
Fei WP, Zhang L, Zhang R (2010) Experimental study on a geo-mechanical model of a high arch dam. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(2):299–306. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.12.005
Fishman YA (2008) Features of shear failure of brittle materials and concrete structures on rock foundation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45(6):976–992. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.09.011
Fumagalli E (1966) Stability of arch dam rock abutments. In: Proceedings of 1st ISRM Congress, Lisbon, pp 503–508
Fumagalli E (1973) Statical and geomechanical models. Springer, New York
Han BL, Chen XL, Song YL et al (1997) Research on similar material of rock mass. J Wuhan Univ Hydraul Electr Eng 30(2):6–9 (in Chinese)
Jin F, Hu W, Pan JW et al (2011) Comparative study procedure for the safety evaluation of high arch dams. Comput Geotech 38:306–317. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.10.008
Lemos JV (1996) Modelling of arch dams on jointed rock foundations. In: Proceedings of ISRM international symposium—EUROCK 96, Turin pp 519–526
Lemos JV, Pina CAB, Costa CP et al (1995) Experimental study of an arch dam on a jointed foundation. In: Proceedings 8th ISRM Congress, Tokyo, pp 1263–1266
Li ZK, Wang AM (2006) Application and consideration of using fiber-sensor measurement in a 3D geo-mechanical model test. Exp Technol Manag 23(12):57–60 (in Chinese)
Liu J, Feng XT, Ding XL et al (2003) Stability assessment of the Three-Gorges Dam foundation, China, using physical and numerical modeling—part I: physical model tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(5):609–631. doi:10.1016/S1365-1609(03)00055-8
Ma FP, Li ZK, Luo GF (2004) NIOS model material and its use in geomechanical similarity model test. J Hydroelectr Eng 23(1):48–51 (in Chinese)
Oliveria.S, Faria R (2006) Numerical simulation of collapse scenarios in reduced scale tests of arch dams. Eng Struct 28(10):1 430–431, 439. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.01.012
Wang XQ, Ge H, Li Y (1989) The application of white light speckle method to measure deformation in modeling experiment of similar materials. J Chengdu Coll Geol 16(2):109–112 (in Chinese)
Wang HP, Li SC, Zheng XF (2009) Research progress of geomechanical model test with new technology and its engineering application. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 28(Suppl.1):2765–2771 (in Chinese)
Yu X, Zhou YF, Peng SZ (2005) Stability analysis of dam abutments by 3D elasto-plastic finite-element method: a case study of Houhe gravity-arch dam in China. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42(3):415–430. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.01.001
Zhang GX, Liu Y, Zhou QJ (2008) Study on real working performance and overload safety factor of high arch dam. Sci China Ser E Technol Sci 51:48–59. doi:10.1007/s11431-008-6012-3
Zhou WY, Yang RQ, Yan GR (1997) Stability evaluation methods and criteria in designing large arch dams. Design Hydroelectr Power Stn 13(2):1–7 (in Chinese)
Zhou J, Lin G, Zhu T, Jefferson AD, Williams FW (2000) Experimental investigations into seismic failure of high arch dam. J Struct Eng 126:926–935. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(926
Zhou WY, Yang RQ, Liu YR, Lin P (2005) Research on geomechanical model of rupture tests of arch dam for their stability. J Hydroelectr Eng 24(1):53–58 (in Chinese)
Zhu WS, Li Y, Li SC et al (2011) Quasi-three-dimensional physical model tests on a cavern complex under high in situ stresses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(2):199–209. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.11.008
Acknowledgments
The work reported here was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering with grant no. 2013-KY-2 and the China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists with grant no. 50925931.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L., Liu, Y.R. & Yang, Q. Evaluation of Reinforcement and Analysis of Stability of a High-Arch Dam Based on Geomechanical Model Testing. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48, 803–818 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0578-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0578-9